• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后老年患者 3 年生活质量持续获益:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Sustained 3-Year Benefits in Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the Elderly: A Prospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital and Institute of Vascular Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong; Center of Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital and Institute of Vascular Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Value Health. 2018 Apr;21(4):423-431. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.004
PMID:29680099
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Impact of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is important but under-reported in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate long-term health status in elderly patients who underwent PCI.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent PCI at a university-affiliated hospital from September 2009 to June 2012 were prospectively enrolled with HRQOL assessment at baseline (up to 2 weeks before PCI) and at 6-, 12-, and 36-month follow-up using the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire descriptive profile and visual analogue scale (VAS). Minimally important benefit (MIB) in HRQOL was defined as greater than half an SD improvement in the baseline VAS score.

RESULTS

Of 1957 patients, 49.9%, 29.1%, and 21.0% were aged younger than 65 years, 65 to 74 years, and 75 years and older, respectively. Mean VAS scores at baseline (50.1 ± 20.5 vs. 51.6 ± 20.5 vs. 52.6 ± 21.8; P = 0.09) and at 36 months (72.9 ± 14.0 vs. 72.8 ± 16.1 vs. 72.0 ± 14.8; P = 0.77) were similar between the three age groups, respectively. MIB at 36 months was observed in 65.7%, 61.9%, and 61.2% of patients in each age group, respectively. Proportion of patients aged 75 years and older reporting problems in pain/discomfort and self-care reduced from 91.2% and 24.8% at baseline to 41.4% and 10.1% at 36 months, respectively (both P < 0.01). Independent predictors of MIB in HRQOL at 36 months in patients 75 years and older included poor baseline HRQOL, MIB at 6 months, and presentation with myocardial infarction (all P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients experienced sustained long-term improvement in quality of life comparable with younger patients after PCI. Our findings suggest that age per se should not deter against revascularization because of sustained benefit in HRQOL.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的影响很重要,但在老年患者中的报告不足。

目的

评估在大学附属医院接受 PCI 的老年患者的长期健康状况。

方法

连续前瞻性招募 2009 年 9 月至 2012 年 6 月在大学附属医院接受 PCI 的患者,在基线(PCI 前最多 2 周)和 6、12 和 36 个月随访时使用欧洲五维健康量表简表和视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行 HRQOL 评估。HRQOL 的最小重要获益(MIB)定义为基线 VAS 评分提高超过半标准差。

结果

1957 例患者中,年龄<65 岁、65-74 岁和≥75 岁的患者分别占 49.9%、29.1%和 21.0%。三组基线 VAS 评分(50.1±20.5 比 51.6±20.5 比 52.6±21.8;P=0.09)和 36 个月 VAS 评分(72.9±14.0 比 72.8±16.1 比 72.0±14.8;P=0.77)相似。三组患者 36 个月 MIB 分别为 65.7%、61.9%和 61.2%。基线时报告疼痛/不适和自理问题的≥75 岁患者比例分别从 91.2%和 24.8%降至 36 个月时的 41.4%和 10.1%(均 P<0.01)。75 岁及以上患者 36 个月时 HRQOL MIB 的独立预测因素包括基线 HRQOL 差、6 个月时 MIB 和心肌梗死表现(均 P<0.01)。

结论

PCI 后,老年患者的生活质量长期持续改善,与年轻患者相当。我们的研究结果表明,年龄本身不应成为阻止血管重建的因素,因为 HRQOL 持续获益。

相似文献

1
Sustained 3-Year Benefits in Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the Elderly: A Prospective Cohort Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后老年患者 3 年生活质量持续获益:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Value Health. 2018 Apr;21(4):423-431. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
2
Quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly with acute coronary syndrome.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的生活质量。
Int J Cardiol. 2012 Feb 23;155(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.09.050. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
3
Health-related quality of life in the elderly three years after percutaneous coronary intervention.老年人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗三年后的健康相关生活质量。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Jul;9(3):373-81. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I3A60.
4
Long-term clinical outcomes, health-related quality of life, and costs in different treatment modalities of stable coronary artery disease.稳定性冠心病不同治疗方式的长期临床结局、健康相关生活质量和成本。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):74-82. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcw024.
5
Quality of life in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention--radial versus femoral access (from the OCEAN RACE Trial).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的生活质量-桡动脉与股动脉入路(来自 OCEAN RACE 试验)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Aug 15;114(4):516-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.030. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
6
A systematic review on the quality of life benefits after percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly.关于老年患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后生活质量获益的系统评价。
Cardiology. 2014;129(1):46-54. doi: 10.1159/000360603. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
7
In-hospital outcomes of very elderly patients (85 years and older) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.高龄(85 岁及以上)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的院内转归。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Apr 1;77(5):634-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22729. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
8
Preliminary report on a cost-utility analysis of revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention for ischemic heart disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗缺血性心脏病血运重建的成本效用分析初步报告
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2017 Apr;32(2):127-136. doi: 10.1007/s12928-016-0401-5. Epub 2016 May 26.
9
The impact of age on outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery versus stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: one-year results from the Stent or Surgery (SoS) trial.年龄对冠状动脉搭桥手术与支架辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后结局的影响:支架或手术(SoS)试验的一年结果
Am Heart J. 2006 Dec;152(6):1153-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.06.011.
10
In-hospital and long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion in elderly patients: A consecutive, prospective, single-centre study.老年患者慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的院内及长期结局:一项连续、前瞻性、单中心研究。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Jan;109(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with health-related quality of life in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Thai PCI registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者健康相关生活质量的相关因素:泰国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 8;10:1260993. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1260993. eCollection 2023.
2
Quality of Life in Patients With Unstable Angina Before and After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Single-Center Pilot Study Using the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前后不稳定型心绞痛患者的生活质量:一项使用欧洲生活质量五维度五级(EQ-5D-5L)问卷的单中心试点研究
Cureus. 2023 Sep 25;15(9):e45886. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45886. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Sex differences in quality of life of patients following percutaneous coronary intervention in Vietnam.
越南经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者生活质量的性别差异。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Jan;32(1):71-79. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03237-5. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
4
Relationship between dynamic changes of peri-procedure anxiety and short-term prognosis in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary heart disease: A single-center, prospective study.择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠心病患者围术期焦虑动态变化与短期预后的关系:一项单中心前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 1;17(4):e0266006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266006. eCollection 2022.
5
Quality of Life Changes in Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征患者生活质量变化的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 21;17(18):6889. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186889.
6
Should Percutaneous Coronary Intervention be the Standard Treatment Strategy for Significant Coronary Artery Disease in all Octogenarians?高龄 80 岁以上患者的严重冠状动脉疾病是否应采用经皮冠状动脉介入治疗作为标准治疗策略?
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(3):244-259. doi: 10.2174/1573403X16666200903153823.