Beltramo Fernando, Khemani Robinder G
Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Oct;7(19):502. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.31.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been known to occur in children since early descriptions of the disease, but pediatric specific diagnostic criteria were first established in 2015 with the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC) definition of pediatric ARDS (PARDS). There were substantial changes proposed with the PALICC definition, including simplification of radiographic criteria, use of pulse oximetry based metrics to define PARDS, specific criteria for non-invasive ventilation, and the use of oxygenation index (OI) instead of PaO2/FiO2 ratio for those on invasive ventilation. While these changes could potentially result in major changes in the reported incidence and outcome of PARDS, review of the recent literature since publication of the PALICC definitions highlight that major elements regarding the contemporary epidemiology of PARDS have remained stable over the past 20 years. This highlights that the PARDS definition is likely catching up to changes in clinical practice, and suggests that this new definition should be used moving forward as it is more reflective of current practice than historical definitions. However, it is also clear that PARDS severity alone (as measured by the PALICC) criteria insufficiently characterizes the risk for mortality or other important clinical outcomes amongst PARDS patients, although there appears to be some association between PARDS severity and outcome, particularly when hypoxemia is severe.
自对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)进行早期描述以来,已知其可发生于儿童,但小儿特异性诊断标准于2015年随着小儿急性肺损伤共识会议(PALICC)对小儿ARDS(PARDS)的定义首次确立。PALICC定义提出了重大变化,包括简化影像学标准、使用基于脉搏血氧饱和度的指标来定义PARDS、无创通气的具体标准,以及对于接受有创通气的患者使用氧合指数(OI)而非PaO2/FiO2比值。虽然这些变化可能会导致PARDS报告的发病率和结局发生重大改变,但自PALICC定义发布以来对近期文献的回顾表明,在过去20年中,PARDS当代流行病学的主要要素一直保持稳定。这突出表明PARDS定义可能正在跟上临床实践的变化,并表明应采用这一新定义,因为它比历史定义更能反映当前实践。然而,同样明显的是,仅PARDS严重程度(如通过PALICC测量)标准不足以描述PARDS患者的死亡风险或其他重要临床结局,尽管PARDS严重程度与结局之间似乎存在一些关联,尤其是在低氧血症严重时。