Watanabe Daisuke, Mizukami Akiko, Holl Katsiaryna, Curran Desmond, Van Oorschot Desirée, Varghese Lijoy, Shiragami Makoto
Department of Dermatology, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
GSK, Akasaka Intercity AIR, 1-8-1, Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2018 Jun;8(2):269-284. doi: 10.1007/s13555-018-0236-3. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
The aim of this study was to compare the public health impact of introducing two herpes zoster (HZ) vaccines into the vaccination programs for the Japanese population aged ≥ 50 years: a single-dose Varicella Vaccine Live (VVL) or a two-dose adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (RZV).
A multi-cohort static Markov model was developed to follow age cohorts (50-59, 60-69, 70-79 and ≥ 80 years) over their remaining lifetime. Japan-specific data inputs for the model were obtained from Japanese data sources. Age-stratified vaccine efficacy and waning rates were based on published clinical trial data. In the base-case analysis, vaccine coverage was assumed to be 40% for both vaccines, and compliance with second-dose of the RZV vaccine was set to 95%.
Vaccination with RZV was projected to prevent approximately 3.3 million HZ cases, 692,000 cases of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), and 281,000 cases of other complications, compared with the prevention of 0.8 million HZ cases, 216,000 PHN cases, and 57,000 other complications with vaccination with VVL. The number of individuals needed to vaccinate in order to prevent one HZ case ranged from 6 to 14 using RZV (depending on age and assumed second-dose compliance) and from 21 to 138 depending on age using VVL. By preventing a higher number of HZ cases and its complications, RZV vaccination led to fewer outpatient visits and hospitalizations than vaccination with VVL.
Both vaccines had a positive public health impact compared to no vaccination, but due to its higher vaccine efficacy, RZV demonstrated a superior public health impact compared with VVL.
GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.
本研究旨在比较将两种带状疱疹(HZ)疫苗引入日本50岁及以上人群疫苗接种计划的公共卫生影响:单剂量水痘减毒活疫苗(VVL)或两剂量含佐剂重组带状疱疹疫苗(RZV)。
建立了一个多队列静态马尔可夫模型,以跟踪年龄队列(50 - 59岁、60 - 69岁、70 - 79岁和80岁及以上)的余生。该模型的日本特定数据输入来自日本数据源。年龄分层的疫苗效力和衰减率基于已发表的临床试验数据。在基础病例分析中,假设两种疫苗的接种覆盖率均为40%,RZV疫苗第二剂的依从性设定为95%。
预计接种RZV可预防约330万例HZ病例、69.2万例带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)病例和28.1万例其他并发症,而接种VVL可预防80万例HZ病例、21.6万例PHN病例和5.7万例其他并发症。使用RZV预防一例HZ病例所需接种的人数在6至14人之间(取决于年龄和假设的第二剂依从性),使用VVL则在21至138人之间(取决于年龄)。通过预防更多的HZ病例及其并发症,与接种VVL相比,接种RZV导致的门诊就诊和住院次数更少。
与未接种疫苗相比,两种疫苗都有积极的公共卫生影响,但由于其更高的疫苗效力,RZV与VVL相比显示出更优的公共卫生影响。
葛兰素史克生物制品公司。