a Department of Rehabilitation Sciences , University of Leuven (KU Leuven) , Leuven , Belgium.
b Institute of Physiotherapy , Kantonsspital Winterthur , Winterthur , Switzerland.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2019 Oct;35(10):995-1003. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1461285. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
The Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists (PABS-PT) is a questionnaire that is frequently used to measure the treatment orientation of physiotherapists and other healthcare providers toward low back pain (LBP). Previous validation studies of the PABS-PT have reported consistently that exploratory factor analysis (EFA) yielded a two-factor model with the factors "biomedical" and "biopsychosocial." However, there remain concerns regarding the composition of these two factors and the internal consistency of the "biopsychosocial" factor. The objective of this study was to replicate the previous validation study on the German PABS-PT. EFA was implemented to reexamine the underlying structure of the scale, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the fit of the hypothesized two-factor model. Results of the initial validation study were not replicated. EFA indicated that a two-factor solution is an inadequate representation of the PABS-PT data, and CFA showed insufficient fit of the hypothesized two-factor model to the PABS-PT data. Our results indicate a need for caution when using the PABS-PT to measure physiotherapists' orientation toward LBP, particularly in measuring the magnitude of a biopsychosocial orientation.
《物理治疗师疼痛态度和信念量表》(PABS-PT)是一种常用于测量物理治疗师和其他医疗保健提供者对腰痛(LBP)的治疗方向的问卷。先前对 PABS-PT 的验证研究一致报告,探索性因子分析(EFA)产生了一个具有“生物医学”和“生物心理社会”两个因子的两因素模型。然而,人们仍然对这两个因素的组成以及“生物心理社会”因素的内部一致性表示关注。本研究的目的是复制德国 PABS-PT 的先前验证研究。实施了探索性因子分析(EFA)以重新检查量表的基础结构,并使用验证性因子分析(CFA)来测试假设的两因素模型的拟合度。初步验证研究的结果没有得到复制。EFA 表明,两因素解决方案不能充分代表 PABS-PT 数据,CFA 显示假设的两因素模型对 PABS-PT 数据的拟合度不足。我们的结果表明,在使用 PABS-PT 测量物理治疗师对 LBP 的治疗方向时,特别是在测量生物心理社会方向的程度时,需要谨慎。