• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者对培养肉的接受度:系统综述。

Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Meat Sci. 2018 Sep;143:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.008
PMID:29684844
Abstract

Cultured meat grown in-vitro from animal cells is being developed as a way of addressing many of the ethical and environmental concerns associated with conventional meat production. As commercialisation of this technology appears increasingly feasible, there is growing interest in the research on consumer acceptance of cultured meat. We present a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature, and synthesize and analyse the findings of 14 empirical studies. We highlight demographic variations in consumer acceptance, factors influencing acceptance, common consumer objections, perceived benefits, and areas of uncertainty. We conclude by evaluating the most important objections and benefits to consumers, as well as highlighting areas for future research.

摘要

从动物细胞体外培养的培养肉被开发为解决与传统肉类生产相关的许多伦理和环境问题的一种方法。随着这项技术的商业化越来越可行,人们对消费者对培养肉的接受程度的研究越来越感兴趣。我们对同行评议文献进行了系统综述,并综合分析了 14 项实证研究的结果。我们强调了消费者接受程度的人口统计学差异、影响接受程度的因素、常见的消费者反对意见、感知到的好处以及不确定的领域。最后,我们评估了消费者最关心的反对意见和好处,并强调了未来研究的领域。

相似文献

1
Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic review.消费者对培养肉的接受度:系统综述。
Meat Sci. 2018 Sep;143:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
Review of factors affecting consumer acceptance of cultured meat.影响消费者对实验室培育肉接受度的因素综述。
Appetite. 2022 Mar 1;170:105829. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105829. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
3
Guinea pig for meat production: A systematic review of factors affecting the production, carcass and meat quality.肉用豚鼠生产:影响生产、胴体和肉质的因素的系统评价。
Meat Sci. 2018 Sep;143:165-176. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 5.
4
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
5
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
6
Pink slimed: Media framing of novel food technologies and risk related to ground beef and processed foods in the U.S.粉色黏液:美国媒体对新型食品技术和碎牛肉及加工食品相关风险的报道
Meat Sci. 2018 Sep;143:242-251. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
7
Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption.用于更健康食品或非酒精饮料购买及消费的营养标签。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 27;2(2):CD009315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2.
8
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives in the Scientific Literature on the Barriers and Benefits of the Transition to a Plant-Based Diet: A Bibliometric Analysis.科学文献中关于向植物性饮食转变的障碍与益处的观点:一项文献计量分析
Foods. 2025 Aug 23;14(17):2942. doi: 10.3390/foods14172942.
2
Sustainability Views and Intentions to Reduce Beef Consumption: An International Web-Based Survey.可持续发展观与减少牛肉消费的意愿:一项基于网络的国际调查。
Foods. 2025 Jul 26;14(15):2620. doi: 10.3390/foods14152620.
3
Consumer Acceptance of Alternative Proteins: Exploring Determinants of the Consumer Willingness to Buy in Germany.
消费者对替代蛋白的接受度:探索德国消费者购买意愿的决定因素。
Foods. 2025 Jul 9;14(14):2427. doi: 10.3390/foods14142427.
4
Beyond Meat Substitution: A Multifaceted Review of Plant-Based and Alternative Proteins, from Environmental Impact to Analytical Technologies.超越肉类替代:对植物性和替代性蛋白质的多方面综述,从环境影响到分析技术
Foods. 2025 Jun 30;14(13):2312. doi: 10.3390/foods14132312.
5
A Multidisciplinary View on Animal Welfare and Alternative Protein: Convergences and Perspectives from Professionals in Agricultural, Food, and Veterinary Sciences.关于动物福利与替代蛋白质的多学科观点:农业、食品和兽医学专业人士的共识与展望
Foods. 2025 Jun 19;14(12):2140. doi: 10.3390/foods14122140.
6
Publicly tasting cultivated meat and socially constructing perceived value politics and identity.公开品尝人造肉并在社会层面构建感知到的价值政治与身份认同。
NPJ Sci Food. 2025 Jun 4;9(1):94. doi: 10.1038/s41538-025-00449-0.
7
A Systematic Literature Review of Cultured Meat Through the Conceptual Frameworks of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem and Global Value Chain.通过创业生态系统和全球价值链概念框架对 cultured meat 的系统文献综述 。 注:这里“cultured meat”直译为“培养肉”,也常被称为“人造肉” 。
Foods. 2025 Mar 5;14(5):885. doi: 10.3390/foods14050885.
8
How much do opinions regarding cultivated meat vary within the same country? The cases of São Paulo and Salvador, Brazil.在同一个国家内,人们对人造肉的看法差异有多大?以巴西圣保罗和萨尔瓦多为例。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 19;20(2):e0317956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317956. eCollection 2025.
9
Environmental Impact of Meat Protein Substitutes: A Mini-Review.肉类蛋白质替代品的环境影响:一篇综述短文
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2025 Jan;45(1):62-80. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e109. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
10
A Review on the Application of Animal-Based Materials Using Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing and Protein Restructuring Technologies.基于动物材料的三维(3D)打印与蛋白质重组技术应用综述
Food Sci Anim Resour. 2025 Jan;45(1):282-302. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e132. Epub 2025 Jan 1.