Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Muğla, Turkey.
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Muğla, Turkey.
J Clin Anesth. 2019 May;54:61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.10.040. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy of women all over the world. In this study, we compared the effects of ultrasound-guided modified pectoral nerve (PECS) block and erector spinae plane (ESP) block on postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and intraoperative fentanyl need of patients undergoing unilateral modified radical mastectomy surgery.
Single-blinded, prospective, randomized, efficacy study.
Tertiary university hospital, postoperative recovery room and surgical ward.
Forty patients (ASA I-II) were allocated to two groups. After exclusion, 38 patients were included in the final analysis (18 patients in the PECS groups and 20 in the ESP group).
Modified pectoral nerve block was performed in the PECS group and erector spinae plane block was performed in the ESP group.
Postoperative tramadol consumption and pain scores were compared between the groups. Also, intraoperative fentanyl need was measured.
Postoperative tramadol consumption was 132.78 ± 22.44 mg in PECS group and 196 ± 27.03 mg in ESP group (p = 0.001). NRS scores at the 15th and 30th min were similar between the groups. However, median NRS scores were significantly lower in PECS group at the postoperative 60th min, 120th min, 12th hour and 24th hour (p = 0.024, p = 0.018, p = 0.021 and p = 0.011 respectively). Intraoperative fentanyl need was 75 mg in PECS group and 87.5 mg in ESP group. The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.263).
Modified PECS block reduced postoperative tramadol consumption and pain scores more effectively than ESP block after radical mastectomy surgery.
乳腺癌是全世界女性最常见的恶性肿瘤。本研究比较了超声引导下改良胸肌神经(PECS)阻滞和竖脊肌平面(ESP)阻滞对行改良根治性乳房切除术的患者术后阿片类药物消耗、疼痛评分和术中芬太尼需求的影响。
单盲、前瞻性、随机、疗效研究。
三级大学医院,术后恢复室和外科病房。
40 名(ASA I-II 级)患者被分配到两组。排除后,38 名患者纳入最终分析(PECS 组 18 例,ESP 组 20 例)。
PECS 组行改良胸肌神经阻滞,ESP 组行竖脊肌平面阻滞。
比较两组患者术后曲马多消耗和疼痛评分。还测量了术中芬太尼的需要量。
PECS 组术后曲马多消耗为 132.78±22.44mg,ESP 组为 196±27.03mg(p=0.001)。两组患者术后 15min 和 30min 的 NRS 评分相似。然而,PECS 组在术后 60min、120min、12h 和 24h 的 NRS 评分中位数显著较低(p=0.024、p=0.018、p=0.021 和 p=0.011)。PECS 组术中芬太尼需要量为 75mg,ESP 组为 87.5mg。差异无统计学意义(p=0.263)。
改良 PECS 阻滞在根治性乳房切除术后比 ESP 阻滞更有效地减少术后曲马多消耗和疼痛评分。