Suppr超能文献

人生历程社会经济地位、日常压力源与日常幸福感:检验风险链式模型。

Life Course Socioeconomic Status, Daily Stressors, and Daily Well-Being: Examining Chain of Risk Models.

机构信息

Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.

Center for Healthy Aging, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Jan 1;74(1):126-135. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This article models the chain of risk that links life course socioeconomic status (SES), daily stressor exposure and severity, and daily well-being.

METHOD

Data from the main survey and the daily diary project of the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Refresher study were combined, resulting in 782 participants (55.6% female; age 25-74, Mage = 47.9) who reported on 5,849 days of information on daily stressors and daily well-being. Data were measured at both person and day levels. Between-person predictor variables include childhood SES, education, and adult SES. Within-person daily variables assessed exposure to daily stressors, severity of daily stressors, positive affect, negative affect, and daily physical symptoms. We contrasted hypothesized models, the chain of risk trigger effect model versus the additive model within a multilevel structural equation modeling framework.

RESULTS

The influences of life course SES and daily stressor exposure and severity on daily well-being were better described by the chain of risk additive model than the chain of risk trigger effect model. Childhood SES was directly and indirectly (through education, adult SES, and daily stressor exposure and severity) associated with daily well-being (in between-person level), especially daily physical symptoms and daily negative affect.

DISCUSSION

Childhood may be a sensitive period that has salient implications for day-to-day well-being later in life.

摘要

目的

本文构建了一个风险链模型,将生命历程中的社会经济地位(SES)、日常压力源暴露和严重程度,以及日常幸福感联系起来。

方法

将美国中年生活研究(MIDUS)刷新研究的主调查和日常日记项目的数据进行了合并,共纳入 782 名参与者(55.6%为女性;年龄 25-74 岁,Mage=47.9),他们报告了 5849 天的日常压力源和日常幸福感信息。数据分别在个体和日两个层面进行测量。个体间的预测变量包括童年 SES、教育和成人 SES。个体内的每日变量评估了日常压力源的暴露程度、日常压力源的严重程度、积极情绪、消极情绪和日常身体症状。我们在多层次结构方程模型框架内,对假设模型(风险链触发效应模型与加性模型)进行了对比。

结果

与风险链触发效应模型相比,生命历程 SES 以及日常压力源暴露和严重程度对日常幸福感的影响,通过加性模型可以得到更好的描述。童年 SES 通过教育、成人 SES 以及日常压力源的暴露和严重程度直接或间接(通过教育、成人 SES 以及日常压力源的暴露和严重程度)与日常幸福感(个体间水平)相关,尤其是与日常身体症状和日常消极情绪相关。

讨论

童年时期可能是一个敏感时期,对以后的日常生活幸福感有着重要的影响。

相似文献

3
Do daily stress processes account for socioeconomic health disparities?日常压力过程是社会经济健康差距的原因吗?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005 Oct;60 Spec No 2:34-9. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.special_issue_2.s34.

引用本文的文献

1
Sexual orientation and daily stress and well-being.性取向与日常压力及幸福感。
Health Psychol. 2025 Mar;44(3):197-206. doi: 10.1037/hea0001460.
9
Asymmetrical Effects of Sleep and Emotions in Daily Life.睡眠与情绪在日常生活中的不对称效应
Affect Sci. 2022 Apr 7;3(2):307-317. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00112-x. eCollection 2022 Jun.

本文引用的文献

3
Hardships of the Great Recession and health: Understanding varieties of vulnerability.大衰退的艰难困苦与健康:理解脆弱性的多样性
Health Psychol Open. 2016 Jun 1;3(1):2055102916652390. doi: 10.1177/2055102916652390. eCollection 2016 Jan.
7
The association of daily physical symptoms with future health.日常身体症状与未来健康的关联。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Oct;143:241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.050. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验