Borkar Sachin Anil, Singh Manmohanjit, Kale Shashank Sharad, Suri Ashish, Chandra Poodipedi Sarat, Kumar Rajender, Sharma Bhawani Shankar, Gaikwad Shailesh, Mahapatra Ashok Kumar
Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Neuroradiolgy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Asian J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr-Jun;13(2):238-246. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.228512.
Cerebral vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. Despite various treatment modalities, the optimal management of vasospasm remains elusive. In this regard; we undertook a prospective, randomized controlled study to evaluate the effectiveness of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage (LCSFD) for prevention of cerebral vasospasm and its sequelae.
Patients with aneurysmal SAH who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups - Group I (30 patients) underwent LCSFD whereas Group II (30 patients) did not undergo LCSFD. All patients underwent aneurysmal clipping. Both the groups received standard neurosurgical treatment except for LCSFD. The outcome was measured in terms of (1) clinically evident vasospasm; (2) vasospasm-related cerebral infarction; (3) condition of the patient at the time of discharge; and (4) Glasgow outcome score (GOS) at 1- and 3-month follow-up.
LCSFD conferred a statistically significant benefit reducing the incidence of clinical vasospasm from 63% (in non-LCSFD group) to 30% (in LCSFD group) ( = 0.01) and incidence of vasospasm-related cerebral infarction from 53% (in non-LCSFD group) to 20% (in LCSFD group) ( = 0.007). Incidence of vasospasm was quantitatively lower in LCSFD group across all Hunt and Hess grades; however, it was statistically significant in SAH Grade III ( = 0.008). Mean duration of hospital stay was slightly lower in LCSFD group compared to non-LCSFD group; however, it did not reach statistical significance. A higher incidence of meningitis in LCSFD group was not statistically significant. A higher GOS was observed in LCSFD group at 1- and 3-month follow-up as compared to non-LCSFD group.
Drainage of CSF through a lumbar drain following aneurysmal SAH caused a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of clinical and radiological vasospasm and its sequelae. It also shortens the overall duration of hospital stay and improves the outcome as evidenced by a better GOS score at 1- and 3-month follow-up. The results of this prospective, randomized study establish the efficacy of LCSFD in prevention of vasospasm following aneurysmal SAH.
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后的脑血管痉挛是导致死亡和致残的主要原因。尽管有多种治疗方式,但脑血管痉挛的最佳管理方法仍不明确。在这方面,我们进行了一项前瞻性随机对照研究,以评估腰椎脑脊液引流(LCSFD)预防脑血管痉挛及其后遗症的有效性。
符合纳入标准的动脉瘤性SAH患者被随机分为两组——第一组(30例患者)接受LCSFD,而第二组(30例患者)未接受LCSFD。所有患者均接受动脉瘤夹闭术。除LCSFD外,两组均接受标准的神经外科治疗。通过以下方面衡量结果:(1)临床明显的血管痉挛;(2)与血管痉挛相关的脑梗死;(3)出院时患者的状况;以及(4)1个月和3个月随访时的格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)。
LCSFD带来了统计学上的显著益处,将临床血管痉挛的发生率从63%(非LCSFD组)降至30%(LCSFD组)(P = 0.01),并将与血管痉挛相关的脑梗死发生率从53%(非LCSFD组)降至20%(LCSFD组)(P = 0.007)。在所有Hunt和Hess分级中,LCSFD组的血管痉挛发生率在数量上均较低;然而,在SAHⅢ级中具有统计学意义(P = 0.008)。与非LCSFD组相比,LCSFD组的平均住院时间略短,但未达到统计学意义。LCSFD组中较高的脑膜炎发生率无统计学意义。与非LCSFD组相比,LCSFD组在1个月和3个月随访时的GOS较高。
动脉瘤性SAH后通过腰椎引流管引流脑脊液可使临床和影像学血管痉挛及其后遗症的发生率在统计学上显著降低。它还缩短了总体住院时间,并改善了预后,1个月和3个月随访时更好的GOS评分证明了这一点。这项前瞻性随机研究的结果证实了LCSFD在预防动脉瘤性SAH后血管痉挛方面的疗效。