• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用不同的期望机制优化医疗条件患者的治疗:系统评价。

Using Different Expectation Mechanisms to Optimize Treatment of Patients With Medical Conditions: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

From the Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy (Kube, Glombiewski, Rief), Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Psychosom Med. 2018 Jul/Aug;80(6):535-543. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000596.

DOI:10.1097/PSY.0000000000000596
PMID:29697530
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients' expectations have been shown to predict the course and treatment success of a variety of medical conditions. Therefore, expectation-focused psychological interventions (EFPIs) have been developed to use these expectation effects clinically. Importantly, EFPI differ with regard to the particular expectation mechanism being addressed, i.e., expectation optimization or expectation violation. The aims of this systematic review were to give an overview of the application of these expectation interventions and to evaluate their effectiveness.

METHODS

Several databases were searched to identify clinical trials or experimental studies that conducted EFPI among participants with various medical conditions. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (N = 944) investigating different medical conditions (coronary heart disease, cancer, chronic pain) were included. Qualitative synthesis revealed positive effects of EFPI on clinical outcome variables in all studies. Expectation optimization approaches yielded particularly promising results. Because of the large heterogeneity of outcome measures, quantitative synthesis was not possible.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the potential of EFPI for optimizing treatment of patients with medical conditions. However, it seems that different expectation mechanisms might have different application possibilities. Therefore, we provide suggestions for further developing EFPI to tailor treatment and develop personalized psychological interventions. We argue that for this purpose, it is important to consider both disease-specific aspects and patients' personality traits. In addition, we discuss future challenges such as implementing EFPI into routine medical care.

摘要

目的

研究表明,患者的期望可以预测多种医疗状况的病程和治疗效果。因此,已经开发了以期望为重点的心理干预措施(EFPI),以便在临床上利用这些期望效应。重要的是,EFPI 在针对的特定期望机制方面存在差异,即期望优化或期望违背。本系统评价的目的是概述这些期望干预措施的应用,并评估其效果。

方法

通过搜索多个数据库,确定了针对各种医疗状况的参与者进行 EFPI 的临床试验或实验研究。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。

结果

纳入了 11 项研究(N=944),涉及不同的医疗状况(冠心病、癌症、慢性疼痛)。定性综合分析显示,所有研究中 EFPI 对临床结局变量均有积极影响。期望优化方法尤其取得了有希望的结果。由于结果测量指标的高度异质性,因此无法进行定量综合。

结论

本综述强调了 EFPI 优化治疗患有医疗状况的患者的潜力。然而,不同的期望机制似乎具有不同的应用可能性。因此,我们为进一步开发 EFPI 以调整治疗和开发个性化心理干预措施提供了建议。我们认为,为此目的,考虑疾病特异性方面和患者的个性特征很重要。此外,我们还讨论了实施 EFPI 纳入常规医疗护理等未来挑战。

相似文献

1
Using Different Expectation Mechanisms to Optimize Treatment of Patients With Medical Conditions: A Systematic Review.利用不同的期望机制优化医疗条件患者的治疗:系统评价。
Psychosom Med. 2018 Jul/Aug;80(6):535-543. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000596.
2
Expectation-Focused Psychotherapy to Improve Clinical Outcomes.以期望为中心的心理治疗改善临床结局。
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;138:257-270. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
3
Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.医疗服务量与健康结果:来自系统评价及意大利医院数据评估的证据
Epidemiol Prev. 2017 Sep-Dec;41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. doi: 10.19191/EP17.5-6S2.P001.100.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Patient expectations for management of chronic non-cancer pain: A systematic review.患者对慢性非癌性疼痛管理的期望:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1201-1217. doi: 10.1111/hex.12527. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
6
Exploring effect of pain education on chronic pain patients' expectation of recovery and pain intensity.探索疼痛教育对慢性疼痛患者康复期望及疼痛强度的影响。
Scand J Pain. 2018 Apr 25;18(2):211-219. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0023.
7
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews].[容量与健康结局:系统评价概述]
Epidemiol Prev. 2005 May-Aug;29(3-4 Suppl):3-63.
10
Effectiveness of Mindfulness- and Relaxation-Based eHealth Interventions for Patients with Medical Conditions: a Systematic Review and Synthesis.基于正念和放松的电子健康干预措施对患有疾病患者的有效性:一项系统评价与综合分析
Int J Behav Med. 2018 Feb;25(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s12529-017-9679-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Design of a Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial: Strengthening Positive Treatment Expectations Using a Communication Model for Maximized Antiemetic Effects of Acupuncture and Antiemetics During Emetogenic Neo-/Adjuvant Chemotherapy.一项随机假对照试验的设计:使用一种沟通模型强化积极的治疗期望,以在致吐性新辅助/辅助化疗期间最大化针灸和止吐药的止吐效果。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15347354251361464. doi: 10.1177/15347354251361464. Epub 2025 Aug 22.
2
Prior therapeutic experiences and treatment expectations are differentially associated with pain-related disability in individuals with chronic pain.既往治疗经历和治疗期望与慢性疼痛患者的疼痛相关残疾存在不同程度的关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 26;15(1):14687. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98614-8.
3
Factors influencing the hypoalgesic effects of virtual reality.影响虚拟现实镇痛效果的因素。
Pain. 2025 Mar 4;166(8):1836-1846. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003549.
4
Development of an expectation management intervention for patients with Long COVID: A focus group study with affected patients.针对长新冠患者的期望管理干预措施的开发:一项针对受影响患者的焦点小组研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 3;20(2):e0317905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317905. eCollection 2025.
5
Reframing pain: the power of individual and societal factors to enhance pain treatment.重新审视疼痛:个人因素与社会因素对强化疼痛治疗的作用
Pain Rep. 2024 Apr 19;9(3):e1161. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001161. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Patient-centered evaluation of an expectation-focused intervention for patients undergoing heart valve surgery: a qualitative study.以患者为中心对心脏瓣膜手术患者进行的以期望为重点的干预措施的评估:一项定性研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 15;11:1338964. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1338964. eCollection 2024.
7
Development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized patients' expectations for treatment scalepatient version.住院患者治疗期望量表患者版的编制与心理测量学验证
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 12;14:1201707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1201707. eCollection 2023.
8
The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q): Validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients' treatment expectations.治疗期望问卷(TEX-Q):一种通用多维量表测量患者治疗期望的验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 23;18(1):e0280472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280472. eCollection 2023.
9
Illness Beliefs, Treatment Beliefs, and Fulfilled Treatment Expectations in Psychosomatic Rehabilitation: Associations with Patient Satisfaction.心身康复中的疾病认知、治疗认知与治疗期望的达成:与患者满意度的关联
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Dec 15;16:3303-3317. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S390596. eCollection 2022.
10
Risk factors for worsening of somatic symptom burden in a prospective cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间一项前瞻性队列研究中躯体症状负担加重的危险因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:1022203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1022203. eCollection 2022.