Montero-Miralles Paloma, Estévez-Luaña Roberto, DeGregorio-González César, Valencia-dePablo Oliver, Jaramillo David E, Cisneros-Cabello Rafael
Universidad de Sevilla. School of Dentistry. Sevilla.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Jan 1;10(1):e70-e74. doi: 10.4317/jced.54395. eCollection 2018 Jan.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness in dentin debris and smear layer removal from root canal walls using EDTA and QMix® alone and also activated with Nd:YAG laser.
50 single-rooted teeth were instrumented and divided in 5 groups according to irrigation protocol: 17% EDTA, QMix®, Nd:YAG laser alone, and combination of 17% EDTA - Nd:YAG laser and QMix® - Nd:YAG laser. Samples were evaluated using SEM. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-Square Fisher exact test and McNemar test.
Dentinal debris analysis showed statistically significant differences when comparing 17% EDTA vs Laser and Laser vs QMix® in combination with Laser at the apical third. The Smear Layer analysis also showed statistically significant differences at the apical third when comparing 17% EDTA vs Laser, QMix® vs QMix® in combination with Laser and Laser vs QMix® in combination with Laser.
17% EDTA was the most efficient irrigant showing the best results. Laser alone was not effective removing either dentinal debris or smear layer. Laser, endodontics, Smear Layer.
本研究的目的是评估单独使用乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和QMix®以及用钕钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)激光激活后从根管壁去除牙本质碎屑和玷污层的效果。
选取50颗单根牙进行根管预备,并根据冲洗方案分为5组:17% EDTA、QMix®、单独使用Nd:YAG激光,以及17% EDTA - Nd:YAG激光和QMix® - Nd:YAG激光联合组。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对样本进行评估。采用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验和McNemar检验进行统计学分析。
在根尖三分之一处,比较17% EDTA与激光组以及激光组与QMix®联合激光组时,牙本质碎屑分析显示出统计学上的显著差异。在根尖三分之一处,比较17% EDTA与激光组、QMix®与QMix®联合激光组以及激光组与QMix®联合激光组时,玷污层分析也显示出统计学上的显著差异。
17% EDTA是最有效的冲洗剂,效果最佳。单独使用激光在去除牙本质碎屑或玷污层方面无效。激光、牙髓病学、玷污层。