Suppr超能文献

双盲针灸针:一项多针、多疗程随机可行性研究。

Double-blind acupuncture needles: a multi-needle, multi-session randomized feasibility study.

作者信息

Schlaeger Judith M, Takakura Nobuari, Yajima Hiroyoshi, Takayama Miho, Steffen Alana D, Gabzdyl Elizabeth M, Nisi Robyn A, McGowan Gruber Kathleen, Bussell Jason M, Wilkie Diana J

机构信息

1Department of Women, Children and Family Health Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 S. Damen (M/C 802), Chicago, IL 60612 USA.

2Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences, 2-9-1 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-0063 Japan.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Apr 13;4:72. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0265-9. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of acupuncture is difficult to demonstrate without a feasible double-blind milieu. Double-blind acupuncture needles have been validated in single session protocols with one or two needles but not been tested in a protocol requiring many needles and repeated sessions.

METHODS

We determined the feasibility of a 13-needle, 10-session study protocol. Feasibility focused on (1) enrolling and retaining participants; (2) two acupuncturists accurately implementing a double-blind, multi-needle, multi-session protocol; (3) participants completing measures; and (4) protocol acceptability to participants. In this double-blind randomized controlled pilot study, participants were randomized 1:1 to a penetrating needle group or a skin-touch placebo control group.

RESULTS

Six women with vulvodynia (mean age 31.5 ± 8 years; five white, non-Latina, one black/African American) met the eligibility requirements, consented to participation, and were enrolled. All six participants (100%) completed the 10-session study protocol in 5 weeks without missing any treatment sessions. Per observed checklist documented technique, two acupuncturists flawlessly administered the 13-needle, 10-session acupuncture protocol; no needles malfunctioned. Six participants attended all sessions and completed 99% of measurement items. One participant did not like acupuncture (60% acceptability score) and five liked acupuncture (100% acceptability scores); the mean acceptability score was 93.3%.

CONCLUSION

Study feasibility was supported. This protocol can be used in a double-blind efficacy trial of acupuncture for vulvodynia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02704234. Registered 30 November 2015.

摘要

背景

在缺乏可行的双盲环境的情况下,针灸的疗效很难得到证实。双盲针灸针已在单疗程使用一到两根针的方案中得到验证,但尚未在需要多根针和重复疗程的方案中进行测试。

方法

我们确定了一项使用13根针、进行10个疗程的研究方案的可行性。可行性集中在以下几个方面:(1)招募并留住参与者;(2)两名针灸师准确实施双盲、多针、多疗程方案;(3)参与者完成各项测量;(4)方案对参与者的可接受性。在这项双盲随机对照试验性研究中,参与者按1:1随机分为透刺针组或皮肤接触安慰剂对照组。

结果

六名患有外阴痛的女性(平均年龄31.5±8岁;五名白人、非拉丁裔,一名黑人/非裔美国人)符合入选标准,同意参与并被纳入研究。所有六名参与者(100%)在5周内完成了10个疗程的研究方案,没有错过任何一次治疗。根据观察到的核对表记录的技术,两名针灸师完美地实施了13根针、10个疗程的针灸方案;没有针出现故障。六名参与者参加了所有疗程,完成了99%的测量项目。一名参与者不喜欢针灸(可接受性评分为60%),五名参与者喜欢针灸(可接受性评分为100%);平均可接受性评分为93.3%。

结论

研究的可行性得到了支持。该方案可用于针灸治疗外阴痛的双盲疗效试验。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02704234。于2015年11月30日注册。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验