Casella Claudia, Capasso Emanuele, Terracciano Lucia, Delbon Paola, Fedeli Piergiorgio, Salzano Francesco Antonio, Policino Fabio, Niola Massimo
Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II". Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples, Section of Legal Medicine, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Open Med (Wars). 2018 Apr 18;13:119-121. doi: 10.1515/med-2018-0019. eCollection 2018.
This study originated from events that occurred in 2014 in an Italian hospital, where the embryos of a couple, obtained by means of homologous insemination, were mistakenly implanted into the uterus of another woman who, along with her husband, underwent the same treatment. Faced with this serious adverse circumstance, that gives rise to ethical and legal issues, the authors conducted a comparative examination of how to consider the division of maternity (between biological mother and uterine mother) and the related division of paternity (between genetic father and legal father, husband or partner of the gestational mother). Some preliminary observations are made concerning parenthood and filiation within the context of currently applicable Italian law. The following is a detailed analysis of the arguments in favour of the parental figures involved (gestational mother/genetic mother).
本研究源于2014年在一家意大利医院发生的事件,在该事件中,一对夫妇通过同源授精获得的胚胎被错误地植入了另一名女性的子宫,该女性与其丈夫接受了相同的治疗。面对这一引发伦理和法律问题的严重不利情况,作者对如何考虑母性的划分(在生物学母亲和子宫母亲之间)以及相关的父性划分(在基因父亲和法律父亲、妊娠母亲的丈夫或伴侣之间)进行了比较研究。针对意大利现行法律背景下的亲子关系和亲属关系,提出了一些初步看法。以下是对支持相关父母身份(妊娠母亲/基因母亲)的论据的详细分析。