胸大肌肌间沟阻滞对乳腺癌术后镇痛效果无影响:一项随机、双盲、双中心对照临床试验。

Pectoral I Block Does Not Improve Postoperative Analgesia After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Dual-Centered Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal.

Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des Îles, Îles de la Madeleine, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;43(6):596-604. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000779.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

General anesthesia for breast surgery may be supplemented by using a regional anesthetic technique. We evaluated the efficacy of the first pectoral nerve block (Pecs I) in treating postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, dual-centered, placebo-controlled trial was performed. One hundred twenty-eight patients scheduled for unilateral breast cancer surgery were recruited. A multimodal analgesic regimen and surgeon-administered local anesthetic infiltration were used for all patients. Ultrasound-guided Pecs I was performed using bupivacaine or saline. The primary outcome was the patient pain score (numerical rating scale [NRS]) in the recovery unit 30 minutes after admission or just before the morphine administration (NRS ≥4/10). The secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption (ie, in the recovery unit and after 24 hours).

RESULTS

During recovery, no significant difference in NRS was observed between the bupivacaine (n = 62, 3.0 [1.0-4.0]) and placebo (n = 65, 3.0 [1.0-5.0]) groups (P = 0.55). However, the NRS was statistically significantly different, although not clinically significant, for patients undergoing major surgeries (mastectomies or tumorectomies with axillary clearance) (n = 29, 3.0 [0.0-4.0] vs 4.0 [2.0-5.0], P = 0.04). Morphine consumption during recovery did not differ (1.5 mg [0.0-6.0 mg] vs 3.0 mg [0.0-6.0 mg], P = 0.20), except in the major surgery subgroup (1.5 mg [0.0-6.0 mg] vs 6.0 mg [0.0-12.0 mg], P = 0.016). Intraoperative sufentanil and cumulative morphine consumption up to 24 hours did not differ between the 2 groups. Three patients experienced complications related to the Pecs I.

CONCLUSIONS

Pecs I is not better than a saline placebo in the presence of multimodal analgesia for breast cancer surgery. However, its role in extended (major) breast surgery may warrant further investigation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01670448.

摘要

背景与目的

乳腺癌手术的全身麻醉可以辅以区域麻醉技术。我们评估了第一胸神经阻滞(Pecs I)在治疗乳腺癌手术后疼痛的疗效。

方法

进行了一项随机、双盲、双中心、安慰剂对照试验。招募了 128 名计划行单侧乳腺癌手术的患者。所有患者均采用多模式镇痛方案和术者给予局部麻醉浸润。超声引导下进行 Pecs I 时使用布比卡因或生理盐水。主要结局是患者在入院后 30 分钟或在给予吗啡前(NRS≥4/10)在恢复室的疼痛评分(数字评分量表[NRS])。次要结局是术后阿片类药物的消耗量(即恢复室和 24 小时后)。

结果

在恢复期间,布比卡因组(n=62,3.0[1.0-4.0])和安慰剂组(n=65,3.0[1.0-5.0])之间的 NRS 无显著差异(P=0.55)。然而,对于接受大手术(乳房切除术或腋窝清扫术的肿瘤切除术)的患者,NRS 存在统计学差异,但无临床意义(n=29,3.0[0.0-4.0] vs 4.0[2.0-5.0],P=0.04)。恢复期间吗啡的消耗量无差异(1.5mg[0.0-6.0mg] vs 3.0mg[0.0-6.0mg],P=0.20),但在大手术亚组中,吗啡的消耗量有差异(1.5mg[0.0-6.0mg] vs 6.0mg[0.0-12.0mg],P=0.016)。两组之间术中舒芬太尼和 24 小时内累积吗啡的消耗量无差异。3 名患者出现与 Pecs I 相关的并发症。

结论

在乳腺癌手术的多模式镇痛中,Pecs I 并不优于生理盐水安慰剂。然而,它在广泛(大)乳房手术中的作用可能需要进一步研究。

临床试验注册

本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,标识符为 NCT01670448。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索