• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

课间环境和课程干预对儿童身体活动的影响:IPLAY。

Recess environment and curriculum intervention on children's physical activity: IPLAY.

机构信息

Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI, USA.

Anschutz Health and Wellness Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2019 Mar 1;9(2):202-216. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby015.

DOI:10.1093/tbm/iby015
PMID:29660107
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6669811/
Abstract

Understanding the impacts of the built environment on physical activity (PA) is essential to promoting children's PA. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of schoolyard renovations and a PA recess curriculum alone and in combination on children's PA. This was a 2 (learning landscape [LL] vs. non-LL) × 2 (curriculum intervention vs. no curriculum intervention) factorial design with random assignment to the curriculum intervention, and six elementary schools per condition. PA outcomes were assessed preprogram, mid-program, immediate postprogram, and one year postprogram. No meaningful intervention effects were found. Lack of an effect may be due to the brief dose of recess, the curriculum not being integrated within the schoolyard, the LL implementation occurring prior to the study, or the already high levels of PA. Potential avenues to promote PA include making recess longer, integrating recess into the school curricula, and developing recess PA curricula integrating schoolyards.

摘要

了解建筑环境对身体活动(PA)的影响对于促进儿童 PA 至关重要。本研究旨在调查单独和结合使用操场改造和 PA 课间休息课程对儿童 PA 的影响。这是一项 2(学习景观[LL]与非 LL)×2(课程干预与无课程干预)的因子设计,随机分配到课程干预组,每组有六所小学。PA 结果在预方案、方案中期、方案即刻后和方案一年后进行评估。没有发现有意义的干预效果。没有效果的原因可能是课间休息时间短,课程没有融入操场,LL 的实施发生在研究之前,或者是 PA 水平已经很高。促进 PA 的潜在途径包括延长课间休息时间、将课间休息时间融入学校课程以及开发融入校园的课间休息 PA 课程。

相似文献

1
Recess environment and curriculum intervention on children's physical activity: IPLAY.课间环境和课程干预对儿童身体活动的影响:IPLAY。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Mar 1;9(2):202-216. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby015.
2
A Multicomponent Schoolyard Intervention Targeting Children's Recess Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior: Effects After 1 Year.一项针对儿童课间体育活动和久坐行为的多成分校园干预措施:1年后的效果
J Phys Act Health. 2017 Nov 1;14(11):866-875. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2016-0656. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
3
An assessment of schoolyard renovation strategies to encourage children's physical activity.评估校园翻新策略以鼓励儿童身体活动。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Apr 9;8:27. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-27.
4
School and individual-level characteristics are associated with children's moderate to vigorous-intensity physical activity during school recess.学校和个体特征与儿童在课间休息时进行中等到剧烈强度的身体活动有关。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012 Oct;36(5):469-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00914.x.
5
Study protocol: the Fueling Learning through Exercise (FLEX) study - a randomized controlled trial of the impact of school-based physical activity programs on children's physical activity, cognitive function, and academic achievement.研究方案:通过运动促进学习(FLEX)研究——一项关于校内体育活动项目对儿童身体活动、认知功能和学业成绩影响的随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):1078. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3719-0.
6
Effectiveness of a Playground Intervention for Antisocial, Prosocial, and Physical Activity Behaviors.操场干预对反社会行为、亲社会行为和身体活动行为的有效性。
J Sch Health. 2017 May;87(5):338-345. doi: 10.1111/josh.12506.
7
Difference in Outdoor Time and Physical Activity During Recess After Schoolyard Renewal for the Least-Active Children.课后更新校园后,最不爱活动的孩子在课间的户外活动时间和身体活动方面的差异。
J Phys Act Health. 2020 Aug 28;17(10):968-976. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0270.
8
Effects of ready for recess, an environmental intervention, on physical activity in third- through sixth-grade children.准备课间休息对三至六年级儿童身体活动的影响。
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Feb;11(2):384-95. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0061. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
9
A Multicomponent Schoolyard Intervention Targeting Children's Recess Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior: Effects After One Year.一项针对儿童课间体育活动和久坐行为的多成分校园干预措施:一年后的效果
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Oct 24:1-28. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0702.
10
Schoolyard Characteristics, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Behavior: Combining GPS and Accelerometry.校园环境特征、身体活动与久坐行为:结合全球定位系统和加速度计的研究
J Sch Health. 2016 Dec;86(12):913-921. doi: 10.1111/josh.12459.

引用本文的文献

1
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.以学校为基础的身体活动计划促进 6 至 18 岁儿童和青少年身体活动和健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;9(9):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3.
2
Interventions to Change School Recess Activity Levels in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.干预措施改变儿童和青少年课间活动水平:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2020 Dec;50(12):2145-2173. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01347-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Moderating influences of baseline activity levels in school physical activity programming for children: the Ready for Recess project.儿童学校体育活动规划中基线活动水平的调节作用:课间休息准备项目
BMC Public Health. 2014 Feb 1;14:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-103.
2
Successful dissemination of Fun 5 - a physical activity and nutrition program for children.成功推广 Fun 5 - 一个针对儿童的体育活动和营养计划。
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Sep;2(3):276-85. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0120-0.
3
A microgeographic analysis of physical activity behavior within elementary school grounds.小学场地内身体活动行为的微观地理分析。
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jul-Aug;28(6):403-12. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.121116-QUAN-566. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
4
Playground designs to increase physical activity levels during school recess: a systematic review.旨在提高学校课间休息期间身体活动水平的操场设计:一项系统综述。
Health Educ Behav. 2014 Apr;41(2):138-44. doi: 10.1177/1090198113490725. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
5
The effect of school recess interventions on physical activity : a systematic review.课间休息干预对身体活动的影响:系统评价。
Sports Med. 2013 Apr;43(4):287-99. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0024-2.
6
Establishing wrist-based cutpoints for the Actical accelerometer in elementary school-aged children.建立适用于小学生的 Actical 加速度计腕部切点。
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Mar;11(3):604-13. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2011-0411. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
7
An assessment of schoolyard features and behavior patterns in children's utilization and physical activity.校园环境特征与儿童使用和身体活动行为模式评估
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Mar;11(3):564-73. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0064. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
8
Understanding contextual barriers, supports, and opportunities for physical activity among Mexican-origin children in Texas border colonias: a descriptive study.了解德克萨斯州边境社区墨西哥裔儿童进行身体活动的背景障碍、支持和机会:一项描述性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 8;13:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-14.
9
Systematic review of recess interventions to increase physical activity.系统回顾减少干预措施以增加身体活动。
J Phys Act Health. 2013 Aug;10(6):910-26. doi: 10.1123/jpah.10.6.910. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
10
Effectiveness of intervention on physical activity of children: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials with objectively measured outcomes (EarlyBird 54).干预措施对儿童身体活动效果的影响:基于客观测量结局的对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析(EarlyBird54)。
BMJ. 2012 Sep 27;345:e5888. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5888.