Suppr超能文献

再灌注时代心肌梗死后的长期β受体阻滞剂治疗:系统评价。

Long-Term Beta-Blocker Therapy after Myocardial Infarction in the Reperfusion Era: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Chilliwack General Hospital, Lower Mainland Pharmacy Services, Chilliwack, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2018 May;38(5):546-554. doi: 10.1002/phar.2110. Epub 2018 May 7.

Abstract

Beta-blockers are recommended as standard of care for patients who experience a myocardial infarction (MI). However, evidence to support this recommendation is primarily derived from the pre-reperfusion era. In the reperfusion era, short-term (≤ 30 days) beta-blocker therapy has been demonstrated to reduce recurrent MI and angina, but not mortality. The objective of this review was to evaluate the evidence for long-term (≥ 1 yr) beta-blocker therapy in patients post-MI without left ventricular dysfunction in the reperfusion era. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Google from inception to September 2017 was performed. Included were randomized controlled trials and observational propensity score cohort studies published within the past 10 years that compared beta-blockers to placebo/no beta-blockers at discharge in patients with an acute MI but without left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure. Outcomes of interest included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. Eight cohort studies were included. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 5 years. Two smaller studies demonstrated a reduction in all-cause mortality with beta-blockers, whereas there was no difference observed in six studies. One study showed reduced cardiovascular mortality at 1 year, but no difference in sudden cardiac death. One study demonstrated a reduction in cardiac mortality at 3 years, but no difference in MI or stroke. None of the four studies that reported adverse cardiovascular events demonstrated a benefit with beta-blocker therapy. Though these data are limited by observational methodology, the majority of the included studies failed to demonstrate a benefit in survival or cardiovascular events with long-term beta-blockers in post-MI patients with normal left ventricular function. In the absence of a contemporary randomized controlled trial, this evidence imparts uncertainty regarding the current standard of care and suggests that it may be reasonable to discontinue beta-blockers in patients without impaired left ventricular function at 1-year post-MI who do not have another indication for use.

摘要

β受体阻滞剂被推荐为心肌梗死(MI)患者的标准治疗方法。然而,支持这一推荐的证据主要来自再灌注前时代。在再灌注时代,短期(≤30 天)β受体阻滞剂治疗已被证明可减少复发性 MI 和心绞痛,但不能降低死亡率。本综述的目的是评估再灌注时代无左心室功能障碍的 MI 后患者长期(≥1 年)β受体阻滞剂治疗的证据。系统检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL 和 Google 从成立到 2017 年 9 月的文献。纳入了在过去 10 年内发表的比较急性 MI 患者出院时使用β受体阻滞剂与安慰剂/无β受体阻滞剂的随机对照试验和观察性倾向评分队列研究,这些患者无左心室功能障碍或心力衰竭。感兴趣的结局包括全因和心血管死亡率、非致死性 MI 和非致死性卒中等。纳入了 8 项队列研究。随访时间从 1 年到 5 年不等。两项较小的研究表明β受体阻滞剂可降低全因死亡率,而 6 项研究未观察到差异。一项研究表明 1 年时心血管死亡率降低,但心脏性猝死无差异。一项研究表明 3 年时心脏死亡率降低,但 MI 或卒中等无差异。四项报告不良心血管事件的研究均未证明β受体阻滞剂治疗有获益。尽管这些数据受到观察性研究方法的限制,但纳入的大多数研究未能证明在 MI 后左心室功能正常的患者中,长期使用β受体阻滞剂可改善生存或心血管事件。在缺乏当代随机对照试验的情况下,这一证据对当前的标准治疗方法带来了不确定性,并表明对于在 MI 后 1 年无左心室功能障碍且无其他使用指征的患者,停用β受体阻滞剂可能是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验