Suppr超能文献

减少认知偏差对决策的影响:法医学从业者的实际行动。

Reducing the impact of cognitive bias in decision making: Practical actions for forensic science practitioners.

作者信息

Kunkler Kimberly S, Roy Tiffany

机构信息

Forensic Science Graduate Program, Marshall University, 1401 Forensic Science Drive, Huntington, WV, 25701, USA.

ForensicAid, LLC, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Jun 18;7:100341. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100341. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Previously published methods for reducing the impact of cognitive bias in forensic decision making have focused primarily on actions at the laboratory or organizational levels. This paper presents generalized and specific actions that forensic science practitioners can take to reduce the impact of cognitive bias in their work. Practical examples illustrating ways that practitioners can implement many of the specific actions are also provided, along with some suggestions for handling court testimony about cognitive bias. The actions presented in this paper provide a means through which individual practitioners can take ownership for minimizing cognitive bias in their work. Such actions can provide supporting evidence to stakeholders that forensic practitioners acknowledge the existence of cognitive bias and its potential influence on their work, and they can also stimulate implementation of methods that focus on solutions at the laboratory and organizational levels.

摘要

先前发表的减少认知偏差对法医决策影响的方法主要集中在实验室或组织层面的行动上。本文介绍了法医科学从业者可以采取的一般性和具体行动,以减少认知偏差对其工作的影响。还提供了实际例子,说明从业者可以如何实施许多具体行动,以及一些关于处理有关认知偏差的法庭证词的建议。本文提出的行动为个体从业者提供了一种手段,使其能够自主采取措施,尽量减少工作中的认知偏差。这些行动可以向利益相关者提供支持性证据,证明法医从业者承认认知偏差的存在及其对工作的潜在影响,还可以促使实施侧重于实验室和组织层面解决方案的方法。

相似文献

3
Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.法医学中的认知偏差研究:一项系统综述。
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Apr;297:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
4
A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.法医学中基于风险的认知偏差处理方法。
Sci Justice. 2019 Sep;59(5):533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners.法医思维:面向法医从业者的认知科学
Sci Justice. 2017 Mar;57(2):144-154. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
6
Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners.专家法医文件鉴定员的偏差能力和可靠性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2021 Jan;318:110610. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110610. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

本文引用的文献

4
Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions.法医学决策中的认知偏差。
J Forensic Sci. 2021 Sep;66(5):1751-1757. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14697. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
8
A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.法医学中基于风险的认知偏差处理方法。
Sci Justice. 2019 Sep;59(5):533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
9
Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.法医学中的认知偏差研究:一项系统综述。
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Apr;297:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
10
Cognitive bias in clinical medicine.临床医学中的认知偏差。
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018 Sep;48(3):225-232. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2018.306.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验