Lenze Eric J, Mulsant Benoit H, Blumberger Daniel M, Karp Jordan F, Newcomer John W, Anderson Stewart J, Dew Mary Amanda, Butters Meryl A, Stack Jacqueline A, Begley Amy E, Reynolds Charles F
Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lancet. 2015 Dec 12;386(10011):2404-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00308-6. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
Treatment-resistant major depression is common and potentially life-threatening in elderly people, in whom little is known about the benefits and risks of augmentation pharmacotherapy. We aimed to assess whether aripiprazole is associated with a higher probability of remission than is placebo.
We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at three centres in the USA and Canada to test the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole augmentation for adults aged older than 60 years with treatment-resistant depression (Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score of ≥15). Patients who did not achieve remission during a pre-trial with venlafaxine extended-release (150-300 mg/day) were randomly assigned (1:1) to the addition of aripiprazole (target dose 10 mg [maximum 15 mg] daily) daily or placebo for 12 weeks. The computer-generated randomisation was done in blocks and stratified by site. Only the database administrator and research pharmacists had knowledge of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was remission, defined as an MADRS score of 10 or less (and at least 2 points below the score at the start of the randomised phase) at both of the final two consecutive visits, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00892047.
From July 20, 2009, to Dec 30, 2013, we recruited 468 eligible participants, 181 (39%) of whom did not remit and were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (n=91) or placebo (n=90). A greater proportion of participants in the aripiprazole group achieved remission than did those in the placebo group (40 [44%] vs 26 [29%] participants; odds ratio [OR] 2·0 [95% CI 1·1-3·7], p=0·03; number needed to treat [NNT] 6·6 [95% CI 3·5-81·8]). Akathisia was the most common adverse effect of aripiprazole (reported in 24 [26%] of 91 participants on aripiprazole vs 11 [12%] of 90 on placebo). Compared with placebo, aripiprazole was also associated with more Parkinsonism (15 [17%] of 86 vs two [2%] of 81 participants), but not with treatment-emergent suicidal ideation (13 [21%] of 61 vs 19 [29%] of 65 participants) or other measured safety variables.
In adults aged 60 years or older who do not achieve remission from depression with a first-line antidepressant, the addition of aripiprazole is effective in achieving and sustaining remission. Tolerability concerns include the potential for akathisia and Parkinsonism.
National Institute of Mental Health, UPMC Endowment in Geriatric Psychiatry, Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and the Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute.
难治性重度抑郁症在老年人中很常见,且可能危及生命,目前对于增效药物治疗的益处和风险知之甚少。我们旨在评估阿立哌唑与安慰剂相比,是否能使缓解的可能性更高。
我们在美国和加拿大的三个中心进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,以测试阿立哌唑增效治疗对60岁以上难治性抑郁症(蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁量表[MADRS]评分≥15)成人患者的疗效和安全性。在使用文拉法辛缓释片(150 - 300毫克/天)进行预试验期间未达到缓解的患者,被随机分配(1:1),每日添加阿立哌唑(目标剂量10毫克[最大15毫克])或安慰剂,为期12周。计算机生成的随机分组以区组形式进行,并按地点分层。只有数据库管理员和研究药剂师知道治疗分配情况。主要终点是缓解,定义为在最后连续两次访视时MADRS评分为10或更低(且比随机化阶段开始时的评分至少低2分),采用意向性分析。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT00892047。
从2009年7月20日至2013年12月30日,我们招募了468名符合条件的参与者,其中181名(39%)未缓解,并被随机分配至阿立哌唑组(n = 91)或安慰剂组(n = 90)。与安慰剂组相比,阿立哌唑组达到缓解的参与者比例更高(40名[44%]对26名[29%]参与者;优势比[OR] 2.0 [95%置信区间1.1 - 3.7],p = 0.03;需治疗人数[NNT] 6.6 [95%置信区间3.5 - 81.8])。静坐不能是阿立哌唑最常见的不良反应(91名服用阿立哌唑的参与者中有24名[26%]报告,而服用安慰剂的90名参与者中有11名[12%]报告)。与安慰剂相比,阿立哌唑还与更多的帕金森症相关(86名参与者中有15名[17%],而81名参与者中有2名[2%]),但与治疗中出现的自杀观念(61名参与者中有13名[21%],而65名参与者中有19名[29%])或其他测量的安全变量无关。
在60岁及以上使用一线抗抑郁药未达到抑郁症缓解的成年人中,添加阿立哌唑可有效实现并维持缓解。耐受性问题包括静坐不能和帕金森症的可能性。
美国国立精神卫生研究所、匹兹堡大学医学中心老年精神病学捐赠基金、泰勒家庭创新精神病学研究所、国家推进转化科学中心以及坎贝尔家庭心理健康研究所。