Suppr超能文献

老年人健康促进干预措施的经济评估:应用经济学研究是否应对了方法学挑战?

Economic evaluation of health promotion interventions for older people: do applied economic studies meet the methodological challenges?

作者信息

Huter Kai, Dubas-Jakóbczyk Katarzyna, Kocot Ewa, Kissimova-Skarbek Katarzyna, Rothgang Heinz

机构信息

1SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany.

2High-profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Apr 16;16:14. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0100-4. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the light of demographic developments health promotion interventions for older people are gaining importance. In addition to methodological challenges arising from the economic evaluation of health promotion interventions in general, there are specific methodological problems for the particular target group of older people. There are especially four main methodological challenges that are discussed in the literature. They concern measurement and valuation of informal caregiving, accounting for productivity costs, effects of unrelated cost in added life years and the inclusion of 'beyond-health' benefits. This paper focuses on the question whether and to what extent specific methodological requirements are actually met in applied health economic evaluations.

METHODS

Following a systematic review of pertinent health economic evaluations, the included studies are analysed on the basis of four assessment criteria that are derived from methodological debates on the economic evaluation of health promotion interventions in general and economic evaluations targeting older people in particular.

RESULTS

Of the 37 studies included in the systematic review, only very few include cost and outcome categories discussed as being of specific relevance to the assessment of health promotion interventions for older people. The few studies that consider these aspects use very heterogeneous methods, thus there is no common methodological standard.

CONCLUSION

There is a strong need for the development of guidelines to achieve better comparability and to include cost categories and outcomes that are relevant for older people. Disregarding these methodological obstacles could implicitly lead to discrimination against the elderly in terms of health promotion and disease prevention and, hence, an age-based rationing of public health care.

摘要

背景

鉴于人口结构的变化,针对老年人的健康促进干预措施正变得越来越重要。除了健康促进干预措施经济评估中普遍存在的方法学挑战外,针对老年这一特定目标群体还存在特殊的方法学问题。文献中特别讨论了四个主要的方法学挑战。它们涉及非正式照护的衡量和估值、生产力成本的核算、额外生命年中无关成本的影响以及“健康之外”益处的纳入。本文关注的问题是,在应用健康经济评估中,是否以及在多大程度上实际满足了特定的方法学要求。

方法

在对相关健康经济评估进行系统综述之后,根据从关于健康促进干预措施经济评估的方法学辩论中得出的四个评估标准,对纳入的研究进行分析,这些辩论尤其针对针对老年人的经济评估。

结果

在系统综述纳入的37项研究中,只有极少数研究纳入了被认为与评估老年人健康促进干预措施特别相关的成本和结果类别。少数考虑这些方面的研究使用了非常不同的方法,因此没有共同的方法学标准。

结论

迫切需要制定指南,以实现更好的可比性,并纳入与老年人相关的成本类别和结果。忽视这些方法学障碍可能会在健康促进和疾病预防方面隐含地导致对老年人的歧视,从而导致基于年龄的公共卫生保健配给。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae36/5902889/ccec11ab3d1f/12962_2018_100_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验