Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2607.
Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2607
J Immunol. 2018 Jun 1;200(11):3752-3761. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701268. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
Our understanding of memory CD8 T cells has been largely derived from acute, systemic infection models. However, memory CD8 T cells generated from mucosal infection exhibit unique properties and, following respiratory infection, are not maintained in the lung long term. To better understand how infection route modifies memory differentiation, we compared murine CD8 T cell responses to a vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) challenge generated intranasally (i.n.) or i.v. The i.n. infection resulted in greater peak expansion of VSV-specific CD8 T cells. However, this numerical advantage was rapidly lost during the contraction phase of the immune response, resulting in memory CD8 T cell numerical deficiencies when compared with i.v. infection. Interestingly, the antiviral CD8 T cells generated in response to i.n. VSV exhibited a biased and sustained proportion of early effector cells (CD127KLRG1) akin to the developmental program favored after i.n. influenza infection, suggesting that respiratory infection broadly favors an incomplete memory differentiation program. Correspondingly, i.n. VSV infection resulted in lower CD122 expression and eomesodermin levels by VSV-specific CD8 T cells, further indicative of an inferior transition to bona fide memory. These results may be due to distinct (CD103CD11b) dendritic cell subsets in the i.n. versus i.v. T cell priming environments, which express molecules that regulate T cell signaling and the balance between tolerance and immunity. Therefore, we propose that distinct immunization routes modulate both the quality and quantity of antiviral effector and memory CD8 T cells in response to an identical pathogen and should be considered in CD8 T cell-based vaccine design.
我们对记忆 CD8 T 细胞的理解在很大程度上来自于急性、系统性感染模型。然而,从黏膜感染中产生的记忆 CD8 T 细胞表现出独特的特性,并且在呼吸道感染后,不会在肺部长期存在。为了更好地了解感染途径如何改变记忆分化,我们比较了小鼠 CD8 T 细胞对水疱性口炎病毒(VSV)经鼻内(i.n.)或静脉内(i.v.)感染的反应。i.n. 感染导致了更高的 VSV 特异性 CD8 T 细胞的峰值扩增。然而,这种数量上的优势在免疫反应的收缩阶段迅速丧失,导致与 i.v. 感染相比,记忆 CD8 T 细胞数量不足。有趣的是,对 i.n. VSV 产生的抗病毒 CD8 T 细胞表现出偏向和持续的早期效应细胞(CD127KLRG1)比例,类似于 i.n. 流感感染后优先选择的发育程序,这表明呼吸道感染广泛有利于不完全的记忆分化程序。相应地,i.n. VSV 感染导致 VSV 特异性 CD8 T 细胞的 CD122 表达和 eomesodermin 水平降低,进一步表明向真正的记忆的过渡较差。这些结果可能是由于 i.n. 与 i.v. T 细胞启动环境中的不同(CD103CD11b)树突状细胞亚群导致的,这些亚群表达调节 T 细胞信号和耐受与免疫之间平衡的分子。因此,我们提出不同的免疫途径调节了针对相同病原体的抗病毒效应和记忆 CD8 T 细胞的质量和数量,在基于 CD8 T 细胞的疫苗设计中应予以考虑。