Devides Amanda Carreira, Rosa Patricia Sammarco, de Faria Fernandes Belone Andréa, Coelho Neusa Maria Broch, Ura Somei, Silva Eliane Aparecida
Instituto Lauro de Souza Lima, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Secretaria de Saúde de Rondonópolis, MT, Brazil.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Jul;91(3):260-265. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
Leprosy patients may present reactional episodes classified as type I or reversal reaction and type II or erythema nodosum leprosum. Early diagnosis of these reactions is hampered by lack of diagnostic tests. This study aimed at evaluating anti-Mycobacterium leprae antibody levels in reactional and nonreactional leprosy patients at the time of diagnosis. Clinical data and serum samples of 224 patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2010 were collected in the municipality of Rondonópolis-MTBR. Quantification of anti-phenolic glycolipid-1 (PGL-1) IgM antibodies of M. leprae was obtained by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method and anti-natural octyl disacharide-leprosy IDRI diagnostic (NDO-LID-1) IgM/IgG semiquantitative rapid test. We obtained low serological levels of anti-PGL-1 and anti-NDO-LID-1 for tuberculoid (T) (1.56% and 15.62%) and borderline tuberculoid (BT) patients (7.95% and 26.13%), medium levels in the borderline-borderline (BB) (47.91% and 68.75%), and high levels in lepromatous (LL) (93.33% and 100%) and borderline-lepromatous (BL) (88.0% and 100%). When comparing the reactional groups (RI and RII) with without reaction (WR) group at the time of diagnosis, we observed a statistically significant difference between the groups; patients with RII presented higher serological response: 66.66% anti-PGL-1 and 91.66% anti-NDO-LID-1. In respect to patients who developed a reaction after the initial diagnosis, they also showed significant positivity for both anti-PGL-1 and anti-NDO-LID-1 in comparison to the patients who stayed without reaction in the study period (P<0.0001). These results allow us to conclude that serological tests may contribute to an early diagnosis of RII and that the anti-NDO-LID-1 test was demonstrated to be a better indicator.
麻风病患者可能会出现反应性发作,分为I型或逆转反应以及II型或结节性红斑麻风。由于缺乏诊断测试,这些反应的早期诊断受到阻碍。本研究旨在评估诊断时反应性和非反应性麻风病患者的抗麻风分枝杆菌抗体水平。2009年至2010年间在朗多诺波利斯-马托格罗索州收集了224例确诊患者的临床数据和血清样本。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法获得麻风分枝杆菌抗酚糖脂-1(PGL-1)IgM抗体的定量结果,并采用抗天然辛基二糖-麻风病IDRI诊断(NDO-LID-1)IgM/IgG半定量快速检测法。我们发现结核样型(T)(1.56%和15.62%)和界线结核样型(BT)患者(7.95%和26.13%)的抗PGL-1和抗NDO-LID-1血清学水平较低,界线类偏结核样型(BB)患者(47.91%和68.75%)的水平中等,瘤型(LL)患者(93.33%和100%)和界线类偏瘤型(BL)患者(88.0%和100%)的水平较高。在诊断时将有反应组(RI和RII)与无反应(WR)组进行比较时,我们观察到两组之间存在统计学显著差异;RII患者呈现出更高的血清学反应:66.66%的抗PGL-1和91.66%的抗NDO-LID-1。对于在初次诊断后出现反应的患者,与在研究期间未出现反应的患者相比,他们的抗PGL-1和抗NDO-LID-1也均呈显著阳性(P<0.0001)。这些结果使我们得出结论,血清学检测可能有助于RII的早期诊断,并且抗NDO-LID-1检测被证明是一个更好的指标。