Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.
Department of Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Head Neck. 2018 Sep;40(9):2029-2042. doi: 10.1002/hed.25198. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
Newly diagnosed patients with head and neck cancer may be at risk for impaired neurocognitive function (NCF) due to disease, treatment, and lifestyle factors.
Eighty pretreatment patients with head and neck cancer and 40 control patients without cancer completed assessment of NCF and self-reported cognition, fatigue, and mood. Blood samples to evaluate organ reserves, hormones, and cytokines were collected.
Patients experienced worse symptoms of cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, and anxiety than controls. In contrast, NCF was equivalent for patients and controls. Using published norms as comparison, groups had similar high rates of impairment in performance (9/80 patients and 3/40 controls scored in the abnormal range).
Pretreatment patients with head and neck cancer reported cognitive disturbance. The frequency of impaired performance, albeit high, was consistent with the literature demonstrating false-positive "abnormal" neuropsychological test performance is not uncommon. Inclusion of a noncancer patient control cohort is essential because using solely normative data as a comparison may foster erroneous interpretation.
由于疾病、治疗和生活方式等因素,新诊断的头颈部癌症患者可能存在神经认知功能(NCF)受损的风险。
80 名头颈部癌症的预处理患者和 40 名无癌症的对照患者完成了 NCF 及自我报告的认知、疲劳和情绪评估。采集血液样本以评估器官储备、激素和细胞因子。
与对照组相比,患者经历了更严重的认知功能障碍、疲劳和焦虑症状。相反,患者和对照组的 NCF 相当。与已发表的标准相比,两组在表现方面都有相似的高损伤率(9/80 名患者和 3/40 名对照组的得分在异常范围内)。
头颈部癌症的预处理患者报告了认知障碍。尽管受损表现的频率很高,但与文献表明神经心理测试表现异常的假阳性并不少见的结果一致。纳入非癌症患者对照队列是至关重要的,因为仅使用标准数据进行比较可能会导致错误的解释。