Heyman Tom, Van Rensbergen Bram, Storms Gert, Hutchison Keith A, De Deyne Simon
Department of Experimental Psychology.
Department of Psychology, Montana State University.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):911-20. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000050. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
The present research examines the nature of the different processes that have been proposed to underlie semantic priming. Specifically, it has been argued that priming arises as a result of automatic target activation and/or the use of strategies like prospective expectancy generation and retrospective semantic matching. This article investigates the extent that these processes rely on cognitive resources by experimentally manipulating working memory load. To disentangle prospective and retrospective processes, prime-target pairs were selected such that they were symmetrically associated (e.g., answer-question; SYM) or asymmetrically associated in either the forward direction (e.g., panda-bear; FA) or the backward direction (e.g., ball-catch; BA). The results showed that priming for FA pairs completely evaporated under a high working memory load but that it remained stable for BA and SYM pairs. This was taken to mean that prospective processes, which are assumed to cause FA priming, require cognitive resources, whereas retrospective processes, which lead to BA priming, are relatively effortless.
本研究考察了被认为是语义启动基础的不同过程的性质。具体而言,有人认为启动是自动目标激活和/或使用诸如前瞻性预期生成和回顾性语义匹配等策略的结果。本文通过实验操纵工作记忆负荷,研究了这些过程对认知资源的依赖程度。为了区分前瞻性和回顾性过程,选择了启动-目标对,使得它们在正向(例如,熊猫-熊;FA)或反向(例如,球-接球;BA)方向上对称关联(例如,答案-问题;SYM)或不对称关联。结果表明,在高工作记忆负荷下,FA对的启动完全消失,但BA对和SYM对的启动保持稳定。这意味着被认为导致FA启动的前瞻性过程需要认知资源,而导致BA启动的回顾性过程相对轻松。