Gupta Samriti, Sankar Jhuma, Lodha Rakesh, Kabra Sushil K
Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Front Pediatr. 2018 Apr 9;6:93. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00093. eCollection 2018.
Our objective was to compare the prevalence and outcomes of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome using the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC) criteria and Berlin definitions.
We screened case records of all children aged 1 month to 17 years of age admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) over a 3-year period (2015-2017) for presence of any respiratory difficulty at admission or during PICU stay. We applied both PALICC and Berlin criteria to these patients. Data collection included definition and outcome related variables. Data were compared between the "PALICC only group" and the "Berlin with or without PALICC" group using Stata 11.
Of a total of 615 admissions, 246 were identified as having respiratory difficulty at admission or during PICU stay. A total of 61 children (prevalence 9.9%; 95% CI: 7.8-12.4) fulfilled the definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with either of the two criteria. While 60 children (98%) fulfilled PALICC criteria, only 26 children (43%) fulfilled Berlin definition. There was moderate agreement between the two definitions (Kappa: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.40-0.62; observed agreement 85%). Greater proportion of patients had severe ARDS in the "Berlin with or without PALICC group" as compared to the "PALICC only" group (50 vs. 19%). There was no difference between the groups with regard to key clinical outcomes such as duration of ventilation (7 vs. 8 days) or mortality [51.4 vs. 57.7%: RR (95% CI): 0.99 (0.64-1.5)].
In comparison to Berlin definition, the PALICC criteria identified more number of patients with ARDS. Proportion with severe ARDS and complications was greater in the "Berlin with or without PALICC" group as compared to the "PALICC only" group. There were no differences in clinical outcomes between the groups.
我们的目的是使用儿科急性肺损伤共识会议(PALICC)标准和柏林定义比较小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征的患病率及转归。
我们筛查了在3年期间(2015 - 2017年)入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的所有1个月至17岁儿童的病例记录,以确定其入院时或在PICU住院期间是否存在任何呼吸困难。我们将PALICC和柏林标准都应用于这些患者。数据收集包括定义及与转归相关的变量。使用Stata 11对“仅PALICC组”和“柏林标准(含或不含PALICC)组”的数据进行比较。
在总共615例入院病例中,有246例被确定在入院时或在PICU住院期间存在呼吸困难。共有61名儿童(患病率9.9%;95%可信区间:7.8 - 12.4)符合两种标准中任何一种的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)定义。其中60名儿童(98%)符合PALICC标准,只有26名儿童(43%)符合柏林定义。两种定义之间存在中度一致性(Kappa值:0.51;95%可信区间:0.40 - 0.62;观察到的一致性为85%)。与“仅PALICC组”相比,“柏林标准(含或不含PALICC)组”中患有重度ARDS的患者比例更高(50%对19%)。两组在关键临床转归方面无差异,如通气时间(7天对8天)或死亡率[51.4%对57.7%:相对危险度(95%可信区间):0.99(0.64 - 1.5)]。
与柏林定义相比,PALICC标准识别出更多的ARDS患者。与“仅PALICC组”相比,“柏林标准(含或不含PALICC)组”中重度ARDS及并发症的比例更高。两组之间的临床转归无差异。