Bogetz Alyssa L, Orlov Nicola, Blankenburg Rebecca, Bhavaraju Vasudha, McQueen Alisa, Rassbach Caroline
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Apr;10(2):176-184. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00447.1.
Residents may view feedback from patients and their families with greater skepticism than feedback from supervisors and peers. While discussing patient and family feedback with faculty may improve residents' acceptance of feedback and learning, specific strategies have not been identified.
We explored pediatrics residents' perspectives of patient feedback and identified strategies that promote residents' reflection on and learning from feedback.
In this multi-institutional, qualitative study conducted in June and July 2016, we conducted focus groups with a purposive sample of pediatrics residents after their participation in a randomized controlled trial in which they received written patient feedback and either discussed it with faculty or reviewed it independently. Focus group transcripts were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes using the constant comparative approach associated with grounded theory.
Thirty-six of 92 (39%) residents participated in 7 focus groups. Four themes emerged: (1) residents valued patient feedback but felt it may lack the specificity they desire; (2) discussing feedback with a trusted faculty member was helpful for self-reflection; (3) residents identified 5 strategies faculty used to facilitate their openness to and acceptance of patient feedback (eg, help resident overcome emotional responses to feedback and situate feedback in the context of lifelong learning); and (4) residents' perceptions of feedback credibility improved when faculty observed patient encounters and solicited feedback on the resident's behalf prior to discussions.
Discussing patient feedback with faculty provided important scaffolding to enhance residents' openness to and reflection on patient feedback.
住院医师可能对来自患者及其家属的反馈比来自上级和同行的反馈持更大的怀疑态度。虽然与教员讨论患者和家属的反馈可能会提高住院医师对反馈的接受度和学习效果,但尚未确定具体策略。
我们探讨了儿科住院医师对患者反馈的看法,并确定了促进住院医师对反馈进行反思和学习的策略。
在2016年6月和7月进行的这项多机构定性研究中,我们对参与一项随机对照试验的儿科住院医师进行了焦点小组访谈,这些住院医师收到了书面的患者反馈,要么与教员讨论,要么独立查看。焦点小组访谈记录进行了录音、转录,并使用与扎根理论相关的持续比较法分析主题。
92名住院医师中有36名(39%)参加了7个焦点小组。出现了四个主题:(1)住院医师重视患者反馈,但认为其可能缺乏他们期望的具体性;(2)与值得信赖的教员讨论反馈有助于自我反思;(3)住院医师确定了教员用来促进他们对患者反馈的开放性和接受度的5种策略(例如,帮助住院医师克服对反馈的情绪反应,并将反馈置于终身学习的背景下);(4)当教员观察患者会诊并在讨论前代表住院医师征求反馈时,住院医师对反馈可信度的看法有所改善。
与教员讨论患者反馈为增强住院医师对患者反馈的开放性和反思提供了重要的支持。