• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃袖套切除术:更好的长期效果?一项长达 5 年随访的肥胖和超级肥胖患者的长期队列研究。

Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: Better Long-Term Results? A Long-Term Cohort Study Until 5 Years Follow-Up in Obese and Superobese Patients.

机构信息

Abdominal Surgery, Campus Sint-Niklaas, AZ Nikolaas, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.

Bariatric Medicine Institute, 1046 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2687-2695. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3248-2.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-018-3248-2
PMID:29671124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6132784/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The failure rate of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is increasing. Gastric pouch dilation is frequently suggested to be one of the causes for the failure. The banded laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (BLSG) has been proposed to overcome this complication. This is the first study that reports the long-term outcome (> 5 years) of BLSG in obese and superobese patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and forty-seven patients (n = 51, non-banded LSG (NLSG)/n = 96, BLSG) were followed up for 5 years. Patients were evaluated for % excess weight loss (%EWL), % excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL), weight regain, BMI, and complications. Weight loss analysis was also done between banded and non-banded superobese patient populations.

RESULT

There was statistical significant difference between two groups at each given time point in terms of %EWL and %EBMIL. NLSG group had higher weight loss failure rate (35.2%) and weight regain (19.6%) at the 5-year follow-up compared to BLSG group (P < 0.001). There was no statistical significant difference in weight loss between obese and superobese BLSG group. The complication rates were more with BLSG group (14.5%) compared to NLSG group (9.8%); no signs of band slippage, erosion, or migration were seen. There was no mortality seen.

CONCLUSION

BLSG surgery was found to be safe and effective in maintaining weight loss on the long term compared to the NLSG group with low incidence of band-related problems. Additionally, the NLSG group had a higher rate of weight loss failure and weight regain at 5 years compared to the BLSG group.

摘要

简介

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)的失败率正在上升。胃囊扩张常被认为是失败的原因之一。带囊腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(BLSG)已被提出以克服这一并发症。这是第一项报告肥胖和超级肥胖患者人群中 BLSG 长期结果(>5 年)的研究。

材料和方法

147 名患者(n=51,非带囊腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(NLSG)/n=96,BLSG)随访 5 年。患者接受% excess weight loss(%EWL)、% excess body mass index loss(%EBMIL)、体重反弹、BMI 和并发症评估。还对带囊和非带囊超级肥胖患者人群进行了减重分析。

结果

在每个给定的时间点,两组之间在%EWL 和%EBMIL 方面都有统计学显著差异。NLSG 组在 5 年随访时的体重减轻失败率(35.2%)和体重反弹率(19.6%)高于 BLSG 组(P<0.001)。超级肥胖 BLSG 组的减重差异无统计学意义。BLSG 组的并发症发生率(14.5%)高于 NLSG 组(9.8%);未发现带滑脱、侵蚀或迁移迹象。未发生死亡。

结论

与 NLSG 组相比,BLSG 手术在长期内被发现是安全有效的,可维持体重减轻,且带相关问题的发生率较低。此外,NLSG 组在 5 年后的体重减轻失败率和体重反弹率均高于 BLSG 组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801a/6132784/bee5d7a81e2b/11695_2018_3248_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801a/6132784/0a49d9047cbe/11695_2018_3248_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801a/6132784/e1b0e7a3e513/11695_2018_3248_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801a/6132784/bee5d7a81e2b/11695_2018_3248_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801a/6132784/0a49d9047cbe/11695_2018_3248_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801a/6132784/e1b0e7a3e513/11695_2018_3248_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/801a/6132784/bee5d7a81e2b/11695_2018_3248_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: Better Long-Term Results? A Long-Term Cohort Study Until 5 Years Follow-Up in Obese and Superobese Patients.胃袖套切除术:更好的长期效果?一项长达 5 年随访的肥胖和超级肥胖患者的长期队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2687-2695. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3248-2.
2
Two-Year Results of the Banded Versus Non-banded Re-sleeve Gastrectomy as a Secondary Weight Loss Procedure After the Failure of Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial.带环与非带环再袖状胃切除术作为初次袖状胃切除术失败后的二次减重手术的两年结果:一项随机对照试验。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jul;33(7):2049-2063. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06598-z. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
Banding the Sleeve Improves Weight Loss in Midterm Follow-up.在中期随访中,袖带绑扎可改善体重减轻情况。
Obes Surg. 2017 Apr;27(4):1098-1103. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2610-0.
4
To band or not to band--early results of banded sleeve gastrectomy.是否进行胃袖状带环术——胃袖状带环术的早期结果
Obes Surg. 2014 Apr;24(4):660-5. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1189-y.
5
Leaks in fixed-ring banded sleeve gastrectomies: a management approach.固定环带袖胃切除术的漏口:一种处理方法。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Aug;13(8):1259-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Morbidly Obese, Super-Obese, and Super-Super Obese Patients for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖、超病态肥胖和超级超病态肥胖患者的疗效比较。
Obes Surg. 2018 Jun;28(6):1484-1491. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3053-3.
7
Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: Single-Center Experience with a Four-Year Follow-Up.腹腔镜带袖套胃切除术:单中心四年随访经验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Nov;31(11):1269-1273. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0726. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
8
Is sleeve gastrectomy a therapeutic procedure for all obese patients?袖状胃切除术是否适用于所有肥胖患者?
Int J Surg. 2016 Jun;30:48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
9
One anastomosis gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional bariatric surgery for weight loss failure after primary restrictive procedure.一种吻合口胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术作为初次限制手术减肥失败后的减重修复术。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Jan;17(1):e13248. doi: 10.1111/ases.13248. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
10
Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy-a Single-Center, Retrospective Study.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的长期结局——一项单中心回顾性研究
Obes Surg. 2018 Jan;28(1):130-134. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2795-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With a Natural Band (Sewefy Wrap): Results From a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.使用天然束带(Sewefy Wrap)的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术评估:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的结果
Cureus. 2025 May 8;17(5):e83733. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83733. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Endoscopic Management of Dysfunctioning Gastric Band after Sleeve Gastrectomy with the Luso-Cor Esophageal Stent.使用卢索-科尔食管支架对袖状胃切除术后功能失调的胃束带进行内镜管理。
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 8;31(5):370-376. doi: 10.1159/000535814. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Banded One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (BOAGB) for Patients Living with Obesity and Extreme Obesity: A Single Institution's Experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Banding the Sleeve Improves Weight Loss in Midterm Follow-up.在中期随访中,袖带绑扎可改善体重减轻情况。
Obes Surg. 2017 Apr;27(4):1098-1103. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2610-0.
2
Banded Gastric Bypass: Better Long-Term Results? A Cohort Study with Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.束带胃旁路术:长期效果更佳?一项至少随访5年的队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2017 Apr;27(4):864-872. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2397-4.
3
Erratum to "Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leads the U.S. utilization of bariatric surgery at academic medical centers": Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 11 (2015) 987-990.
带环式胃旁路吻合术(BOAGB)治疗肥胖症和极重度肥胖症患者:单中心经验。
Obes Surg. 2024 May;34(5):1756-1763. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07194-5. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
4
Banded Versus Non-banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.束带式与非束带式袖状胃切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Jan 23;16(1):e52799. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52799. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Banded Versus Non-banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: 5-Year Results of a 3-Year Randomized Controlled Trial.带环与非带环袖状胃切除术:3 年随机对照试验 5 年结果。
Obes Surg. 2024 Feb;34(2):310-317. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06982-9. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
6
Long-Term Outcomes 10 Years after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single Center Retrospective Analysis.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术 10 年后的长期结果:单中心回顾性分析。
Obes Surg. 2023 Aug;33(8):2356-2360. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06709-w. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
7
Two-Year Results of the Banded Versus Non-banded Re-sleeve Gastrectomy as a Secondary Weight Loss Procedure After the Failure of Primary Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial.带环与非带环再袖状胃切除术作为初次袖状胃切除术失败后的二次减重手术的两年结果:一项随机对照试验。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jul;33(7):2049-2063. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06598-z. Epub 2023 May 9.
8
Comparison of Sleeve Volume Between Banded and Non-banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: Midterm Effect on Weight and Food Tolerance-a Retrospective Study.带扎与不带扎袖状胃切除术的袖套容积比较:对体重和食物耐受性的中期影响-一项回顾性研究。
Obes Surg. 2023 Feb;33(2):406-417. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06404-2. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
9
Comparison of the mid-term outcomes of banded and non-banded sleeve gastrectomy: safety, food tolerance, and weight regain.带环与不带环袖状胃切除术中期结果比较:安全性、食物耐受性和体重反弹。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9146-9155. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09395-4. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
10
Closed loop small bowel obstruction due to herniation through silastic ring after bariatric surgery.肥胖手术后因疝出硅酮环导致闭环小肠梗阻。
BMJ Case Rep. 2022 May 26;15(5):e250335. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2022-250335.
《腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在学术医疗中心引领美国肥胖症手术的应用》勘误:《肥胖与相关疾病外科》11卷(2015年)987 - 990页。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 May;12(4):937. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
4
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: First Prospective Pilot Randomized Study.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜带环袖状胃切除术:首例前瞻性初步随机研究
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:6419603. doi: 10.1155/2016/6419603. Epub 2016 Apr 10.
5
Safety and efficacy of 1020 consecutive laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies performed as a primary treatment modality for morbid obesity. A single-center experience from the metabolic and bariatric surgical accreditation quality and improvement program.1020例连续腹腔镜袖状胃切除术作为病态肥胖主要治疗方式的安全性和有效性。来自代谢与减重手术认证质量改进项目的单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2673-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4548-4. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
6
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leads the U.S. utilization of bariatric surgery at academic medical centers.在学术医疗中心,腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在美国减肥手术的应用中占主导地位。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):987-90. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
7
Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review of Comparative Outcomes with Respective Primary Procedures.修订式Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术:对各自初次手术的比较结果的系统评价
Obes Surg. 2015 Jul;25(7):1271-80. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1670-2.
8
Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013.《2013年全球减肥手术》
Obes Surg. 2015 Oct;25(10):1822-32. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1657-z.
9
Sleeve gastrectomy with anti-reflux procedures.袖状胃切除术联合抗反流手术。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2014 Sep;12(3):287-94. doi: 10.1590/s1679-45082014ao2885.
10
Impact of extent of antral resection on surgical outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity (a prospective randomized study).胃窦切除范围对病态肥胖患者袖状胃切除术手术结局的影响(一项前瞻性随机研究)
Obes Surg. 2014 Oct;24(10):1587-94. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1242-x.