*Educational Technology, Research and Assessment, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115
College of Computer, Mathematical and Natural Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Spring;15(1):rm1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-08-0183.
Most discipline-based education researchers (DBERs) were formally trained in the methods of scientific disciplines such as biology, chemistry, and physics, rather than social science disciplines such as psychology and education. As a result, DBERs may have never taken specific courses in the social science research methodology--either quantitative or qualitative--on which their scholarship often relies so heavily. One particular aspect of (quantitative) social science research that differs markedly from disciplines such as biology and chemistry is the instrumentation used to quantify phenomena. In response, this Research Methods essay offers a contemporary social science perspective on test validity and the validation process. The instructional piece explores the concepts of test validity, the validation process, validity evidence, and key threats to validity. The essay also includes an in-depth example of a validity argument and validation approach for a test of student argument analysis. In addition to DBERs, this essay should benefit practitioners (e.g., lab directors, faculty members) in the development, evaluation, and/or selection of instruments for their work assessing students or evaluating pedagogical innovations.
大多数基于学科的教育研究人员(DBERs)都接受过生物学、化学和物理学等科学学科的方法的正规培训,而不是心理学和教育学等社会科学学科。因此,DBERs 可能从未接受过其学术研究经常严重依赖的社会科学研究方法(定量或定性)的特定课程。(定量)社会科学研究与生物学和化学等学科明显不同的一个特定方面是用于量化现象的仪器。有鉴于此,本研究方法文章从当代社会科学的角度探讨了测试有效性和验证过程。这篇教学文章探讨了测试有效性、验证过程、有效性证据以及对有效性的主要威胁等概念。本文还包括一个关于学生论证分析测试的有效性论证和验证方法的深入示例。除了 DBERs 之外,本文还应该使从业人员(例如,实验室主任、教师)受益,他们可以在开发、评估和/或选择评估学生或评估教学创新的工具方面受益。