• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据和风险的澳大利亚和新西兰实验室警报清单协调方法。

An evidence- and risk-based approach to a harmonized laboratory alert list in Australia and New Zealand.

机构信息

NSW Health Pathology, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Endocrinology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia, Phone: +612 93829082, Fax: +612 93829099.

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Dec 19;57(1):89-94. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-1114.

DOI:10.1515/cclm-2017-1114
PMID:29672264
Abstract

Individual laboratories are required to compose an alert list for identifying critical and significant risk results. The high-risk result working party of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) and the Australasian Association of Clinical Biochemists (AACB) has developed a risk-based approach for a harmonized alert list for laboratories throughout Australia and New Zealand. The six-step process for alert threshold identification and assessment involves reviewing the literature, rating the available evidence, performing a risk analysis, assessing method transferability, considering workload implications and seeking endorsement from stakeholders. To demonstrate this approach, a worked example for deciding the upper alert threshold for potassium is described. The findings of the worked example are for infants aged 0-6 months, a recommended upper potassium alert threshold of >7.0 mmol/L in serum and >6.5 mmol/L in plasma, and for individuals older than 6 months, a threshold of >6.2 mmol/L in both serum and plasma. Limitations in defining alert thresholds include the lack of well-designed studies that measure the relationship between high-risk results and patient outcomes or the benefits of treatment to prevent harm, and the existence of a wide range of clinical practice guidelines with conflicting decision points at which treatment is required. The risk-based approach described presents a transparent, evidence- and consensus-based methodology that can be used by any laboratory when designing an alert list for local use. The RCPA-AACB harmonized alert list serves as a starter set for further local adaptation or adoption after consultation with clinical users.

摘要

各实验室均需制定一份用于识别危急值和重要风险结果的警示列表。澳大利亚皇家病理学家学会(RCPA)和澳大利亚临床生物化学家协会(AACB)的高风险结果工作组已制定了一项基于风险的方法,用于为澳大利亚和新西兰的实验室制定统一的警示列表。警示阈值识别和评估的六步流程包括:查阅文献、评估现有证据、进行风险分析、评估方法可转移性、考虑工作量影响以及寻求利益相关者的认可。为了演示这种方法,我们描述了一个用于确定钾的上限警示阈值的实例。该实例的研究结果适用于 0-6 个月龄的婴儿,推荐的血清钾上限警示阈值为>7.0mmol/L,血浆钾上限警示阈值为>6.5mmol/L,对于 6 个月以上的个体,血清和血浆的阈值均为>6.2mmol/L。定义警示阈值的局限性包括缺乏精心设计的研究,这些研究无法衡量高风险结果与患者结局或治疗预防危害的益处之间的关系,以及存在广泛的临床实践指南,这些指南在需要治疗的决策点上存在冲突。所描述的基于风险的方法提供了一种透明、基于证据和共识的方法,任何实验室在为本地使用设计警示列表时均可使用。RCPA-AACB 统一警示列表可作为进一步本地化调整或采用的起点,调整或采用前需与临床用户协商。

相似文献

1
An evidence- and risk-based approach to a harmonized laboratory alert list in Australia and New Zealand.基于证据和风险的澳大利亚和新西兰实验室警报清单协调方法。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Dec 19;57(1):89-94. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-1114.
2
An update report on the harmonization of adult reference intervals in Australasia.澳大拉西亚成年人参考区间协调的更新报告。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Dec 19;57(1):38-41. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0920.
3
Critical Risk Results - An Update on International Initiatives.重大风险结果——国际倡议的最新情况
EJIFCC. 2016 Feb 9;27(1):66-76. eCollection 2016 Feb.
4
What Alert Thresholds Should Be Used to Identify Critical Risk Results: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.应当使用何种警报阈值来识别关键风险结果:对证据的系统回顾。
Clin Chem. 2016 Nov;62(11):1445-1457. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.260638. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
5
Reporting unit size and measurement uncertainty: current Australian practice in clinical chemistry and haematology.报告单位大小与测量不确定度:澳大利亚临床化学与血液学的当前实践
Pathology. 2015 Aug;47(5):462-5. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000271.
6
Sweat testing for cystic fibrosis: standards of performance in Australasia.囊性纤维化的汗液检测:澳大拉西亚地区的检测标准
Ann Clin Biochem. 2009 Jul;46(Pt 4):332-7. doi: 10.1258/acb.2009.009023. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
7
Uptake of recommended common reference intervals for chemical pathology in Australia.澳大利亚化学病理学推荐通用参考区间的采用情况。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2017 May;54(3):395-397. doi: 10.1177/0004563216679853. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
8
Sweat testing for cystic fibrosis: A review of New Zealand laboratories.囊性纤维化的汗液检测:新西兰实验室综述
J Paediatr Child Health. 2006 Apr;42(4):160-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00822.x.
9
Recommendations for standardized reporting of protein electrophoresis in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰的蛋白电泳标准化报告建议。
Ann Clin Biochem. 2012 May;49(Pt 3):242-56. doi: 10.1258/acb.2011.011158. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
10
Harmonising adult and paediatric reference intervals in australia and new zealand: an evidence-based approach for establishing a first panel of chemistry analytes.协调澳大利亚和新西兰成人及儿科参考区间:建立首批化学分析物检测组的循证方法
Clin Biochem Rev. 2014 Nov;35(4):213-35.

引用本文的文献

1
A New Perspective to Longstanding Challenges with Outpatient Hyperkalemia: A Narrative Review.门诊高钾血症长期挑战的新视角:叙述性综述
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2023 Jan 12;10:20543581221149710. doi: 10.1177/20543581221149710. eCollection 2023.
2
An evaluation of adult critical result policies in haematology in a teaching hospital in China.中国一家教学医院血液学成人危急结果政策评估
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Feb;7(3):47. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.01.16.