J Policy Anal Manage. 2018;37(2):265-300. doi: 10.1002/pam.22043.
More than 20 percent of all school-aged children in the United States have vision problems, and low-income and minority children are disproportionately likely to have unmet vision care needs. Vision screening is common in U.S. schools, but it remains an open question whether screening alone is sufficient to improve student outcomes. We implemented a multi-armed randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the impact of vision screening, and of vision screening accompanied by eye exams and eyeglasses, provided by a non-profit organization to Title I elementary schools in three large central Florida school districts. We find that providing additional/enhanced screening alone is generally insufficient to improve student achievement in math and reading. In contrast, providing screening along with free eye exams and free eyeglasses to students with vision problems improved student achievement as measured by standardized test scores. We find, averaging over all students (including those without vision problems), that this more comprehensive intervention increased the probability of passing the Florida Comprehensive Achievement Tests (FCATs) in reading and math by approximately 2.0 percentage points. We also present evidence that indicates that this impact fades out over time, indicating that follow-up actions after the intervention may be necessary to sustain these estimated achievement gains.
美国超过 20%的学龄儿童存在视力问题,而低收入和少数族裔儿童的视力保健需求得不到满足的可能性不成比例地高。美国学校普遍进行视力筛查,但单独进行筛查是否足以改善学生的学习成果仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。我们实施了一项多臂随机对照试验 (RCT),以评估非营利组织向佛罗里达州三个大型中心学区的头等小学提供的视力筛查以及伴有眼科检查和眼镜的视力筛查对学生的影响。我们发现,仅提供额外/增强型筛查通常不足以提高学生在数学和阅读方面的成绩。相比之下,为有视力问题的学生提供筛查以及免费的眼科检查和眼镜,可通过标准化考试成绩提高学生的学习成绩。我们发现,平均而言(包括那些没有视力问题的学生),这种更全面的干预措施使通过佛罗里达州综合成就测试(FCAT)在阅读和数学方面的可能性提高了大约 2.0 个百分点。我们还提供了证据表明,这种影响会随着时间的推移而逐渐消失,这表明干预措施后可能需要采取后续行动来维持这些估计的学习成果。