Long Changquan, Sun Qian, Jia Shiwei, Li Peng, Chen Antao
Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of the Ministry of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Apr 6;12:135. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00135. eCollection 2018.
People are strongly motivated to pursue social equality during social interactions. Previous studies have shown that outcome equality influences the neural activities of monetary feedback processing in socioeconomic games; however, it remains unclear whether perception of opportunity equality affects outcome evaluation even when outcomes are maintained equal. The current study investigated the electrophysiological activities of outcome evaluation in different instructed opportunity equality conditions with event-related potentials (ERPs). Participants were asked to play a competitive dice game against an opponent to win money. Opportunity equality was manipulated in three conditions, depending on whether participants were allowed the opportunity to throw less, equal, or more dice compared to their opponents. Although participants received a winning outcome with approximately 50% chance in all equality conditions, they selectively exhibited sensitivity to the less-dice condition by reporting stronger feelings of unfairness and unpleasantness than in the equal and more-dice conditions. In line with the behavioral results, larger reward positivity amplitudes were elicited by the monetary outcome in the less-dice condition than in the other two conditions, reflecting intensified reward prediction error (RPE) signals under negative emotional arousal. Further, P3 amplitudes were enhanced following reward feedback only in the unequal conditions, perhaps due to the high-level motivational and affective processing associated with resolving conflict between social norms and self-interest. The present findings elucidate the complex temporal course of outcome evaluation processes in different opportunity equality conditions.
在社交互动中,人们强烈渴望追求社会平等。先前的研究表明,结果平等会影响社会经济博弈中货币反馈处理的神经活动;然而,即便结果保持平等,机会平等的认知是否会影响结果评估仍不清楚。本研究采用事件相关电位(ERP),调查了在不同指示的机会平等条件下结果评估的电生理活动。参与者被要求与对手玩一场竞争性掷骰子游戏以赢钱。机会平等在三种条件下进行操控,这取决于与对手相比,参与者被允许掷更少、相等或更多骰子的机会。尽管在所有平等条件下,参与者获得胜利结果的几率约为50%,但他们通过报告比在相等和更多骰子条件下更强烈的不公平感和不愉快感,对更少骰子条件表现出了选择性敏感。与行为结果一致,在更少骰子条件下,货币结果引发的奖励正波幅度比其他两种条件下更大,反映出在负面情绪唤醒下奖励预测误差(RPE)信号增强。此外,仅在不平等条件下,奖励反馈后P3波幅增强,这可能是由于与解决社会规范和自身利益之间的冲突相关的高级动机和情感处理。本研究结果阐明了不同机会平等条件下结果评估过程的复杂时间进程。