• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审视医疗保健组织中有效信息治理的框架、政策和策略。

Examine frameworks policies and strategies for effective information governance in healthcare organizations.

作者信息

Okyere Boadu Richard, Wireko Adu Victor, Okyere Boadu Kwame Adu, Ibrahim Baishatu, Akey Prince, Amishadas Mensah Amponsah, Adzakpah Godwin, Kumasenu Mensah Nathan

机构信息

Department of Health Information Management School of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health and Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.

Sunyani Teaching Hospital, Sunyani, Ghana.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 11;20(7):e0327496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327496. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0327496
PMID:40644477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12250644/
Abstract

BACKGROUND STUDY

Health information, over the years, has been regarded as one of the crucial assets in the landscape of health on the grounds of the myriads of benefits derived from it. It plays a major role in policy planning and implementation, quality improvement, clinical decision-making, care continuity, disease surveillance, etc., making it an integral part of healthcare delivery. This substantiates the pressing need for an appropriate information governance (IG) system, ensuring proper data stewardship, measures to ensure data quality and that preserving the privacy and confidentiality of patient data are in place. As part of conscious efforts to improve health information governance, this study examines the entire information governance structure of healthcare facilities used as study areas, taking into account the effectiveness of data stewardship, data quality management and compliance with regulatory requirements.

METHODOLOGY

Employing a cross-sectional study design, data was collected from 432 healthcare professionals emanating from Cape Coast Teaching Hospital (CCTH), Eastern Regional Hospital Koforidua (ERHK) and Ledzokuku-Krowor Municipal Assembly (LEKMA) Hospital, all in Ghana. A semi-structured questionnaire, demarcated into five (5) parts, was used to collect the data. Closed-ended questions were analyzed with Stata 15.0 involving frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviation, standard errors and confident intervals. A chi-square test of independence was deployed to ascertain relationships between variables. Open-ended questions were coded and analyzed with Qualitative Data Analysis Miner 6.0, deploying inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The level of understanding of data stewardship (2.87/4.0), familiarity with concepts of data quality (2.73/5.0) and ethical considerations and privacy (3.13/5.0) when dealing with patient health data were found to be varied among the professionals, overall rated as moderate and affirming the need for improvement. The level of knowledge and understanding on these pertinent areas were highly influenced by type of profession (p < 0.001; p = 0.031 and, p < 0.001) respectively and been indicative that some type of health workers is much concerned about data stewardship and health information governance than others. Various methods and efforts were in place to ensure the quality of data; however, hampering these attempts included factors such as poor data collection methods, lack of resources, inadequate competency and some behavioral factors. In addition to these factors is the low level of training on data stewardship (1.86/4.0), which heavily leads to skewness in knowledge. The majority of healthcare professionals were familiar with and advocated for adherence to regulatory requirements such as HIPAA (33.7%), GDPR (21.3%) and HITECH Act (14.4%), in making data governance much robust. Efforts were also identified in ensuring privacy and confidentiality during the storage, processing and transmission of patient data mostly by deploying methods such as authentication (58.9%), use of secured computers and software (71.2%) and using secure electronic platforms (66.0%) respectively indicating a keen attention for data stewardship and governance. About 70% of healthcare professionals attested to the regular conduct of monthly compliance audits, however, the rate of training on data stewardship was discovered to be very low (1.86/4.0).

CONCLUSION

There is an existence of clear policies and procedures to guide data stewardship to enhance overall information governance, however, healthcare professionals' level of knowledge on subjects of information governance ought to be enhanced. There is a need to intensify training sessions on data quality, and regulatory requirements for health information governance to mitigate the gaps in knowledge among professionals.

摘要

背景研究

多年来,健康信息因其带来的诸多益处,被视为健康领域的关键资产之一。它在政策规划与实施、质量改进、临床决策、护理连续性、疾病监测等方面发挥着重要作用,使其成为医疗服务不可或缺的一部分。这凸显了建立适当信息治理(IG)系统的迫切需求,以确保数据的妥善管理、保证数据质量的措施到位,并保护患者数据的隐私和保密性。作为改善健康信息治理的自觉努力的一部分,本研究考察了用作研究区域的医疗机构的整个信息治理结构,同时考虑了数据管理的有效性、数据质量管理以及对监管要求的遵守情况。

方法

采用横断面研究设计,从加纳的海岸角教学医院(CCTH)、东部地区科福里杜瓦医院(ERHK)和莱佐库库 - 克罗沃尔市议会(LEKMA)医院的432名医疗专业人员中收集数据。使用一份分为五部分的半结构化问卷来收集数据。对封闭式问题使用Stata 15.0进行分析,涉及频率、百分比、均值、标准差、标准误差和置信区间。采用卡方独立性检验来确定变量之间的关系。对开放式问题进行编码,并使用定性数据分析挖掘器6.0进行分析,采用归纳主题分析。

结果

发现专业人员在处理患者健康数据时,对数据管理的理解水平(满分4分,得2.87分)、对数据质量概念的熟悉程度(满分5分,得2.73分)以及伦理考量和隐私方面(满分5分,得3.13分)各不相同,总体评级为中等,表明有改进的必要。在这些相关领域的知识和理解水平分别受到职业类型的高度影响(p < 0.001;p = 0.031和p < 0.001),这表明某些类型的卫生工作者比其他人员更关注数据管理和健康信息治理。为确保数据质量采取了各种方法和措施;然而,阻碍这些努力的因素包括数据收集方法不当、资源匮乏、能力不足以及一些行为因素。除了这些因素外,数据管理培训水平较低(满分4分,得1.86分),这严重导致了知识的偏差。大多数医疗专业人员熟悉并主张遵守诸如《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA,占33.7%)、《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR,占21.3%)和《健康信息技术经济与临床健康法案》(HITECH Act,占14.4%)等监管要求,以使数据治理更加稳健。在确保患者数据存储、处理和传输过程中的隐私和保密性方面也做出了努力,主要分别采用了身份验证(占58.9%)、使用安全计算机和软件(占71.2%)以及使用安全电子平台(占66.0%)等方法,这表明对数据管理和治理给予了密切关注。约70%的医疗专业人员证明每月定期进行合规审计,然而,发现数据管理培训率非常低(满分4分,得1.86分)。

结论

存在明确的政策和程序来指导数据管理以加强整体信息治理,然而,医疗专业人员在信息治理主题方面的知识水平有待提高。有必要加强关于数据质量以及健康信息治理监管要求的培训课程,以弥合专业人员之间的知识差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e98/12250644/3754a275a29d/pone.0327496.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e98/12250644/e0df73363bef/pone.0327496.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e98/12250644/3754a275a29d/pone.0327496.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e98/12250644/e0df73363bef/pone.0327496.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e98/12250644/3754a275a29d/pone.0327496.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Examine frameworks policies and strategies for effective information governance in healthcare organizations.审视医疗保健组织中有效信息治理的框架、政策和策略。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 11;20(7):e0327496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327496. eCollection 2025.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
8
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
9
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
10
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍

本文引用的文献

1
The challenges and opportunities of continuous data quality improvement for healthcare administration data.医疗管理数据持续数据质量改进的挑战与机遇
JAMIA Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(3):ooae058. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae058. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Digital health care and data work: Who are the data professionals?数字医疗保健和数据工作:数据专业人员是谁?
Health Inf Manag. 2024 Sep;53(3):243-251. doi: 10.1177/18333583231183083. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
3
Ethical hazards of health data governance in the metaverse.元宇宙中健康数据治理的伦理风险
Nat Mach Intell. 2023 May;5(5):480-482. doi: 10.1038/s42256-023-00658-w. Epub 2023 May 16.
4
What is data stewardship? Towards a comprehensive understanding.什么是数据治理?迈向全面理解。
J Biomed Inform. 2023 Apr;140:104337. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104337. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
5
Data Quality in Health Care: Main Concepts and Assessment Methodologies.医疗保健中的数据质量:主要概念和评估方法。
Methods Inf Med. 2023 May;62(1-02):5-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761500. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
6
Ensuring privacy in telemedicine: Ethical and clinical challenges.确保远程医疗中的隐私:伦理与临床挑战。
J Telemed Telecare. 2023 Apr;29(3):217-221. doi: 10.1177/1357633X221134952. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
7
Data governance functions to support responsible data stewardship in pediatric radiology research studies using artificial intelligence.数据治理的作用是在使用人工智能的儿科放射学研究中支持负责任的数据管理。
Pediatr Radiol. 2022 Oct;52(11):2111-2119. doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05427-2. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
8
Ethical considerations regarding the use of pooled data from electronic health records in general practice.关于在普通实践中使用电子健康记录的汇总数据的伦理考虑因素。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2022 Jul;51(7):537-540. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-08-21-6140.
9
Policy and Strategy for Interoperability of Digital Health in Europe.欧洲数字健康互操作性的政策和策略。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jun 6;290:897-901. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220209.
10
Improving Data Quality in Clinical Research Informatics Tools.提高临床研究信息学工具中的数据质量
Front Big Data. 2022 Apr 29;5:871897. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.871897. eCollection 2022.