• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤治疗电场作为胶质母细胞瘤的第四种治疗方式:一项荟萃分析。

Tumor-treating fields as a fourth treating modality for glioblastoma: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Magouliotis Dimitrios E, Asprodini Eftihia K, Svokos Konstantina A, Tasiopoulou Vasiliki S, Svokos Alexis A, Toms Steven A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.

Laboratory of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Jun;160(6):1167-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3536-6. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00701-018-3536-6
PMID:29696502
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aim to review the available literature on patients suffering from glioblastoma treated with tumor-treating fields (TTFields) plus radio chemotherapy or conventional radio chemotherapy alone, to compare the efficacy and safety of the two methods.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane library, and Scopus databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Six studies met the inclusion criteria incorporating 1806 patients for the qualitative analysis and 1769 for the quantitative analysis.

RESULTS

This study reveals increased median overall survival (weighted mean difference (WMD) 3.29 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.37, 4.21]; p < 0.00001), survival at 1 year (odds ratio (OR) 1.81 [95% CI 1.41, 2.32]; p < 0.00001) and 2 years (OR 2.33 [95% CI 1.73, 3.14]; p < 0.00001), and median progression-free survival (WMD 2.35 [95% CI 1.76, 2.93]; p < 0.00001) along with progression-free survival at 6 months (WMD 6.86 [95% CI 5.91, 7.81]; p < 0.00001) for the patients treated with TTFields. Survival at 3 years was comparable between the two groups. TTFields were associated with fewer adverse events compared to chemotherapy along with similar incidence of skin irritation.

CONCLUSIONS

TTFields are a safe and efficient novel treatment modality. More randomized controlled studies, with longer follow-up, are necessary to further assess the clinical outcomes of TTFields.

摘要

背景

我们旨在回顾关于胶质母细胞瘤患者接受肿瘤治疗电场(TTFields)联合放化疗或单纯传统放化疗的现有文献,以比较两种方法的疗效和安全性。

方法

根据PRISMA指南,在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Scopus数据库中进行系统的文献检索。六项研究符合纳入标准,纳入1806例患者进行定性分析,1769例进行定量分析。

结果

本研究显示,接受TTFields治疗的患者中位总生存期延长(加权平均差(WMD)3.29 [95%置信区间(CI)2.37, 4.21];p < 0.00001),1年生存率(优势比(OR)1.81 [95% CI 1.41, 2.32];p < 0.00001)和2年生存率(OR 2.33 [95% CI 1.73, 3.14];p < 0.00001),以及中位无进展生存期(WMD 2.35 [95% CI 1.76, 2.93];p < 0.00001)和6个月无进展生存期(WMD 6.86 [95% CI 5.91, 7.81];p < 0.00001)。两组3年生存率相当。与化疗相比,TTFields相关的不良事件更少,皮肤刺激发生率相似。

结论

TTFields是一种安全有效的新型治疗方式。需要更多随访时间更长的随机对照研究来进一步评估TTFields的临床疗效。

相似文献

1
Tumor-treating fields as a fourth treating modality for glioblastoma: a meta-analysis.肿瘤治疗电场作为胶质母细胞瘤的第四种治疗方式:一项荟萃分析。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Jun;160(6):1167-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3536-6. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
2
Maintenance Therapy With Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Temozolomide vs Temozolomide Alone for Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.替莫唑胺联合肿瘤电场治疗与替莫唑胺单药治疗胶质母细胞瘤的维持治疗:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Dec 15;314(23):2535-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16669.
3
Tumor treating fields plus temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a sub-group analysis of Korean patients in the EF-14 phase 3 trial.替莫唑胺联合肿瘤电场治疗用于新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤:EF-14 期 3 临床试验中韩国患者的亚组分析。
J Neurooncol. 2020 Feb;146(3):399-406. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03361-2. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
4
Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Maintenance Temozolomide vs Maintenance Temozolomide Alone on Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.肿瘤治疗电场联合维持性替莫唑胺与单纯维持性替莫唑胺对胶质母细胞瘤患者生存的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2306-2316. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18718.
5
What is the Role of Tumor-treating Fields in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma?肿瘤治疗电场在新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤中起什么作用?
Neurologist. 2019 Mar;24(2):71-73. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000222.
6
The Evolving Role of Tumor Treating Fields in Managing Glioblastoma: Guide for Oncologists.肿瘤治疗电场在胶质母细胞瘤管理中的演变作用:肿瘤学家指南
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;41(2):191-196. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000395.
7
Tumor treating fields for newly diagnosed high-grade glioma based on the criteria of 2021 WHO CNS5: A retrospective analysis of Chinese patients in a single center.基于 2021 年 WHO CNS5 标准的新诊断高级别脑胶质瘤的肿瘤治疗电场:单一中心中国患者的回顾性分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jun;13(11):e7350. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7350.
8
Tumor-treating fields plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for glioblastoma at first recurrence: a post hoc analysis of the EF-14 trial.肿瘤治疗电场联合化疗与单纯化疗用于胶质母细胞瘤首次复发的治疗:EF-14试验的事后分析
CNS Oncol. 2017 Jul;6(3):185-193. doi: 10.2217/cns-2016-0049. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
9
Tumour Treating Fields (TTFields) in combination with lomustine and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.替莫唑胺联合肿瘤电场治疗用于初诊胶质母细胞瘤患者。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar;146(3):787-792. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03106-8. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
10
Influence of Treatment With Tumor-Treating Fields on Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.电场治疗对新诊断胶质母细胞瘤患者健康相关生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;4(4):495-504. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5082.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements and current trends in tumor treating fields: a scientometric analysis.肿瘤治疗电场的进展和当前趋势:科学计量分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2978-2991. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001151.
2
Association of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy with survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肿瘤治疗电场(TTFields)治疗与新诊断胶质母细胞瘤患者生存的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurooncol. 2023 Aug;164(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04348-w. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
3
Tumor-Treating Fields for the treatment of glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Maintenance Temozolomide vs Maintenance Temozolomide Alone on Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.肿瘤治疗电场联合维持性替莫唑胺与单纯维持性替莫唑胺对胶质母细胞瘤患者生存的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2306-2316. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18718.
2
Survival benefit of glioblastoma patients after FDA approval of temozolomide concomitant with radiation and bevacizumab: A population-based study.美国食品药品监督管理局批准替莫唑胺联合放疗和贝伐单抗后胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存获益:一项基于人群的研究。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 4;8(27):44015-44031. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17054.
3
用于治疗胶质母细胞瘤的肿瘤治疗电场:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurooncol Pract. 2021 Apr 20;8(4):426-440. doi: 10.1093/nop/npab026. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
A contemporary update on glioblastoma: molecular biology, current management, and a vision towards bio-adaptable personalized care.胶质母细胞瘤的现代研究进展:分子生物学、当前的治疗方法以及生物适应性个体化治疗的展望。
J Neurooncol. 2021 Jan;151(2):103-112. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03671-w. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
OptimalTTF-1: Enhancing tumor treating fields therapy with skull remodeling surgery. A clinical phase I trial in adult recurrent glioblastoma.优化的甲状腺转录因子-1:通过颅骨重塑手术增强肿瘤治疗电场疗法。一项针对成人复发性胶质母细胞瘤的I期临床试验。
Neurooncol Adv. 2020 Sep 15;2(1):vdaa121. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa121. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
6
The Value of Tumor Treating Fields in Glioblastoma.肿瘤治疗电场在胶质母细胞瘤中的价值
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020 Nov;63(6):681-688. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2019.0224. Epub 2020 May 8.
7
Recent Advances in Oncolytic Virotherapy and Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma: A Glimmer of Hope in the Search for an Effective Therapy?胶质母细胞瘤溶瘤病毒疗法和免疫疗法的最新进展:寻找有效治疗方法中的一线希望?
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Dec 5;10(12):492. doi: 10.3390/cancers10120492.
CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012.
CBTRUS统计报告:2008 - 2012年美国原发性脑和中枢神经系统肿瘤诊断情况
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv1-iv62. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov189. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
4
Clinical benefit in recurrent glioblastoma from adjuvant NovoTTF-100A and TCCC after temozolomide and bevacizumab failure: a preliminary observation.替莫唑胺和贝伐单抗治疗失败后,辅助使用NovoTTF-100A和肿瘤治疗电场疗法(TCCC)对复发性胶质母细胞瘤的临床益处:一项初步观察。
Cancer Med. 2015 Mar;4(3):383-91. doi: 10.1002/cam4.421. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
5
Post Hoc analyses of intention-to-treat population in phase III comparison of NovoTTF-100A™ system versus best physician's choice chemotherapy.在NovoTTF-100A™系统与最佳医生选择化疗的III期比较中对意向性治疗人群进行的事后分析。
Semin Oncol. 2014 Oct;41 Suppl 6:S25-34. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
6
Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.贝伐珠单抗联合放疗-替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):709-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308345.
7
A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.贝伐珠单抗治疗新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 20;370(8):699-708. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308573.
8
Extent of resection of glioblastoma revisited: personalized survival modeling facilitates more accurate survival prediction and supports a maximum-safe-resection approach to surgery.重新探讨胶质母细胞瘤的切除术范围:个性化生存建模有助于更准确的生存预测,并支持以最大安全切除为手术方法。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 10;32(8):774-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.8886. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
9
NovoTTF-100A versus physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality.NovoTTF-100A 与医师选择化疗治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的比较:一种新型治疗方式的随机 III 期试验。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Sep;48(14):2192-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 May 18.
10
Correlation of IDH1 mutation with clinicopathologic factors and prognosis in primary glioblastoma: a report of 118 patients from China.中国 118 例患者原发性胶质母细胞瘤中 IDH1 突变与临床病理因素及预后的相关性研究
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030339. Epub 2012 Jan 23.