School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Research Institute of Sun Yat-sen University in Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018 Sep;126:181-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
Mikania micrantha and Mikania cordata are the only two species in genus Mikania (Asteraceae) in China. They share very similar morphological and life-history characteristics but occupy quite different habitats. Most importantly, they generate totally different ecological consequences. While M. micrantha has become an exotic invasive weed, M. cordata exists as an indigenous species with no harmful effects on native plants or habitats. As a continuous study of our previously reported M. micrantha chloroplast (cp) genome, in this study we have further sequenced the M. cordata cp genome to (1) conduct a comparative genome analysis to gain insights into the mechanism of invasiveness; (2) develop cp markers to examine the population genetic adaptation of M. micrantha; and (3) screen variable genome regions of phylogenetic utility. The M. cordata chloroplast genome is 151,984 bp in length and displays a typical quadripartite structure. The number and distribution of protein coding genes, tRNA genes, and rRNA genes of M. cordata are identical to those of M. micrantha. The main difference lays in that the pseudogenization of ndhF and a 118-bp palindromic repeat only arises in M. cordata. Fourteen highly divergent regions, 235 base substitutions, and 58 indels were identified between the two cp genomes. Phylogenetic inferences revealed a sister relationship between M. micrantha and M. cordata whose divergence was estimated to occur around 1.78 million years ago (MYA). Twelve cpSSR loci were detected to be polymorphic and adopted to survey the genetic adaptation of M. micrantha populations. No cpSSR loci were found to undergo selection. Our results build a foundation to examine the invasive mechanism of Mikania weed.
微甘菊和大花微甘菊是中国仅有的两种微甘菊属(菊科)物种。它们具有非常相似的形态和生活史特征,但占据着截然不同的栖息地。最重要的是,它们产生了完全不同的生态后果。微甘菊已成为外来入侵杂草,而大花微甘菊则是一种本土物种,对本地植物或栖息地没有有害影响。作为我们之前报道的微甘菊叶绿体(cp)基因组的持续研究,在本研究中,我们进一步测序了大花微甘菊的 cp 基因组,以(1)进行比较基因组分析,以深入了解其入侵机制;(2)开发 cp 标记来研究微甘菊的种群遗传适应;(3)筛选具有系统发育学用途的可变基因组区域。大花微甘菊叶绿体基因组长 151984bp,呈现出典型的四分体结构。大花微甘菊的蛋白编码基因、tRNA 基因和 rRNA 基因的数量和分布与微甘菊相同。主要区别在于,ndhF 的假基因化和 118bp 回文重复仅在大花微甘菊中出现。在这两个 cp 基因组之间鉴定出 14 个高度分化的区域、235 个碱基替换和 58 个插入缺失。系统发育推断显示,微甘菊和大花微甘菊是姐妹关系,它们的分化发生在大约 178 万年前(MYA)。检测到 12 个 cpSSR 位点多态性,并用于调查微甘菊种群的遗传适应。没有发现 cpSSR 位点经历选择。我们的结果为研究微甘菊杂草的入侵机制奠定了基础。