• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Biases in forensic experts.

作者信息

Dror Itiel E

机构信息

Itiel E. Dror is a senior cognitive neuroscience researcher at University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Science. 2018 Apr 20;360(6386):243. doi: 10.1126/science.aat8443.

DOI:10.1126/science.aat8443
PMID:29674567
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Biases in forensic experts.法医专家中的偏见。
Science. 2018 Apr 20;360(6386):243. doi: 10.1126/science.aat8443.
2
[Forensic medicine: For health and justice].
Presse Med. 2018 Apr;47(4 Pt 1):336-338. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2018.04.003.
3
Qualitative Research in Correctional Settings: Researcher Bias, Western Ideological Influences, and Social Justice.惩教机构中的定性研究：研究者偏见、西方意识形态影响与社会正义
J Forensic Nurs. 2018 Apr/Jun;14(2):72-79. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000199.
4
Legal justice and mental health.
Psychiatry. 1958 May;21(2):101-13. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1958.11023119.
5
Minimising bias in the forensic evaluation of suspicious paediatric injury.尽量减少对可疑儿童伤害进行法医评估时的偏差。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2015 Aug;34:11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 22.
6
[Biology and justice].
J Soc Biol. 2003;197(4):327-8.
7
Legal services: best, promising, and emerging practices.法律服务：最佳、有前景及新兴实践。
Torture. 2011;21(1):56-60.
8
[Social and health impact of Institutes of Legal Medicine in Spain: beyond justice].[西班牙法医学机构的社会与健康影响：超越司法范畴]
Med Clin (Barc). 2014 Mar;142 Suppl 2:5-11. doi: 10.1016/S0025-7753(14)70065-X.
9
[The criteria for appointing experts in forensic medicine].
Soud Lek. 2015 Winter;60(1):9-12.
10
Ethics, law, and medicine: today's crossroads.
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc. 1986 Winter;49(1):12-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Transparent reporting in forensic Science: Exploring its meaning and challenges.法医学中的透明报告：探究其意义与挑战。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2025 Jul 18;11:100630. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2025.100630. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Biased and Biasing: The Hidden Bias Cascade and Bias Snowball Effects.偏见与产生偏见：隐藏的偏见级联效应和偏见雪球效应。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 8;15(4):490. doi: 10.3390/bs15040490.
3
Self-Assembly of Silver Clusters into One- and Two-Dimensional Structures and Highly Selective Methanol Sensing.
银簇自组装成一维和二维结构及高选择性甲醇传感
Research (Wash D C). 2022 Dec 21;2022:0018. doi: 10.34133/research.0018. eCollection 2022.
4
Seeing the random forest through the decision trees. Supporting learning health systems from histopathology with machine learning models: Challenges and opportunities.透过决策树审视随机森林。利用机器学习模型助力基于组织病理学的学习型健康系统：挑战与机遇。
J Pathol Inform. 2023 Nov 4;15:100347. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100347. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
History information management strategy for minimising biases and noise for improved medical diagnosis.历史信息管理策略可减少偏倚和噪声，提高医学诊断效果。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Aug;12(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002367.
6
Reducing the impact of cognitive bias in decision making: Practical actions for forensic science practitioners.减少认知偏差对决策的影响：法医学从业者的实际行动。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Jun 18;7:100341. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100341. eCollection 2023.
7
Error and bias in race and ethnicity descriptions in medical examiner records in New Mexico: Consequences for understanding mortality among Hispanic/Latinos.新墨西哥州法医记录中种族和族裔描述的错误与偏差：对理解西班牙裔/拉丁裔死亡率的影响
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Jun 8;7:100338. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100338. eCollection 2023.
8
'Anyone who commits such a cruel crime, must be criminally irresponsible': context effects in forensic psychological assessment.“任何犯下如此残忍罪行的人，必定是刑事责任能力缺失的”：法医心理评估中的情境效应
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Jul 13;29(4):506-515. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1938272. eCollection 2022.
9
How to make better forensic decisions.如何做出更好的法医决策。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 20;119(38):e2206567119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206567119. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
10
Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources of bias in juror decision making.法律外行决策中的认知和人为因素：陪审员决策中的偏见来源。
Med Sci Law. 2022 Jul;62(3):206-215. doi: 10.1177/00258024221080655. Epub 2022 Feb 17.