Krych Aaron J, Wu Isabella T, Desai Vishal S, Murthy Naveen S, Collins Mark S, Saris Daniel B F, Levy Bruce A, Stuart Michael J
Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Apr 9;6(4):2325967118765722. doi: 10.1177/2325967118765722. eCollection 2018 Apr.
Lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs), if left untreated, can cause devastating effects to the knee, with rapid articular cartilage degeneration and loss of the meniscus as a secondary stabilizer. Detection and surgical repair of these defects have been linked to favorable outcomes, but preoperative identification of LMPRTs continues to be challenging.
To determine the rate of LMPRTs diagnosed preoperatively on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a consecutive series of arthroscopically confirmed LMPRTs.
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
A retrospective cohort of 45 consecutive patients with arthroscopically confirmed LMPRTs between 2010 and 2017 were included in this study. The preoperative MRI report for each patient was evaluated and compared with intraoperative findings. Each preoperative MRI study was then reviewed by 2 fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists who worked in consensus.
A total of 45 patients (32 males, 13 females) with arthroscopically confirmed LMPRTs and a mean age of 27 years (range, 14-54 years) were included in the study. Only 15 of 45 LMPRTs (33%) were initially diagnosed on preoperative MRI. Past or concurrent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction was present in 37 of 45 cases (82%). Upon retrospective review, 15 of the 30 missed LMPRTs were "clearly evident," 12 "subtly evident," and 3 "occult" (unavoidably missed). There were no significant differences in the rate of LMPRT diagnosis based on history of prior knee surgery, meniscus extrusion, or tearing of the meniscofemoral ligament.
Despite improved identification of other meniscus tear patterns on MRI, a high percentage of LMPRTs were still missed. In the setting of previous ACL reconstruction, if the root cannot be confidently identified, the MRI interpretation should indicate that "the root is poorly visualized" to alert the surgeon to thoroughly evaluate this structure. The surgeon should maintain a high index of suspicion and carefully probe the posterior root of the lateral meniscus at the time of arthroscopy, especially in cases of ACL injury.
外侧半月板后根部撕裂(LMPRTs)若不治疗,会对膝关节造成严重影响,导致关节软骨迅速退变,且半月板作为二级稳定结构丧失。这些缺损的检测及手术修复与良好预后相关,但术前识别LMPRTs仍具有挑战性。
确定在一系列经关节镜证实的LMPRTs病例中,术前通过磁共振成像(MRI)诊断出LMPRTs的比例。
病例系列研究;证据等级,4级。
本研究纳入了2010年至2017年间连续45例经关节镜证实为LMPRTs的患者。评估每位患者的术前MRI报告,并与术中发现进行比较。然后由2名接受过专科培训的肌肉骨骼放射科医生共同对每份术前MRI研究进行复查。
本研究共纳入45例经关节镜证实为LMPRTs的患者(32例男性,13例女性),平均年龄27岁(范围14 - 54岁)。45例LMPRTs中仅有15例(33%)在术前MRI上被初步诊断。45例中有37例(82%)存在既往或同期前交叉韧带(ACL)重建。经回顾性分析,30例漏诊的LMPRTs中,15例“明显可见”,12例“隐约可见”,3例“隐匿性”(不可避免地漏诊)。基于既往膝关节手术史、半月板挤出或半月板股骨韧带撕裂情况,LMPRTs的诊断率无显著差异。
尽管MRI对其他半月板撕裂模式的识别有所改善,但仍有很高比例的LMPRTs被漏诊。在既往ACL重建的情况下,如果不能确定根部情况,MRI解读应表明“根部显示不清”,以提醒外科医生彻底评估该结构。外科医生应保持高度怀疑,并在关节镜检查时仔细探查外侧半月板后根部,尤其是在ACL损伤的病例中。