• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌根治术后年龄对非转移性胃癌的预后价值:一项在美国和中国开展的回顾性研究

The prognostic value of age in non-metastatic gastric cancer after gastrectomy: a retrospective study in the U.S. and China.

作者信息

Zhang Jieyun, Gan Lu, Xu Mi-Die, Huang Mingzhu, Zhang Xiaowei, Gong Yiwei, Wang Xi, Yu Guanzhen, Guo Weijian

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.

Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.

出版信息

J Cancer. 2018 Mar 8;9(7):1188-1199. doi: 10.7150/jca.22085. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.7150/jca.22085
PMID:29675100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5907667/
Abstract

We explored the influence of age on clinicopathologic features and survival of patients with M0 gastric cancer (GC). 16856 GC patients from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and 1037 GC patients from Chinese multiple centers were enrolled in the U.S. and Chinese cohort, respectively. 50-year-old was treated as cutoff age. Propensity score method was used to carry out a 1:1 paired match. In the U.S. cohort, we found that younger patients presented poor tumor behavior. However, in spite of worse outcome in stage IIV cohort, young group showed better 3-year survival in M0 patients, especially for those who underwent a total gastrectomy. In a matched analysis, a better prognosis was still observed in younger group. The prognostic value of age was also validated in M0 GC patients with gastrectomy in Chinese cohort. In spite of the worse outcome in survival curve of stage IIV GC cohort, young patients with gastrectomy presented favorable survival in M0 subgroup. It is also applicable in China. Early diagnosis and treatment should be taken seriously in young GC patients since they often possess poorer characteristics but benefited more from gastrectomy.

摘要

我们探讨了年龄对M0期胃癌(GC)患者临床病理特征和生存情况的影响。分别从美国监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据库纳入16856例GC患者,以及来自中国多个中心的1037例GC患者作为美国队列和中国队列。以50岁作为年龄分界点。采用倾向评分法进行1:1配对匹配。在美国队列中,我们发现年轻患者的肿瘤行为较差。然而,尽管IIV期队列的结局较差,但年轻组M0期患者的3年生存率更高,尤其是那些接受全胃切除术的患者。在配对分析中,年轻组仍显示出较好的预后。年龄的预后价值在中国队列中接受胃切除术的M0期GC患者中也得到了验证。尽管IIV期GC队列生存曲线的结局较差,但接受胃切除术的年轻患者在M0亚组中表现出良好的生存情况。这在中国也适用。年轻的GC患者应重视早期诊断和治疗,因为他们往往具有较差的特征,但从胃切除术中获益更多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/5907667/5ee926c275a1/jcav09p1188g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/5907667/e7f21ac7cdcf/jcav09p1188g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/5907667/96b391822235/jcav09p1188g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/5907667/5ee926c275a1/jcav09p1188g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/5907667/e7f21ac7cdcf/jcav09p1188g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/5907667/96b391822235/jcav09p1188g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/5907667/5ee926c275a1/jcav09p1188g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The prognostic value of age in non-metastatic gastric cancer after gastrectomy: a retrospective study in the U.S. and China.胃癌根治术后年龄对非转移性胃癌的预后价值:一项在美国和中国开展的回顾性研究
J Cancer. 2018 Mar 8;9(7):1188-1199. doi: 10.7150/jca.22085. eCollection 2018.
2
Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic of gastric cancer in young patients.青年胃癌患者的临床病理特征及预后
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep;51(9):1043-9. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1180707. Epub 2016 May 16.
3
Survival benefits of gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with stage IV: a population-based study.IV期胃癌患者行胃切除术的生存获益:一项基于人群的研究。
Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 20;8(63):106577-106586. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22535. eCollection 2017 Dec 5.
4
Insufficient examined lymph node count underestimates staging in pN3a patients after curative gastrectomy: a multicenter study with external validation.根治性胃切除术后,未充分检查的淋巴结数量低估了 pN3a 患者的分期:一项具有外部验证的多中心研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb;146(2):515-528. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03081-0. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
5
Alpha-fetoprotein is a significant prognostic factor for gastric cancer: Results from a propensity score matching analysis after curative resection.甲胎蛋白是胃癌的一个重要预后因素:根治性切除术后倾向评分匹配分析的结果
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;43(8):1542-1549. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 May 3.
6
Comparison of Young Patients with Gastric Cancer in the United States and China.中美两国年轻胃癌患者的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;24(13):3964-3971. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6073-2. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
7
Modest overall survival improvements from 1998 to 2009 in metastatic gastric cancer patients: a population-based SEER analysis.1998年至2009年转移性胃癌患者的总体生存率有适度提高:一项基于人群的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jul;19(3):723-34. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0541-9. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
8
The preoperative prognostic nutrition index is a prognostic indicator for survival in elderly gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.术前预后营养指数是老年胃癌患者胃切除术后生存的预后指标:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Updates Surg. 2020 Jun;72(2):483-491. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00745-2. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
Age-specific effects on the prognosis after surgery for gastric cancer: A SEER population-based analysis.年龄对胃癌手术后预后的特异性影响:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库人群的分析
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 26;7(30):48614-48624. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9548.
10
Large tumor size is a poor prognostic factor of gastric cancer with signet ring cell: Results from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.肿瘤体积较大是胃印戒细胞癌的不良预后因素:监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的结果
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(40):e17367. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017367.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative sarcopenia and postoperative accelerated muscle loss negatively impact survival after resection of locally advanced gastric cancer.术前肌肉减少症和术后加速的肌肉流失对局部晚期胃癌切除术后的生存产生负面影响。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 14;25(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13674-3.
2
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy.预测接受放疗的胃印戒细胞癌患者生存情况的列线图的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 2;14(1):29963. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81620-7.
3
Clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcome and prognostic factors of very young gastric cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
2
Gastric cancer.胃癌。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2654-2664. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30354-3. Epub 2016 May 5.
3
May Circulating microRNAs be Gastric Cancer Diagnostic Biomarkers?循环微小RNA能否成为胃癌诊断生物标志物?
非常年轻胃癌的临床病理特征、生存结局和预后因素。
Clin Exp Med. 2023 Jun;23(2):437-445. doi: 10.1007/s10238-022-00822-3. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
4
The impact of age on long-term survival following gastrectomy for gastric cancer.年龄对胃癌胃切除术后长期生存的影响。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Mar;105(3):269-277. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0355. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
5
Clinical Features and Survival of Young Adults with Stage IV Gastric Cancer: a Japanese Population-Based Study.IV期胃癌青年患者的临床特征与生存情况:一项基于日本人群的研究
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023 Mar;54(1):56-61. doi: 10.1007/s12029-021-00797-6. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
6
Retrospective Cohort Study of Intraoperative Administration of Sustained-Release 5-Fluorouracil Implants in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients.晚期胃癌患者术中给予缓释5-氟尿嘧啶植入剂的回顾性队列研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 13;12:659258. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.659258. eCollection 2021.
7
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Population-Based Study.胃印戒细胞癌预后列线图的开发与验证:一项基于多中心人群的研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 5;11:603031. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.603031. eCollection 2021.
8
The impact of age on prognosis in patients with gastric cancer: experience in a tertiary care centre.年龄对胃癌患者预后的影响:三级医疗中心的经验
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020 Dec;11(6):1233-1241. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-139.
9
Clinical significance of peripheral blood-derived inflammation markers in advanced gastric cancer after radical resection.根治性切除术后晚期胃癌外周血源性炎症标志物的临床意义
BMC Surg. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00884-8.
10
U-shaped relationship of age at diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality in primary urachal adenocarcinoma: a cohort study.原发性脐尿管腺癌诊断年龄与癌症特异性死亡率的U型关系:一项队列研究
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Jun;9(3):1073-1081. doi: 10.21037/tau-19-863.
J Cancer. 2015 Sep 20;6(12):1206-13. doi: 10.7150/jca.12535. eCollection 2015.
4
Genomic aberrations in young and elderly  breast cancer patients.年轻和老年乳腺癌患者的基因组畸变
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 15;13:266. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0504-3.
5
Older Age is Associated with a Higher Incidence of Melanoma Death but a Lower Incidence of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in the SEER Databases (2003-2011).在监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(2003 - 2011年)中,老年与黑色素瘤死亡的较高发生率相关,但前哨淋巴结转移的发生率较低。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;22(7):2120-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4538-8. Epub 2015 May 5.
6
Individual having a parent with early-onset gastric cancer may need screening at younger age.父母患有早发性胃癌的个体可能需要在更年轻时进行筛查。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 21;21(15):4592-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4592.
7
Comparison of gastric cancer survival between Caucasian and Asian patients treated in the United States: results from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.美国白种人和亚洲胃癌患者生存率的比较:来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;22(9):2965-71. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4388-4. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
8
Analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes of gastric cancer in younger patients: a case control study using propensity score methods.年轻胃癌患者的预后因素及结局分析:一项采用倾向评分法的病例对照研究
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 28;20(12):3369-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3369.
9
Gastric cancer in the young: is it a different clinical entity? A retrospective cohort study.青年胃癌:是否为一种不同的临床实体?一项回顾性队列研究。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:125038. doi: 10.1155/2014/125038. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
10
Worldwide trends in gastric cancer mortality (1980-2011), with predictions to 2015, and incidence by subtype.全球胃癌死亡率趋势(1980-2011 年),预测至 2015 年,以及各亚型的发病率。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 May;50(7):1330-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.01.029. Epub 2014 Mar 17.