• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在经过认证的乳腺癌中心接受治疗的乳腺癌患者,在遵循指南、无复发生存和总生存率方面有显著提高:对 8323 例患者的评估。

Highly significant improvement in guideline adherence, relapse-free and overall survival in breast cancer patients when treated at certified breast cancer centres: An evaluation of 8323 patients.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ulm Medical School, Prittwitzstr. 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Würzburg Medical School, Josef-Schneider-Str. 4, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Breast. 2018 Aug;40:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.breast.2018.04.002
PMID:29698925
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Certified multi-disciplinary breast cancer centres (CBCs) have been established worldwide. Development of CBCs, guideline-adherent systemic therapy and surgical management should now show an impact on outcomes. This analysis aimed to investigate whether guideline adherence (GA) rates, relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) have significantly improved at CBCs compared to the pre-certification period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

8323 patients with primary breast cancer were treated in 17 German CBCs, which had been certified between 2003 and 2007 [2003 (n = 1), 2004 (n = 6), 2005 (n = 3), 2006 (n = 6) and 2007 (n = 1)]. 3544 patients (42.6%) were treated before certification and 4779 patients (57.4%) after certification.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

A highly significant (p < 0.001) difference in 100%-GA was found between the various hospitals before certification (min 25.0%; max 54.6%). In 2008, when all participating hospitals were certified, the GA rate was 61.8% (min 39.5%, max 74.4%) and 69.2% (min 45.9%, max 86.4%) for patients <75 y (n = 6675). The difference between pre-certification 100%-GA (46.9%) and post-certification (57.2%) was highly significant (p < 0.001). RFS and OS were both significantly better after certification compared to the pre-certification period (RFS: HR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.68-0.92; p = 0.003; OS: HR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65-0.85; p < 0.001). 5-year RFS (OS) of patients <75 y was 89.6% (85.4%) pre-certification and 91.4% (89.5%) post-certification. Since improvement in GA and outcomes correlated as well, GA remains a highly significant prognostic factor for RFS and OS regardless of NPI, intrinsic subtype and adjuvant systemic therapy. This suggests that the certification process is strongly associated with improvements in outcome.

摘要

目的

全球已建立了经过认证的多学科乳腺癌中心(CBC)。现在,CBC 的发展、遵循指南的系统治疗和手术管理应该会对结果产生影响。本分析旨在研究与认证前相比,CBC 的指南遵循率(GA)、无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS)是否显著提高。

材料和方法

在 17 家德国 CBC 中治疗了 8323 名原发性乳腺癌患者,这些 CBC 分别于 2003 年至 2007 年获得认证[2003 年(n=1)、2004 年(n=6)、2005 年(n=3)、2006 年(n=6)和 2007 年(n=1)]。3544 名患者(42.6%)在认证前接受治疗,4779 名患者(57.4%)在认证后接受治疗。

结果和结论

在认证前,各医院之间的 100%-GA 存在显著差异(p<0.001)(最小值为 25.0%;最大值为 54.6%)。2008 年,当所有参与医院都获得认证时,GA 率为 61.8%(最小值为 39.5%,最大值为 74.4%),75 岁以下患者为 69.2%(最小值为 45.9%,最大值为 86.4%)(n=6675)。认证前 100%-GA(46.9%)和认证后的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。与认证前相比,认证后 RFS 和 OS 均显著提高(RFS:HR=0.79;95%CI:0.68-0.92;p=0.003;OS:HR=0.75;95%CI:0.65-0.85;p<0.001)。75 岁以下患者的 5 年 RFS(OS)为认证前 89.6%(85.4%)和认证后 91.4%(89.5%)。由于 GA 和结果的改善呈正相关,因此,无论 NPI、内在亚型和辅助全身治疗如何,GA 仍然是 RFS 和 OS 的一个高度显著的预后因素。这表明认证过程与结果的改善密切相关。

相似文献

1
Highly significant improvement in guideline adherence, relapse-free and overall survival in breast cancer patients when treated at certified breast cancer centres: An evaluation of 8323 patients.在经过认证的乳腺癌中心接受治疗的乳腺癌患者,在遵循指南、无复发生存和总生存率方面有显著提高:对 8323 例患者的评估。
Breast. 2018 Aug;40:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
2
[Effects of guideline-compliant therapy on the survival of primary breast cancer patients with: results of a retrospective cohort study].[符合指南的治疗对原发性乳腺癌患者生存的影响:一项回顾性队列研究的结果]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(6):468-75. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
3
Triple-negative breast cancer: the impact of guideline-adherent adjuvant treatment on survival--a retrospective multi-centre cohort study.三阴性乳腺癌:辅助治疗遵循指南对生存的影响——一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Apr;132(3):1073-80. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1935-y. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
4
The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on the survival of primary breast cancer patients: a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 8935 subjects.辅助放疗对原发性乳腺癌患者生存的影响:一项对8935名受试者的回顾性多中心队列研究。
Ann Oncol. 2014 Mar;25(3):628-632. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt584. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
5
Is guideline-adherent adjuvant treatment an equal alternative for patients aged >65 who cannot participate in adjuvant clinical breast cancer trials? A retrospective multi-center cohort study of 4,142 patients.对于无法参与辅助性乳腺癌试验的65岁以上患者,遵循指南的辅助治疗是否是一种等效选择?一项对4142例患者的回顾性多中心队列研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Mar;291(3):631-40. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3438-7. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
6
Tumor biology in older breast cancer patients--what is the impact on survival stratified for guideline adherence? A retrospective multi-centre cohort study of 5378 patients.老年乳腺癌患者的肿瘤生物学——对遵循指南分层生存的影响是什么?一项对5378例患者的回顾性多中心队列研究。
Breast. 2015 Jun;24(3):256-62. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
7
Guidelines are advantageous, though not essential for improved survival among breast cancer patients.指南是有益的,尽管对于提高乳腺癌患者的生存率并非必不可少。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jul;152(2):357-66. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3484-2. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
8
Comparing the outcome between multicentric and multifocal breast cancer: what is the impact on survival, and is there a role for guideline-adherent adjuvant therapy? A retrospective multicenter cohort study of 8,935 patients.比较多中心性和多灶性乳腺癌的结局:对生存的影响是什么,以及辅助治疗是否符合指南?一项回顾性多中心队列研究,纳入了 8935 例患者。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Dec;142(3):579-90. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2772-y. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
9
Survival of patients with bilateral versus unilateral breast cancer and impact of guideline adherent adjuvant treatment: a multi-centre cohort study of 5292 patients.双侧与单侧乳腺癌患者的生存情况及辅助治疗遵循指南情况的影响:5292 例患者的多中心队列研究。
Breast. 2012 Apr;21(2):171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
10
Personalized axillary dissection: the number of excised lymph nodes of nodal-positive breast cancer patients has no significant impact on relapse-free and overall survival.个体化腋窝淋巴结清扫:淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者切除的淋巴结数量对无复发生存率和总生存率无显著影响。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep;143(9):1823-1831. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2425-3. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics, Treatment, and Survival of Male Breast Cancer: A 21-year Retrospective Analysis at a Community Academic Institute in Central Illinois.男性乳腺癌的特征、治疗与生存情况:伊利诺伊州中部一所社区学术机构的21年回顾性分析
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251335365. doi: 10.1177/10732748251335365. Epub 2025 Apr 20.
2
Quality-assured treatment in certified cancer center networks in upper Franconia, Germany: a population-centered retrospective cohort analysis based on data of the Bavarian cancer registry.德国上弗兰肯地区认证癌症中心网络中的质量保证治疗:基于巴伐利亚癌症登记处数据的以人群为中心的回顾性队列分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 22;24(1):1453. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11972-3.
3
A Comparison of ChatGPT and Multidisciplinary Team Meeting Treatment Recommendations in 10 Consecutive Cervical Cancer Patients.
10例连续宫颈癌患者中ChatGPT与多学科团队会议治疗建议的比较
Cureus. 2024 Aug 22;16(8):e67458. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67458. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Implementation of quality indicators for vulvar cancer in gynaecological cancer centres certified by the German Cancer Society (DKG).德国癌症学会(DKG)认证的妇科癌症中心外阴癌质量指标的实施。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 May 10;150(5):250. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05769-4.
5
Treatment in Certified Breast Cancer Centers Improves Chances of Survival of Patients with Breast Cancer: Evidence Based on Health Care Data from the WiZen Study.在认证乳腺癌中心接受治疗可提高乳腺癌患者的生存几率:基于WiZen研究医疗数据的证据
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024 Jan 9;84(2):153-163. doi: 10.1055/a-1869-1772. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Impact of a Multidisciplinary Head and Neck Tumor Board on Treatment and Survival in Laryngeal Carcinoma.多学科头颈部肿瘤委员会对喉癌治疗和生存的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Nov 23;30(12):10085-10099. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30120733.
7
Initial Cancer Treatment in Certified Versus Non-Certified Hospitals.认证医院与非认证医院的癌症初始治疗。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 Sep 29;120(39):647-654. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0169.
8
Implementation and update of guideline-derived quality indicators for cervical cancer in gynecological cancer centers certified by the German Cancer Society (DKG).德国癌症协会(DKG)认证的妇科癌症中心中宫颈癌指南衍生质量指标的实施与更新。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(14):12755-12764. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05132-z. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
9
Monitoring of postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, D-dimer, and CA153 in: Diagnostic value for recurrent and metastatic breast cancer.术后中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、D-二聚体及CA153监测在复发性和转移性乳腺癌诊断中的价值
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:927491. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.927491. eCollection 2022.
10
Survival Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board for Breast Cancer in Mozambique, Sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲莫桑比克乳腺癌多学科肿瘤委员会的生存影响及成本效益
Oncologist. 2021 Jun;26(6):e996-e1008. doi: 10.1002/onco.13643. Epub 2021 Jan 6.