Health Informatics Department, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
J Healthc Eng. 2018 Feb 19;2018:6510249. doi: 10.1155/2018/6510249. eCollection 2018.
This article objective is to highlight implementation characteristics, concerns, or limitations over role-based access control (RBAC) use on health information system (HIS) using industry-focused literature review of current publishing for that purpose. Based on the findings, assessment for indication of RBAC is obsolete considering HIS authorization control needs.
We have selected articles related to our investigation theme "RBAC trends and limitations" in 4 different sources related to health informatics or to the engineering technical field. To do so, we have applied the following search query string: "Role-Based Access Control" OR "RBAC" AND "Health information System" OR "EHR" AND "Trends" OR "Challenges" OR "Security" OR "Authorization" OR "Attacks" OR "Permission Assignment" OR "Permission Relation" OR "Permission Mapping" OR "Constraint". We followed PRISMA applicable flow and general methodology used on software engineering for systematic review.
20 articles were selected after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria resulting contributions from 10 different countries. 17 articles advocate RBAC adaptations. The main security trends and limitations mapped were related to emergency access, grant delegation, and interdomain access control.
Several publishing proposed RBAC adaptations and enhancements in order to cope current HIS use characteristics. Most of the existent RBAC studies are not related to health informatics industry though. There is no clear indication of RBAC obsolescence for HIS use.
本文旨在通过对当前相关文献的行业重点综述,突出基于角色的访问控制(RBAC)在健康信息系统(HIS)中的实施特点、关注点或局限性。基于这些发现,考虑到 HIS 授权控制的需求,对 RBAC 的评估表明其已经过时。
我们从与卫生信息学或工程技术领域相关的 4 个不同来源中选择了与我们的调查主题“RBAC 趋势和局限性”相关的文章。为此,我们应用了以下搜索查询字符串:“Role-Based Access Control”或“RBAC”以及“Health information System”或“EHR”以及“Trends”或“Challenges”或“Security”或“Authorization”或“Attacks”或“Permission Assignment”或“Permission Relation”或“Permission Mapping”或“Constraint”。我们遵循 PRISMA 适用于软件工程系统综述的流程和一般方法。
经过纳入和排除标准的筛选,共选取了 20 篇文章,来自 10 个不同国家的研究成果。其中 17 篇文章提倡 RBAC 的适应性调整。映射出的主要安全趋势和局限性与紧急访问、授权委托和域间访问控制有关。
有许多出版的文献提出了 RBAC 的适应性调整和增强,以适应当前 HIS 的使用特点。尽管如此,大部分现有的 RBAC 研究与卫生信息学行业并无关联。没有明确的迹象表明 RBAC 已经不适用于 HIS 的使用。