Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Division of Cardiology, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Heart. 2018 Oct;104(19):1562-1567. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312322. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
Randomised clinical trials are the gold standard for testing the effectiveness of clinical interventions. However, increasing complexity and associated costs may limit their application in the investigation of key cardiovascular knowledge gaps such as the re-evaluation of generic pharmacotherapies. The registry-based randomised clinical trial (RRCT) leverages data sampling from nationwide quality registries to facilitate high participant inclusion rates at comparably low costs and, therefore, may offer a mechanism by which such clinical questions may be answered. To date, a number of studies have been conducted using such trial designs, but uncritical use of the RRCT design may lead to erroneous conclusions. The current review provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the RRCT, as well as provides an exploratory example of how a trial may be designed to test the long-term effectiveness of beta blockers in patients with myocardial infarction who have preserved left ventricular systolic function.
随机临床试验是检验临床干预措施有效性的金标准。然而,不断增加的复杂性和相关成本可能会限制其在调查关键心血管知识空白方面的应用,例如重新评估通用药物治疗。基于登记的随机临床试验(RRCT)利用来自全国质量登记处的数据抽样,以较低的成本实现较高的参与者纳入率,因此,可能为回答此类临床问题提供一种机制。迄今为止,已经进行了多项使用此类试验设计的研究,但对 RRCT 设计的不加批判的使用可能会导致错误的结论。本综述提供了对 RRCT 的优势和劣势的深入了解,并提供了一个探索性的示例,说明如何设计试验来测试心肌梗死后左心室收缩功能正常的患者中β受体阻滞剂的长期疗效。