Kang Sean Hk, Eglington Luke G, Yap Melvin J
1 Department of Education, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
2 Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jul;71(7):1506-1511. doi: 10.1177/1747021818775051. Epub 2018 May 23.
Separate processes underlying forward (e.g., crescent MOON) and backward (e.g., office POST) priming have previously been inferred from button-press lexical decision response times, with an automatic prospective mechanism and a strategic retrospective mechanism presumed responsible for forward and backward priming, respectively. We tracked hand/mouse kinematics during lexical decision, and found that forward, backward, and symmetrical (e.g., cat DOG) priming exhibited different movement trajectories, with the effect of forward priming emerging earlier than that of backward priming and with symmetrical priming taking the lead around the time when the backward priming effect came online. The findings provide strong converging evidence for different mechanisms driving forward and backward priming, and demonstrate that continuous kinematic measures can shed light on cognitive processes as they unfold in real time.
先前已从按键词汇判断反应时间中推断出正向(例如,新月形的“MOON”)和反向(例如,办公室的“POST”)启动背后的不同过程,假定一种自动前瞻性机制和一种策略性回顾性机制分别负责正向和反向启动。我们在词汇判断过程中跟踪了手部/鼠标的运动学,发现正向、反向和对称(例如,猫“CAT”狗“DOG”)启动表现出不同的运动轨迹,正向启动的效果比反向启动出现得更早,并且在反向启动效果出现时左右对称启动领先。这些发现为驱动正向和反向启动的不同机制提供了强有力的聚合证据,并表明连续的运动学测量可以揭示认知过程实时展开的情况。