Equity and Health Unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine at Antwerp, Belgium; Athena Institute, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands; ISGlobal, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Athena Institute, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Soc Sci Med. 2018 May;205:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.029. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
Increasing research and reflections on quality of healthcare across the perinatal period slowly propels the global community to lobby for improved standards of quality perinatal healthcare, especially in low- and middle-income countries.
The purpose of this qualitative study was to obtain a deeper understanding of how interpersonal dimensions of the quality of care relate to real-life experiences of perinatal care, in a resource-constrained local health system.
In total, 41 in-depth interviews and five focus group discussions (N = 34) were conducted with perinatal women and local health system health professionals living and working in rural Uganda. Data analysis used an emergent and partially inductive, thematic framework based on the grounded theory approach.
The results indicated that interpersonal aspects of quality of perinatal care and service delivery are largely lacking in this low-resource setting. Thematic analysis showed three interrelated process aspects of quality of perinatal care: negative reported patient-provider interactions, the perceptions shaping patient-provider interactions, and emergent consequences arising out of these processes of care. Further reflections expose the central, yet often-unheeded, role of perinatal women's agency in their own health seeking behaviours and overall well-being, as well as that of underlying practical norms surrounding health worker attitudes and behaviours.
These findings highlight the complexity of patient-centred perinatal healthcare provision in rural Uganda and point to the relevance of linking the interpersonal dimensions of quality of care to the larger systemic and structural dimensions of perinatal healthcare.
对围产期医疗保健质量的研究和反思日益增多,这促使全球社会呼吁提高围产期医疗保健质量标准,尤其是在中低收入国家。
本 qualitative 研究旨在深入了解在资源有限的当地卫生系统中,护理质量的人际维度如何与围产期护理的实际体验相关。
总共对 41 名生活和工作在乌干达农村的围产期妇女和当地卫生系统卫生专业人员进行了 41 次深入访谈和 5 次焦点小组讨论(N=34)。数据分析采用基于扎根理论方法的新兴和部分归纳主题框架。
结果表明,在这种资源匮乏的环境中,围产期护理和服务提供的人际方面很大程度上缺乏。主题分析显示了围产期护理质量的三个相互关联的过程方面:负面的报告的医患互动、塑造医患互动的看法以及这些护理过程中产生的紧急后果。进一步的反思揭示了围产期妇女在寻求自身健康和整体福祉方面的核心作用,而这一作用往往被忽视,同时还揭示了围绕卫生工作者态度和行为的基本实践规范的作用。
这些发现强调了在乌干达农村提供以患者为中心的围产期医疗保健的复杂性,并指出将护理质量的人际维度与围产期医疗保健的更大系统和结构维度联系起来的相关性。