• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚丙型肝炎治疗直接作用抗病毒药物的使用和支出。

Uptake of and Expenditure on Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Treatment in Australia.

机构信息

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Aug;16(4):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0392-8.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-018-0392-8
PMID:29675692
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have revolutionised treatment for the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Currently, treatment costs between 20,000 and 80,000 Australian dollars ($A) per patient. The Australian Federal Government provided $A1 billion over 5 years to subsidise these drugs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper was to evaluate the uptake and financial impact of DAA prescribing in Australia.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective analysis of Medicare prescription and expenditure data for March 2016 to August 2017. Prescription numbers and expenditure data were extracted from the Medicare Statistical Reports website. Numbers of prescriptions were converted to per capita rates. HCV prevalence measures were used to provide context to prescription rates. All costs were reported in $A, year 2017 values.

RESULTS

Nationally, 211,184 DAA prescriptions were reimbursed. Whilst $A3.6 billion was expended through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, confidential pricing agreements precluded calculation of the precise cost. In 18 months, estimated expenditure greatly exceeded the $A1 billion in funding for 5 years. Nationally, the rate of prescriptions was 872/100,000 individuals. Prescription rates were highest in the Australian Capital Territory (1087/100,000) and lowest in Western Australia (625/100,000) despite HCV prevalence being comparable to the national rate in both regions.

CONCLUSIONS

Uptake of DAAs has been enthusiastic in the first 18 months of this funding agreement. However, the lack of transparency due to the confidential special pricing agreements means actual government expenditure is unknown. Post-marketing review by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee may enable renegotiation of DAA prices with the sponsors.

摘要

背景

直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)彻底改变了丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的治疗方法。目前,每位患者的治疗费用在 20000 至 80000 澳元(A)之间。澳大利亚联邦政府在 5 年内提供了 10 亿澳元用于补贴这些药物。

目的

本文旨在评估澳大利亚 DAA 处方的采用情况和对财务的影响。

方法

我们对 2016 年 3 月至 2017 年 8 月期间的医疗保险处方和支出数据进行了回顾性分析。从 Medicare 统计报告网站提取了处方数量和支出数据。将处方数量转换为人均比率。HCV 流行率数据用于为处方率提供背景。所有成本均以澳元报告,为 2017 年的价值。

结果

在全国范围内,有 211184 份 DAA 处方获得了报销。尽管通过药品福利计划支出了 36 亿澳元,但由于保密定价协议,无法计算确切的成本。在 18 个月内,预计支出大大超过了 5 年 10 亿澳元的资金。全国范围内,处方率为 872/10 万个人。处方率在澳大利亚首都领地最高(1087/10 万),在西澳大利亚州最低(625/10 万),尽管这两个地区的 HCV 流行率与全国水平相当。

结论

在这项资金协议的头 18 个月里,DAA 的采用率很高。然而,由于保密的特殊定价协议,缺乏透明度意味着实际政府支出尚不清楚。药品福利咨询委员会的上市后审查可能使赞助商重新谈判 DAA 的价格。

相似文献

1
Uptake of and Expenditure on Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Treatment in Australia.澳大利亚丙型肝炎治疗直接作用抗病毒药物的使用和支出。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Aug;16(4):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0392-8.
2
Liver disease burden and required treatment expenditures for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Thailand: Implications for HCV elimination in the new therapeutic era, a population-based study.泰国丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的肝病负担和所需治疗支出:新治疗时代消除 HCV 的意义,一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 24;13(4):e0196301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196301. eCollection 2018.
3
Prices, Costs, and Affordability of New Medicines for Hepatitis C in 30 Countries: An Economic Analysis.30个国家丙型肝炎新药的价格、成本及可负担性:一项经济分析
PLoS Med. 2016 May 31;13(5):e1002032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002032. eCollection 2016 May.
4
Access to medicines and hepatitis C in Africa: can tiered pricing and voluntary licencing assure universal access, health equity and fairness?非洲的药品获取与丙型肝炎:分级定价和自愿许可能否确保普遍获取、健康公平与公正?
Global Health. 2017 Sep 13;13(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0297-6.
5
Estimated uptake of hepatitis C direct-acting antiviral treatment among individuals with HIV co-infection in Australia: a retrospective cohort study.澳大利亚 HIV 合并感染个体中丙型肝炎直接作用抗病毒治疗的预估吸收率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sex Health. 2020 Jun;17(3):223-230. doi: 10.1071/SH19101.
6
Drug Pricing Evolution in Hepatitis C.丙型肝炎药物定价的演变
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 16;11(6):e0157098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157098. eCollection 2016.
7
Cost-effectiveness of generic pan-genotypic sofosbuvir/velpatasvir versus genotype-dependent direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C treatment.通用泛基因型索磷布韦/维帕他韦与基于基因型的直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎的成本效益比较。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Dec;33(12):2029-2036. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14301. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
8
Real-world treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection in Germany: Analyses from drug prescription data, 2010-2015.德国慢性丙型肝炎感染的真实世界治疗:2010-2015 年药物处方数据分析。
J Hepatol. 2017 Jul;67(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
9
Economic evaluation of the hepatitis C elimination strategy in Greece in the era of affordable direct-acting antivirals.在可负担得起的直接抗病毒药物时代,希腊丙型肝炎消除策略的经济评估。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar 21;25(11):1327-1340. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i11.1327.
10
Uptake of direct-acting antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C in Australia.澳大利亚慢性丙型肝炎直接抗病毒治疗的接受情况。
J Viral Hepat. 2018 Jun;25(6):640-648. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12852. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Missed Opportunities: A Retrospective Study of Hepatitis C Testing in Hospital Inpatients.错失的机会:医院住院患者丙型肝炎检测的回顾性研究。
Viruses. 2024 Jun 18;16(6):979. doi: 10.3390/v16060979.
2
Leave No-One Behind: A Retrospective Study of Hepatitis C Testing and Linkage to Care for Hospital Inpatients.《一个不落:对医院住院患者丙型肝炎检测和与护理衔接的回顾性研究》。
Viruses. 2023 Mar 31;15(4):913. doi: 10.3390/v15040913.
3
Hepatitis C cure as a 'gathering': Attending to the social and material relations of hepatitis C treatment.
丙型肝炎的治愈之路:关注丙型肝炎治疗的社会和物质关系。
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Apr;44(4-5):830-847. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13467. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
4
The impact of public coverage of newer hepatitis C medications on utilization, adherence, and costs in British Columbia.新型丙型肝炎药物的公众报道对不列颠哥伦比亚省的利用、依从性和成本的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 1;16(3):e0247843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247843. eCollection 2021.
5
Systematic Review of Health State Utility Values Used in European Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations for Chronic Hepatitis C: Impact on Cost-Effectiveness Results.系统评价在欧洲慢性丙型肝炎药物经济学评价中使用的健康状态效用值:对成本效益结果的影响。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jan;19(1):29-44. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00600-w.