a Department of Psychology , University of Huddersfield , Huddersfield , UK.
b Department of Behavioural and Social Sciences , University of Huddersfield , Huddersfield , UK.
Int J Environ Health Res. 2018 Jun;28(3):293-305. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2018.1468425. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
The objective of this review was to scope the literature on nature-based interventions that could be conducted in institutional settings where people reside full-time for care or rehabilitation purposes. Systematic searches were conducted across CINAHL, Medline, Criminal Justice Abstracts, PsycINFO, Scopus, Social Care Online and Cochrane CENTRAL. A total of 85 studies (reported in 86 articles) were included. Four intervention modalities were identified: Gardening/therapeutic horticulture; animal-assisted therapies; care farming and virtual reality-based simulations of natural environments. The interventions were conducted across a range of settings, including inpatient wards, care homes, prisons and women's shelters. Generally, favourable impacts were seen across intervention types, although the reported effects varied widely. There is a growing body of literature on nature-based interventions that could be applied to a variety of institutional settings. Within most intervention types, there is sufficient research data available to perform full systematic reviews. Recommendations for future systematic reviews are offered.
本次综述的目的是概述可在全时居住于机构场所的人群中开展的基于自然的干预措施，这些场所提供护理或康复服务。系统检索了 CINAHL、Medline、刑事司法摘要、PsycINFO、Scopus、社会关怀在线和 Cochrane CENTRAL。共纳入 85 项研究（在 86 篇文章中报告）。确定了四种干预方式：园艺/治疗性园艺；动物辅助疗法；关怀农场和基于虚拟现实的自然环境模拟。这些干预措施在各种环境中进行，包括住院病房、护理院、监狱和妇女收容所。一般来说，各种干预类型都显示出有利的影响，尽管报告的效果差异很大。基于自然的干预措施的文献越来越多，可以应用于各种机构环境。在大多数干预类型中，都有足够的研究数据可用于进行全面的系统评价。提供了对未来系统评价的建议。
