Suppr超能文献

主要面向本科生的院校中影响化学和物理专业学生科研成果数量和类型的因素:一项案例研究。

Factors affecting the number and type of student research products for chemistry and physics students at primarily undergraduate institutions: A case study.

机构信息

Department of Chemistry and Physics, University of St Thomas, Houston, Texas, United States of America.

Department of Physics, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 26;13(4):e0196338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196338. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

For undergraduate students, involvement in authentic research represents scholarship that is consistent with disciplinary quality standards and provides an integrative learning experience. In conjunction with performing research, the communication of the results via presentations or publications is a measure of the level of scientific engagement. The empirical study presented here uses generalized linear mixed models with hierarchical bootstrapping to examine the factors that impact the means of dissemination of undergraduate research results. Focusing on the research experiences in physics and chemistry of undergraduates at four Primarily Undergraduate Institutions (PUIs) from 2004-2013, statistical analysis indicates that the gender of the student does not impact the number and type of research products. However, in chemistry, the rank of the faculty advisor and the venue of the presentation do impact the number of research products by undergraduate student, whereas in physics, gender match between student and advisor has an effect on the number of undergraduate research products. This study provides a baseline for future studies of discipline-based bibliometrics and factors that affect the number of research products of undergraduate students.

摘要

对于本科生而言,参与真实的研究代表着符合学科质量标准的学术成就,并且提供了一种综合性的学习体验。与进行研究相结合,通过演示或出版物来交流研究成果是衡量科学参与程度的一种手段。本研究使用具有层次引导的广义线性混合模型来检验影响本科生研究成果传播方式的因素。本研究重点关注 2004 年至 2013 年四年间四所基础类研究型大学(PUIs)中本科生在物理和化学领域的研究经历,统计分析表明,学生的性别并不影响研究成果的数量和类型。然而,在化学领域,导师的排名和演示的地点确实会影响本科生的研究成果数量,而在物理领域,学生和导师之间的性别匹配会对本科生的研究成果数量产生影响。本研究为未来基于学科的文献计量学以及影响本科生研究成果数量的因素的研究提供了一个基准。

相似文献

5
Embedding Research in Undergraduate Learning Opportunities.
West J Nurs Res. 2015 Oct;37(10):1340-58. doi: 10.1177/0193945915571136. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
6
Research-based implementation of peer instruction: a literature review.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Mar 2;14(1):es3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-11-0198.
10
Contemporary Test Validity in Theory and Practice: A Primer for Discipline-Based Education Researchers.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Spring;15(1):rm1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-08-0183.

引用本文的文献

1
High impact: Examining predictors of faculty-undergraduate coauthored publication and presentation in psychology.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 31;17(3):e0265074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265074. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender and the Publication Output of Graduate Students: A Case Study.
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 13;11(1):e0145146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145146. eCollection 2016.
3
Scientific community. No sexism in science? Not so fast, critics say.
Science. 2014 Nov 14;346(6211):798. doi: 10.1126/science.346.6211.798.
4
Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 15;111(28):10107-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1403334111. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
5
The role of gender in scholarly authorship.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e66212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066212. Print 2013.
7
The "gender gap" in authorship of academic medical literature--a 35-year perspective.
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 20;355(3):281-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa053910.
8
Diversity. Preparing minority scientists and engineers.
Science. 2006 Mar 31;311(5769):1870-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1125257.
9
Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): first findings.
Cell Biol Educ. 2004 Winter;3(4):270-7. doi: 10.1187/cbe.04-07-0045.
10
Fixing the leaky pipeline: women scientists in academia.
J Anim Sci. 1996 Nov;74(11):2843-8. doi: 10.2527/1996.74112843x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验