• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少认知偏差对决策的影响:法医学从业者的实际行动。

Reducing the impact of cognitive bias in decision making: Practical actions for forensic science practitioners.

作者信息

Kunkler Kimberly S, Roy Tiffany

机构信息

Forensic Science Graduate Program, Marshall University, 1401 Forensic Science Drive, Huntington, WV, 25701, USA.

ForensicAid, LLC, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Jun 18;7:100341. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100341. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100341
PMID:37409239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10319185/
Abstract

Previously published methods for reducing the impact of cognitive bias in forensic decision making have focused primarily on actions at the laboratory or organizational levels. This paper presents generalized and specific actions that forensic science practitioners can take to reduce the impact of cognitive bias in their work. Practical examples illustrating ways that practitioners can implement many of the specific actions are also provided, along with some suggestions for handling court testimony about cognitive bias. The actions presented in this paper provide a means through which individual practitioners can take ownership for minimizing cognitive bias in their work. Such actions can provide supporting evidence to stakeholders that forensic practitioners acknowledge the existence of cognitive bias and its potential influence on their work, and they can also stimulate implementation of methods that focus on solutions at the laboratory and organizational levels.

摘要

先前发表的减少认知偏差对法医决策影响的方法主要集中在实验室或组织层面的行动上。本文介绍了法医科学从业者可以采取的一般性和具体行动,以减少认知偏差对其工作的影响。还提供了实际例子,说明从业者可以如何实施许多具体行动,以及一些关于处理有关认知偏差的法庭证词的建议。本文提出的行动为个体从业者提供了一种手段,使其能够自主采取措施,尽量减少工作中的认知偏差。这些行动可以向利益相关者提供支持性证据,证明法医从业者承认认知偏差的存在及其对工作的潜在影响,还可以促使实施侧重于实验室和组织层面解决方案的方法。

相似文献

1
Reducing the impact of cognitive bias in decision making: Practical actions for forensic science practitioners.减少认知偏差对决策的影响:法医学从业者的实际行动。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Jun 18;7:100341. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100341. eCollection 2023.
2
Strengthening forensic DNA decision making through a better understanding of the influence of cognitive bias.通过更好地理解认知偏差的影响来加强法医DNA决策。
Sci Justice. 2017 Nov;57(6):415-420. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
3
Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.法医学中的认知偏差研究:一项系统综述。
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Apr;297:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
4
A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.法医学中基于风险的认知偏差处理方法。
Sci Justice. 2019 Sep;59(5):533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners.法医思维:面向法医从业者的认知科学
Sci Justice. 2017 Mar;57(2):144-154. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
6
Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners.专家法医文件鉴定员的偏差能力和可靠性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2021 Jan;318:110610. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110610. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
7
Cognitive neuroscience in forensic science: understanding and utilizing the human element.法医学中的认知神经科学:理解与运用人为因素。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 5;370(1674). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0255.
8
A global survey of the attitudes and perspectives of cognitive bias in forensic anthropology.法医学人类学中认知偏差的态度与观点的全球调查。
Sci Justice. 2024 Jul;64(4):347-359. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
9
Diagnosing Crime and Diagnosing Disease: Bias Reduction Strategies in the Forensic and Clinical Sciences.诊断犯罪与诊断疾病:法医与临床科学中的偏见减少策略
J Forensic Sci. 2017 Nov;62(6):1534-1541. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13453. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
10
Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.法医毒理学决策中的情境偏差:来自中国的首次调查
Forensic Sci Int. 2022 Apr;333:111232. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111232. Epub 2022 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Biased and Biasing: The Hidden Bias Cascade and Bias Snowball Effects.偏见与产生偏见:隐藏的偏见级联效应和偏见雪球效应。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 8;15(4):490. doi: 10.3390/bs15040490.
2
A dataset of drip patterns for teaching and research purposes in forensic bloodstain pattern analysis.一个用于法医血迹形态分析教学与研究目的的滴状形态数据集。
Data Brief. 2025 Jan 31;59:111352. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111352. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Evaluating the validity of testimony: The role of the order of evidence.评估证词的有效性:证据顺序的作用。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Nov 21;9:100562. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100562. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive bias in workplace investigation: Problems, perspectives and proposed solutions.职场调查中的认知偏差:问题、观点及建议解决方案
Appl Ergon. 2022 Nov;105:103860. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103860. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
2
A practical tool for information management in forensic decisions: Using Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E) in casework.法医决策中信息管理的实用工具:在实际案件工作中使用扩展线性顺序揭露法(LSU-E)
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 Feb 20;4:100216. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100216. eCollection 2022.
3
Linear Sequential Unmasking- (LSU-): A general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias.线性顺序解蔽法(LSU):一种用于改善决策以及将噪声和偏差降至最低的通用方法。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Aug 13;3:100161. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100161. eCollection 2021.
4
Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions.法医学决策中的认知偏差。
J Forensic Sci. 2021 Sep;66(5):1751-1757. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14697. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
5
Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias.专家决策中的认知和人为因素:六个谬论和八个偏见来源。
Anal Chem. 2020 Jun 16;92(12):7998-8004. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
6
The curse of observer experience: Error in noninvasive genetic sampling.观察者经验的诅咒:非侵入性遗传采样中的错误。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 13;15(3):e0229762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229762. eCollection 2020.
7
ISO Standards Addressing Issues of Bias and Impartiality in Forensic Work.解决法医工作中偏见和公正性问题的国际标准化组织标准。
J Forensic Sci. 2020 May;65(3):800-808. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14265. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
8
A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.法医学中基于风险的认知偏差处理方法。
Sci Justice. 2019 Sep;59(5):533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
9
Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.法医学中的认知偏差研究:一项系统综述。
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Apr;297:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
10
Cognitive bias in clinical medicine.临床医学中的认知偏差。
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018 Sep;48(3):225-232. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2018.306.