Suppr超能文献

糖尿病是颈动脉血运重建术后高风险的一个标志吗?来自单一中心的经验。

Is diabetes a marker of higher risk after carotid revascularization? Experience from a single centre.

作者信息

Casana Renato, Malloggi Chiara, Odero Andrea, Tolva Valerio, Bulbulia Richard, Halliday Alison, Silani Vincenzo

机构信息

1 Department of Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.

2 Vascular Surgery Research Experimental Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2018 Jul;15(4):314-321. doi: 10.1177/1479164118769530. Epub 2018 Apr 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This single centre study investigates the influence of diabetes mellitus on outcomes following carotid artery endarterectomy or stenting.

METHODS

In total, 752 carotid revascularizations (58.2% carotid artery stenting and 41.8% carotid endarterectomy) were performed in 221 (29.4%) patients with diabetes and 532 (70.6%) patients without diabetes. The study outcomes were death, disabling and non-disabling stroke, transient ischaemic attack and restenosis within 36 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

Patients with diabetes had higher periprocedural risk of any stroke or death (3.6% diabetes vs 0.6% no diabetes; p < 0.05), transient ischaemic attack (1.8% diabetes vs 0.2% no diabetes; p > 0.05) and restenosis (2.7% diabetes vs 0.6% no diabetes; p < 0.05). During long-term follow-up, there were no significant differences in Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from death, any stroke and transient ischaemic attack, between people with and without diabetes for each carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy subgroup. Patients with diabetes showed higher rates of restenosis during follow-up than patients without diabetes (36-months estimate risk of restenosis: 21.2% diabetes vs 12.5% no diabetes; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The presence of diabetes was associated with increased periprocedural risk, but no further additional risk emerged during longer term follow-up. Restenosis rates were higher among patients with diabetes.

摘要

目的

本单中心研究调查糖尿病对颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术后结局的影响。

方法

总共对221例(29.4%)糖尿病患者和532例(70.6%)非糖尿病患者进行了752例颈动脉血运重建术(58.2%为颈动脉支架置入术,41.8%为颈动脉内膜切除术)。研究结局包括术后36个月内的死亡、致残性和非致残性卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作和再狭窄。

结果

糖尿病患者围手术期发生任何卒中或死亡的风险更高(糖尿病患者为3.6%,非糖尿病患者为0.6%;p<0.05),短暂性脑缺血发作(糖尿病患者为1.8%,非糖尿病患者为0.2%;p>0.05)和再狭窄(糖尿病患者为2.7%,非糖尿病患者为0.6%;p<0.05)。在长期随访中,对于每个颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术亚组,糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者在Kaplan-Meier估计的无死亡、无任何卒中和无短暂性脑缺血发作方面没有显著差异。糖尿病患者随访期间的再狭窄率高于非糖尿病患者(36个月再狭窄估计风险:糖尿病患者为21.2%,非糖尿病患者为12.5%;p<0.05)。

结论

糖尿病的存在与围手术期风险增加相关,但在长期随访中未出现进一步的额外风险。糖尿病患者的再狭窄率更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验