• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分层韧性评估方法。

Tiered Approach to Resilience Assessment.

机构信息

United States Army Corp of Engineers, USA.

U.S. Geological Survey, Nebraska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2018 Sep;38(9):1772-1780. doi: 10.1111/risa.12991. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1111/risa.12991
PMID:29694670
Abstract

Regulatory agencies have long adopted a three-tier framework for risk assessment. We build on this structure to propose a tiered approach for resilience assessment that can be integrated into the existing regulatory processes. Comprehensive approaches to assessing resilience at appropriate and operational scales, reconciling analytical complexity as needed with stakeholder needs and resources available, and ultimately creating actionable recommendations to enhance resilience are still lacking. Our proposed framework consists of tiers by which analysts can select resilience assessment and decision support tools to inform associated management actions relative to the scope and urgency of the risk and the capacity of resource managers to improve system resilience. The resilience management framework proposed is not intended to supplant either risk management or the many existing efforts of resilience quantification method development, but instead provide a guide to selecting tools that are appropriate for the given analytic need. The goal of this tiered approach is to intentionally parallel the tiered approach used in regulatory contexts so that resilience assessment might be more easily and quickly integrated into existing structures and with existing policies.

摘要

监管机构长期以来一直采用三层框架进行风险评估。我们在此基础上提出了一种分层方法来评估弹性,该方法可以整合到现有的监管流程中。在适当的和可操作的规模上综合评估弹性,根据需要协调分析的复杂性以及利益相关者的需求和可用资源,并最终提出增强弹性的可行建议,这些方面仍有所欠缺。我们提出的框架由各个层次组成,分析师可以根据这些层次选择弹性评估和决策支持工具,以便根据风险的范围和紧迫性以及资源管理者提高系统弹性的能力来为相关管理行动提供信息。所提出的弹性管理框架并非旨在取代风险管理或许多现有的弹性量化方法开发工作,而是提供一个选择适当工具的指南,以满足特定的分析需求。这种分层方法的目的是有意与监管环境中使用的分层方法保持一致,以便更轻松、更快速地将弹性评估纳入现有的结构和政策中。

相似文献

1
Tiered Approach to Resilience Assessment.分层韧性评估方法。
Risk Anal. 2018 Sep;38(9):1772-1780. doi: 10.1111/risa.12991. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
2
Development of hospital disaster resilience: conceptual framework and potential measurement.医院灾难恢复力的发展:概念框架与潜在测量方法
Emerg Med J. 2014 Nov;31(11):930-8. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202282. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
3
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
4
Building community resilience: business preparedness lessons in the case of Adapazarı, Turkey.建立社区复原力:土耳其阿达帕扎勒案例中的企业准备经验教训。
Disasters. 2016 Jan;40(1):45-64. doi: 10.1111/disa.12132. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
5
Building Community Capacity and Fostering Disaster Resilience.建设社区能力并增强灾害抵御能力。
J Clin Psychol. 2016 Dec;72(12):1318-1332. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22281. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
6
Community disaster resilience: a systematic review on assessment models and tools.社区灾害恢复力:评估模型与工具的系统综述
PLoS Curr. 2015 Apr 8;7:ecurrents.dis.f224ef8efbdfcf1d508dd0de4d8210ed. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.f224ef8efbdfcf1d508dd0de4d8210ed.
7
A tiered model of substance use severity and life complexity: Potential for application to needs-based planning.物质使用严重程度与生活复杂性的分层模型:应用于基于需求的规划的潜力。
Subst Abus. 2016 Oct-Dec;37(4):526-533. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2016.1143907. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
8
Resilience Assessment of Complex Urban Public Spaces.复杂城市公共空间的韧性评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 14;17(2):524. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020524.
9
A New Framework for Addressing Adverse Childhood and Community Experiences: The Building Community Resilience Model.应对不良儿童和社区经历的新框架:建设社区恢复力模型。
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7S):S86-S93. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.011.
10
Emergency Response and Management应急响应与管理

引用本文的文献

1
Linking coastal environmental and health observations for human wellbeing.将沿海环境和健康观测联系起来,以增进人类福祉。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 14;11:1202118. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1202118. eCollection 2023.
2
Cascading failures and resilience optimization of hospital infrastructure systems against the COVID-19.医院基础设施系统针对新冠疫情的连锁故障与恢复力优化
Comput Ind Eng. 2023 May;179:109158. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2023.109158. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
3
An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
一种用于可持续和有弹性的供应商选择的扩展混合模糊多准则决策模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(25):37291-37314. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17851-2. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
4
Prioritization of Resilience Initiatives for Climate-Related Disasters in the Metropolitan City of Venice.优先考虑威尼斯大都市应对气候相关灾害的复原力计划。
Risk Anal. 2022 May;42(5):931-952. doi: 10.1111/risa.13823. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
5
How to tackle complexity in urban climate resilience? Negotiating climate science, adaptation and multi-level governance in India.如何应对城市气候韧性中的复杂性?在印度协商气候科学、适应和多层次治理。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 1;16(7):e0253904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253904. eCollection 2021.
6
Reviewing qualitative research approaches in the context of critical infrastructure resilience.在关键基础设施恢复力的背景下审视定性研究方法。
Environ Syst Decis. 2021;41(3):341-376. doi: 10.1007/s10669-020-09795-8. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
7
An IoE and Big Multimedia Data Approach for Urban Transport System Resilience Management in Smart Cities.基于物联网和大数据的多媒体方法在智慧城市中实现城市交通系统韧性管理
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 9;21(2):435. doi: 10.3390/s21020435.
8
Globalization and global risk: How risk analysis needs to be enhanced to be effective in confronting current threats.全球化与全球风险:如何加强风险分析以有效应对当前威胁。
Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2021 Jan;205:107270. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107270. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
9
Measuring the resilience of criminogenic ecosystems to global disruption: A case-study of COVID-19 in China.测量犯罪生态系统对全球破坏的恢复力:以中国的 COVID-19 为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0240077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240077. eCollection 2020.
10
Advancements to the Multi-System Model of Resilience: updates from empirical evidence.复原力多系统模型的进展:来自实证证据的更新
Heliyon. 2020 Sep 14;6(9):e04831. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04831. eCollection 2020 Sep.