• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机、双盲比较阿立哌唑/舍曲林联合治疗与安慰剂/舍曲林联合治疗伴发重性抑郁障碍患者的疗效。

Randomized, double-blind comparison of aripiprazole/sertraline combination and placebo/sertraline combination in patients with major depressive disorder.

机构信息

Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Mental Health, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Aug;72(8):591-601. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12663. Epub 2018 May 21.

DOI:10.1111/pcn.12663
PMID:29660207
Abstract

AIM

This study compared the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole/sertraline combination (ASC) and placebo/sertraline combination (PSC) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who showed an inadequate response to sertraline 100 mg/day.

METHODS

The study comprised a screening period, an 8-week prospective treatment (single-blind sertraline 25-100 mg/day) period, and a 6-week double-blind treatment period. Patients with DSM-5-defined MDD were enrolled. Following the prospective treatment, non-responders were randomly assigned to the ASC group (aripiprazole 3-12 mg/day/sertraline 100 mg/day) or the PSC group (sertraline 100 mg/day). The primary efficacy end-point was the mean change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to 6 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 412 patients were randomly assigned to either the ASC group (n = 209) or the PSC group (n = 203). Mean change in MADRS total score was significantly greater in patients with ASC than PSC (-9.2 vs -7.2; P = 0.0070). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) that occurred in ≥10% of patients with ASC versus PSC were nasopharyngitis (13.4% vs 11.3%) and akathisia (12.9% vs 3.4%). All TEAE reported in the ASC group were mild or moderate in severity. Rates of discontinuations due to TEAE were low in both the ASC (1.9%) and PSC (1.5%) groups. There were no notable issues in safety assessments in the ASC group compared with the PSC group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with MDD who showed an inadequate response to treatment with sertraline 100 mg/day, ASC was efficacious and well tolerated.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了阿立哌唑/舍曲林联合治疗(ASC)与安慰剂/舍曲林联合治疗(PSC)在对每日 100mg 舍曲林治疗反应不足的重性抑郁障碍(MDD)患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究包括一个筛选期、一个 8 周的前瞻性治疗(单盲舍曲林 25-100mg/天)期和一个 6 周的双盲治疗期。入组患者符合 DSM-5 定义的 MDD。在进行前瞻性治疗后,无应答者被随机分配至 ASC 组(阿立哌唑 3-12mg/天/舍曲林 100mg/天)或 PSC 组(舍曲林 100mg/天)。主要疗效终点是从基线到 6 周时蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)总分的平均变化。

结果

共有 412 例患者被随机分配至 ASC 组(n=209)或 PSC 组(n=203)。ASC 组患者的 MADRS 总分平均变化显著大于 PSC 组(-9.2 对-7.2;P=0.0070)。ASC 组发生率≥10%的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)为鼻咽炎(13.4%对 11.3%)和静坐不能(12.9%对 3.4%)。ASC 组报告的所有 TEAE 均为轻度或中度。ASC 组(1.9%)和 PSC 组(1.5%)因 TEAE 停药率均较低。与 PSC 组相比,ASC 组在安全性评估方面没有出现明显问题。

结论

在对每日 100mg 舍曲林治疗反应不足的 MDD 患者中,ASC 是有效且耐受良好的。

相似文献

1
Randomized, double-blind comparison of aripiprazole/sertraline combination and placebo/sertraline combination in patients with major depressive disorder.随机、双盲比较阿立哌唑/舍曲林联合治疗与安慰剂/舍曲林联合治疗伴发重性抑郁障碍患者的疗效。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Aug;72(8):591-601. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12663. Epub 2018 May 21.
2
The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.阿立哌唑作为重度抑郁症辅助治疗的疗效与安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;68(6):843-53. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n0604.
3
The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a second multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.阿立哌唑作为重度抑郁症辅助治疗的疗效和安全性:第二项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Apr;28(2):156-65. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31816774f9.
4
Adjunctive low-dose aripiprazole with standard-dose sertraline in treating fresh major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study.在治疗首发重性抑郁障碍中,低剂量阿立哌唑辅助标准剂量舍曲林治疗的随机、双盲、对照研究。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011 Oct;31(5):563-8. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31822bb0db.
5
Aripiprazole augmentation in major depressive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with inadequate response to antidepressants.阿立哌唑辅助治疗重度抑郁症:一项针对对抗抑郁药反应欠佳患者的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
CNS Spectr. 2009 Apr;14(4):197-206. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900020216.
6
Adjunctive aripiprazole in major depressive disorder: analysis of efficacy and safety in patients with anxious and atypical features.阿立哌唑辅助治疗重度抑郁症:对伴有焦虑和非典型特征患者的疗效与安全性分析
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;69(12):1928-36. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
7
Analysis of suicidality in pooled data from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled aripiprazole adjunctive therapy trials in major depressive disorder.双相障碍和精神分裂症治疗药物阿立哌唑的安全性分析:一项为期 52 周、安慰剂对照、多中心临床试验的综合分析
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;72(4):548-55. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05495gre. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
8
Aripiprazole augmentation to antidepressant therapy in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ADMIRE study).阿立哌唑增效治疗对日本重性抑郁障碍患者抗抑郁治疗的作用:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究(ADMIRE 研究)。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Dec;151(3):899-905. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.07.035. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
9
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate augmentation for adults with major depressive disorder and inadequate response to antidepressant monotherapy: Results from 2 phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.赖氨酸安非他命二甲基磺酸盐辅助治疗对重度抑郁症且对抗抑郁单药治疗反应不足的成年人:两项3期、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究的结果
J Affect Disord. 2016 Dec;206:151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
10
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of augmentation pharmacotherapy with aripiprazole for treatment-resistant depression in late life: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.阿立哌唑强化药物治疗对老年难治性抑郁症的疗效、安全性及耐受性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Lancet. 2015 Dec 12;386(10011):2404-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00308-6. Epub 2015 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends and off-label utilization of antipsychotics in children and adolescents from 2016 to 2021 in China: a real-world study.2016年至2021年中国儿童和青少年抗精神病药物的使用趋势及超说明书用药情况:一项真实世界研究
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Jun 21;18(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13034-024-00766-4.
2
Repurposing of dextromethorphan as an adjunct therapy in patients with major depressive disorder: a randomised, group sequential adaptive design, controlled clinical trial protocol.将右美沙芬重新用于治疗重度抑郁症患者的辅助疗法:一项随机、分组序贯适应性设计、对照临床试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 30;14(4):e080500. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080500.
3
PET/CT study of dopamine transporter (DAT) binding with the triple reuptake inhibitor toludesvenlafaxine in rats and humans.
PET/CT 研究三重再摄取抑制剂托鲁地文拉法辛与大鼠和人类多巴胺转运体(DAT)的结合。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024 Jul;51(9):2638-2648. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06700-2. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
4
Machine learning-based prediction of sertraline concentration in patients with depression through therapeutic drug monitoring.通过治疗药物监测基于机器学习预测抑郁症患者的舍曲林浓度
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 6;15:1289673. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1289673. eCollection 2024.
5
Comparison of brexpiprazole, aripiprazole, and placebo for Japanese major depressive disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.布雷哌唑、阿立哌唑与安慰剂治疗日本重度抑郁症的比较:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2024 Mar;44(1):165-175. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12414. Epub 2024 Jan 14.
6
A Meta-Analysis of the Antidepressant Responses in Pivotal Trials on Esketamine Nasal Spray and Atypical Antipsychotics.艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂与非典型抗精神病药物关键试验中抗抑郁反应的Meta分析。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Dec 27;19:2857-2870. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S417027. eCollection 2023.
7
Magnitude of the Placebo Response Across Treatment Modalities Used for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.成人治疗抵抗性抑郁症的各种治疗手段的安慰剂反应程度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2125531. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25531.
8
Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults.成人难治性抑郁症的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 17;12(12):CD010557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010557.pub2.