• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放与腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局比较:一项韩国多中心协作研究。

The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;51(1):240-251. doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.417. Epub 2018 Apr 24.

DOI:10.4143/crt.2017.417
PMID:29690748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6333991/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared oncologic outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent open nephroureterectomy (ONU) or laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive cases of ONU and LNU between 2000 and 2012 at five participating institutions were included in this retrospective analysis. Clinical characteristics and pathologic outcomes were compared between the two surgical approaches. The influence of the type of surgical approach on intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were assessed with the log-rank test. Predictors of IVRFS, PFS, CSS, and OS were also analyzed with a multivariable Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 1,521 patients with UTUC were eligible for the present study (ONU, 906; LNU, 615). The estimated 5-year IVRFS (57.8 vs. 51.0%, p=0.010), CSS (80.4 vs. 76.4%, p=0.032), and OS (75.8 vs. 71.4%, p=0.026) rates were significantly different between the two groups in favor of LNU. Moreover, in patients with locally advanced disease (pT3/pT4), the LNU group showed better 5-year IVRFS (62.9 vs. 54.1%, p=0.038), CSS (64.3 vs. 56.9%, p=0.022), and OS (60.4 vs. 53.1%, p=0.018) rates than the ONU group. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that type of surgical approach was independently associated with IVRFS, but was not related to PFS, CSS, and OS.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that LNU provided better oncologic control of IVRFS, CSS, and OS compared with ONU for the management of patients with UTUC.

摘要

目的

我们比较了接受开放式肾盂输尿管切除术(ONU)或腹腔镜肾盂输尿管切除术(LNU)的上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者的肿瘤学结果。

材料和方法

本回顾性分析纳入了 2000 年至 2012 年在五家参与机构接受 ONU 和 LNU 的连续病例。比较了两种手术方法的临床特征和病理结果。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法分析手术方式对膀胱内无复发生存率(IVRFS)、无进展生存率(PFS)、癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)的影响,采用对数秩检验评估差异。采用多变量 Cox 回归模型分析 IVRFS、PFS、CSS 和 OS 的预测因素。

结果

共有 1521 例 UTUC 患者符合本研究条件(ONU,906 例;LNU,615 例)。两组 5 年 IVRFS(57.8%比 51.0%,p=0.010)、CSS(80.4%比 76.4%,p=0.032)和 OS(75.8%比 71.4%,p=0.026)率差异有统计学意义,LNU 组更优。此外,在局部进展性疾病(pT3/pT4)患者中,LNU 组 5 年 IVRFS(62.9%比 54.1%,p=0.038)、CSS(64.3%比 56.9%,p=0.022)和 OS(60.4%比 53.1%,p=0.018)率均优于 ONU 组。多变量 Cox 回归分析表明,手术方式与 IVRFS 独立相关,但与 PFS、CSS 和 OS 无关。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,与 ONU 相比,LNU 可更好地控制 IVRFS、CSS 和 OS,从而为 UTUC 患者的治疗提供了更好的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a826/6333991/7e0f8bbfae81/crt-2017-417f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a826/6333991/09ee9d060fd9/crt-2017-417f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a826/6333991/dbb72f13c36f/crt-2017-417f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a826/6333991/7e0f8bbfae81/crt-2017-417f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a826/6333991/09ee9d060fd9/crt-2017-417f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a826/6333991/dbb72f13c36f/crt-2017-417f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a826/6333991/7e0f8bbfae81/crt-2017-417f3.jpg

相似文献

1
The Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Korean Multicenter Collaborative Study.开放与腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结局比较:一项韩国多中心协作研究。
Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;51(1):240-251. doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.417. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
2
Laparoscopy versus Open Nephroureterectomy in Prognostic Outcome of Patients with Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.腹腔镜与开放性肾输尿管切除术治疗晚期上尿路尿路上皮癌患者预后的比较:一项回顾性、多中心、倾向评分匹配分析。
Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jul;51(3):963-972. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.465. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
3
Laparoscopic Versus Open Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity-Score Matched Studies.腹腔镜与开放肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:倾向评分匹配研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Innov. 2024 Oct;31(5):520-529. doi: 10.1177/15533506241273378. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
4
Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy to treat localized and/or locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: oncological outcomes from a multicenter study.腹腔镜与开放肾输尿管切除术治疗局限性和/或局部进展性上尿路尿路上皮癌:一项多中心研究的肿瘤学结果
BMC Surg. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0202-x.
5
Oncologic outcomes for open and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.开放和腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结果。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug;23(4):726-733. doi: 10.1007/s10147-018-1248-9. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
6
Comparison of Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.开放性与腹腔镜及手辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jun;28(6):656-681. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0662. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
7
Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Nephroureterectomy for Patients with T3N0M0 Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study with Adjustment by Propensity Score Matching.腹腔镜与开放性根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗 T3N0M0 上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的长期肿瘤学结果:多中心队列研究,并通过倾向评分匹配进行调整。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(11):3774-3781. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07623-1. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
8
Long-term comparative outcomes of open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial-cell carcinoma after a median follow-up of 13 years*.**中位随访 13 年后比较开放与腹腔镜肾盂输尿管癌根治术治疗上尿路上皮细胞癌的长期疗效**。 *
J Endourol. 2011 Aug;25(8):1329-35. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0223. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
9
Surgical and oncological outcome after laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for non-metastatic, upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. A single-centre experience.腹腔镜与开放肾输尿管切除术治疗非转移性上尿路尿路上皮癌的手术及肿瘤学结局:单中心经验
Saudi Med J. 2020 Jan;41(1):25-33. doi: 10.15537/smj.2020.1.24780.
10
Transperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse disease progression than retroperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.经腹腔根治性肾输尿管切除术与经后腹腔根治性肾输尿管切除术相比,在上尿路尿路上皮癌患者中与更差的疾病进展相关。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 18;9(1):6294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42739-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic effects of different nephroureterectomy techniques for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.不同肾输尿管切除术技术对上尿路尿路上皮癌的预后影响:一项网状Meta分析
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13773-1.
2
Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Trend Analysis of Utilization and a Comparative Study.机器人辅助根治性肾输尿管切除术联合膀胱袖状切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:应用趋势分析及对比研究
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 19;14(10):2497. doi: 10.3390/cancers14102497.
3
A HALP score-based prediction model for survival of patients with the upper tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing radical nephroureterectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Utilization and Outcomes of Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma by Surgical Approach.经手术入路行上尿路尿路上皮癌肾输尿管切除术的应用及结果
J Endourol. 2017 Jul;31(7):661-665. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0086. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
2
Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2014.韩国癌症统计数据:2014年的发病率、死亡率、生存率及患病率
Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Apr;49(2):292-305. doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.118. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
3
Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy to treat localized and/or locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: oncological outcomes from a multicenter study.
基于 HALP 评分的上尿路上皮癌行根治性肾输尿管切除术患者生存预测模型。
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2022 Apr 1;22(2):280-290. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2021.6543.
4
A retrospective multicenter comparison of conditional cancer-specific survival between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma.回顾性多中心研究比较腹腔镜与开放性根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗局部晚期上尿路上皮癌的条件性癌症特异性生存。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0255965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255965. eCollection 2021.
5
Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.开放性肾输尿管切除术与腹腔镜手术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的比较:一项Meta分析
Front Surg. 2021 Aug 13;8:729686. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.729686. eCollection 2021.
6
Impact of pathological factors on survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.影响上尿路尿路上皮癌患者生存的病理因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 May-Jun;48(3):406-455. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1032.
7
Surgical and oncological outcome after laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for non-metastatic, upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. A single-centre experience.腹腔镜与开放肾输尿管切除术治疗非转移性上尿路尿路上皮癌的手术及肿瘤学结局:单中心经验
Saudi Med J. 2020 Jan;41(1):25-33. doi: 10.15537/smj.2020.1.24780.
8
Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌后淋巴血管侵犯的预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Markers. 2019 Sep 3;2019:7386140. doi: 10.1155/2019/7386140. eCollection 2019.
9
Transperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse disease progression than retroperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.经腹腔根治性肾输尿管切除术与经后腹腔根治性肾输尿管切除术相比,在上尿路尿路上皮癌患者中与更差的疾病进展相关。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 18;9(1):6294. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42739-0.
腹腔镜与开放肾输尿管切除术治疗局限性和/或局部进展性上尿路尿路上皮癌:一项多中心研究的肿瘤学结果
BMC Surg. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0202-x.
4
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
5
Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术与开放性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的长期肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PeerJ. 2016 May 31;4:e2063. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2063. eCollection 2016.
6
Diagnostic Ureterorenoscopy Is Associated with Increased Intravesical Recurrence following Radical Nephroureterectomy in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.诊断性输尿管肾镜检查与上尿路尿路上皮癌根治性肾输尿管切除术后膀胱内复发增加有关。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 10;10(11):e0139976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139976. eCollection 2015.
7
Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse survival outcomes than open radical nephroureterectomy in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma.对于局部晚期上尿路尿路上皮癌患者,腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术与开放性根治性肾输尿管切除术相比,生存结局更差。
World J Urol. 2016 Jun;34(6):859-69. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1712-3. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
8
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma: 2015 Update.欧洲泌尿外科学会上尿路上皮细胞癌指南:2015 年更新版。
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):868-79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.044. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
9
Diabetes mellitus without metformin intake is associated with worse oncologic outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.未服用二甲双胍的糖尿病与上尿路上皮癌根治性肾输尿管切除术(radical nephroureterectomy)后的肿瘤不良结局相关。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;40(1):113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
10
Comparison of oncological outcomes for open and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy: results from the Canadian Upper Tract Collaboration.开放和腹腔镜根治性肾输尿管切除术的肿瘤学结果比较:来自加拿大上尿路协作组的结果。
BJU Int. 2013 Oct;112(6):791-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11474.x. Epub 2012 Nov 13.