Suppr超能文献

动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后症状性脑积水患者中腰大池引流与脑室外引流安全性的比较。

Comparison of safety of lumbar drain versus external ventricular drain in symptomatic hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

作者信息

Chao Kuo, Martin Daniel, Tsouvalas Charles, Wiginton James, Torres Fernando, Nguyen Nathan

机构信息

Interventional Neuroradiology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Pulmonary & Intensive Care, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug 21:15910199241276676. doi: 10.1177/15910199241276676.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion is typically performed with an external ventricular drain (EVD) for symptomatic hydrocephalus (HCP) following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Lumbar drain (LD) has also been studied to reduce the incidence of vasospasm after SAH but not HCP. We performed a single center retrospective analysis to evaluate the safety of LD versus EVD for symptomatic HCP following aneurysmal SAH in a naturally randomized patient population.

METHODS

Patients admitted for aneurysmal SAH who developed symptomatic HCP were treated with EVD or LD depending on neurosurgeon on call. Of the 10 neurosurgeons on call, five would place EVD in all patients while the other five would request LD be placed by interventional neuroradiology; however, the distribution on call was not evenly distributed. We retrospectively compared these two groups for drain complications and outcomes with Modified Rankin Scale (mRS).

RESULTS

From 2018 to 2021, there were a total of 77 patients with aneurysmal SAH requiring CSF diversion for HCP. There were 56 cases of EVD placement and 21 cases of LD placement. Overall drain complications were 32.0% of cases with EVD and 9.5% with LD,  = .0773. EVD versus LD complications consisted of hemorrhage (1.8% vs 0%,  = 1.0000), infection (7.1 vs 0%,  = .5698), clogged (25% vs 0%,  = .008), dislodgement (1.8% vs 4.6%,  = .4737) and replacement (16% vs 4.8%,  = .2698). No case of cerebellar tonsillar herniation occurred. mRS between EVD versus LD obtained at baseline (0.3 vs 0.3,  = .3943), discharge (3.8 vs 2.7,  = .047), 90 days (2.9 vs 2.0,  = .060), and 1 year (2.6 vs 1.6,  = .081). One year mortality rates between EVD versus LD (26.8% vs 19.0%,  = .483).

CONCLUSION

Symptomatic HCP after aneurysmal SAH can be effectively and safely treated with LD. LD had lower overall complications than EVD with no hemorrhage, infection or malfunction. Further prospective randomized control study may be helpful in elucidating optimal CSF diversion for patients with symptomatic HCP.

摘要

背景与目的

对于蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后出现症状性脑积水(HCP)的患者,通常采用外部脑室引流(EVD)进行脑脊液(CSF)分流。也有研究使用腰大池引流(LD)来降低SAH后血管痉挛的发生率,但不是用于HCP。我们进行了一项单中心回顾性分析,以评估在自然随机分组的患者群体中,LD与EVD治疗动脉瘤性SAH后症状性HCP的安全性。

方法

因动脉瘤性SAH入院且出现症状性HCP的患者,根据值班神经外科医生的安排接受EVD或LD治疗。在10位值班神经外科医生中,5位会对所有患者放置EVD,另外5位会要求介入神经放射科放置LD;然而,值班安排并不均匀。我们回顾性比较了这两组患者的引流并发症及改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分结果。

结果

2018年至2021年,共有77例动脉瘤性SAH患者因HCP需要进行CSF分流。其中56例行EVD放置,21例行LD放置。总体引流并发症在EVD组为32.0%,在LD组为9.5%,P = 0.0773。EVD与LD的并发症包括出血(1.8%对0%,P = 1.0000)、感染(7.1%对0%,P = 0.5698)、堵塞(25%对0%,P = 0.008)、移位(1.8%对4.6%,P = 0.4737)和更换(16%对4.8%,P = 0.2698)。未发生小脑扁桃体疝病例。EVD组与LD组在基线时的mRS评分(0.3对0.3,P = 0.3943)、出院时(3.8对2.7,P = 0.047)、90天时(2.9对2.0,P = 0.060)和1年时(2.6对1.6,P = 0.081)。EVD组与LD组的1年死亡率(26.8%对19.0%,P = 0.483)。

结论

动脉瘤性SAH后的症状性HCP可用LD进行有效且安全的治疗。LD的总体并发症低于EVD,且无出血、感染或功能故障。进一步的前瞻性随机对照研究可能有助于阐明症状性HCP患者的最佳CSF分流方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015 Jul;27(3):222-40. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000130.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验