• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与者的基线特征和自然为本的社会干预“自然之友”在芬兰辅助生活设施中孤独的老年人中的反馈:RECETAS 欧盟项目的随机对照试验。

Participants' baseline characteristics and feedback of the nature-based social intervention "friends in nature" among lonely older adults in assisted living facilities in finland: a randomised controlled trial of the RECETAS EU-project.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.

Unit of Primary Health Care, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05408-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05408-0
PMID:
39375627
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11457361/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Loneliness is common among older adults in institutional settings. It leads to adverse effects on health and wellbeing, for which nature contact with peers in turn may have positive impact. However, the effects of nature engagement among older adults have not been studied in randomised controlled trials (RCT). The "Friends in Nature" (FIN) group intervention RCT for lonely older adults in Helsinki assisted living facilities (ALFs) aims to explore the effects of peer-related nature experiences on loneliness and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In this study we aim describe the participants' baseline characteristics of the RCT, feasibility of FIN intervention and intervention participants' feedback on the FIN.

METHODS

Lonely participants were recruited from 22 ALFs in Helsinki area, Finland, and randomised into two groups: 1) nature-based social intervention once a week for nine weeks (n = 162) and 2) usual care (n = 157). Demographics, diagnoses and medication use were retrieved from medical records, and baseline cognition, functioning, HRQoL, loneliness and psychological wellbeing were assessed. Primary trial outcomes will be participants' loneliness (De Jong Giervald Loneliness Scale) and HRQoL (15D).

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 83 years, 73% were female and mean Minimental State Examination of 21 points. The participants were living with multiple co-morbidities and/or disabilities. The intervention and control groups were comparable at baseline. The adherence with intervention was moderate, with a mean attendance of 6.8 out of the nine sessions. Of the participants, 14% refused, fell ill or were deceased, and therefore, participated three sessions or less. General subjective alleviation of loneliness was achieved in 57% of the intervention participants. Of the respondents, 96% would have recommended a respective group intervention to other older adults. Intervention participants appreciated their nature excursions and experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

We have successfully randomised 319 lonely residents in assisted living facilities into a trial about the effects of nature experiences in a group-format. The feedback from participants was favourable. The trial will provide important information about possibilities of alleviating loneliness with peer-related nature-based experiences in frail residents.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05507684. Registration 19/08/2022.

摘要

背景

孤独在机构环境中的老年人中很常见。它会对健康和幸福感产生不良影响,而与同龄人进行自然接触反过来可能会产生积极影响。然而,老年人参与自然活动的效果尚未在随机对照试验 (RCT) 中进行研究。“自然中的朋友”(FIN)小组干预随机对照试验旨在探索与同龄人相关的自然体验对孤独感和与健康相关的生活质量 (HRQoL) 的影响。在这项研究中,我们旨在描述 RCT 中参与者的基线特征、FIN 干预的可行性以及干预参与者对 FIN 的反馈。

方法

从芬兰赫尔辛基地区的 22 个辅助生活设施中招募孤独的参与者,并将他们随机分为两组:1)每周一次的基于自然的社交干预,共九周(n=162)和 2)常规护理(n=157)。从病历中检索人口统计学、诊断和药物使用情况,并评估基线认知、功能、HRQoL、孤独感和心理幸福感。主要试验结果将是参与者的孤独感(De Jong Giervald 孤独量表)和 HRQoL(15D)。

结果

参与者的平均年龄为 83 岁,73%为女性,平均简易精神状态检查得分为 21 分。参与者患有多种合并症和/或残疾。干预组和对照组在基线时具有可比性。干预的依从性中等,平均参加了 9 次课程中的 6.8 次。由于拒绝、生病或死亡,14%的参与者只参加了三节课或更少的课程。57%的干预参与者普遍减轻了孤独感。在受访者中,96%的人会向其他老年人推荐相应的团体干预。干预参与者欣赏他们的自然远足和体验。

结论

我们已经成功地将 319 名孤独的辅助生活设施居民随机分为一项关于在团体形式下体验自然对缓解孤独感的影响的试验。参与者的反馈是积极的。该试验将提供有关在脆弱居民中通过与同龄人相关的基于自然的体验缓解孤独感的可能性的重要信息。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,ID:NCT05507684。注册于 2022 年 8 月 19 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51f6/11457361/9732af20c37b/12877_2024_5408_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51f6/11457361/9732af20c37b/12877_2024_5408_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51f6/11457361/9732af20c37b/12877_2024_5408_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Participants' baseline characteristics and feedback of the nature-based social intervention "friends in nature" among lonely older adults in assisted living facilities in finland: a randomised controlled trial of the RECETAS EU-project.参与者的基线特征和自然为本的社会干预“自然之友”在芬兰辅助生活设施中孤独的老年人中的反馈:RECETAS 欧盟项目的随机对照试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05408-0.
2
Nature-based social interventions to address loneliness among vulnerable populations: a common study protocol for three related randomized controlled trials in Barcelona, Helsinki, and Prague within the RECETAS European project.基于自然的社会干预措施以解决弱势人群的孤独感:RECETAS 欧洲项目中巴塞罗那、赫尔辛基和布拉格三个相关随机对照试验的共同研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 13;24(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17547-x.
3
Comparing Loneliness, Social Inactivity, and Social Isolation: Associations with Health-Related Quality of Life and Mortality among Home-Dwelling Older Adults.比较孤独感、社会活动不足和社会隔离与居家老年人体健康相关生活质量和死亡率的关联。
Gerontology. 2024;70(10):1103-1112. doi: 10.1159/000540345. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
4
Physical Activity Intervention for Loneliness (PAIL) in community-dwelling older adults: a randomised feasibility study.社区居住老年人身体活动干预预防孤独感(PAIL):一项随机可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 May 23;6:73. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00587-0. eCollection 2020.
5
Behavioural activation to prevent depression and loneliness among socially isolated older people with long-term conditions: The BASIL COVID-19 pilot randomised controlled trial.针对患有长期疾病且社会隔离的老年人的行为激活以预防抑郁和孤独感:BASIL COVID-19 先导随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Oct 12;18(10):e1003779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003779. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Loneliness in assisted living facilities: An exploration of the group process.安老院中的孤独感:对小组过程的探索。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2021 Jul;28(5):354-365. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2019.1690043. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
7
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Chair-based yoga programme for older adults with multimorbidity: RCT with embedded economic and process evaluations.基于椅子的瑜伽方案在患有多种慢性病的老年人中的应用:RCT 嵌入经济和过程评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Sep;28(53):1-152. doi: 10.3310/KPGN4216.
10
Layperson-Delivered Telephone-Based Behavioral Activation Among Low-Income Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The HEAL-HOA Randomized Clinical Trial.疫情期间针对低收入老年群体开展的基于电话的由非专业人员实施的行为激活治疗:HEAL-HOA 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2416767. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.16767.

本文引用的文献

1
Nature-based social interventions to address loneliness among vulnerable populations: a common study protocol for three related randomized controlled trials in Barcelona, Helsinki, and Prague within the RECETAS European project.基于自然的社会干预措施以解决弱势人群的孤独感:RECETAS 欧洲项目中巴塞罗那、赫尔辛基和布拉格三个相关随机对照试验的共同研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 13;24(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17547-x.
2
Understanding loneliness: a systematic review of the impact of social prescribing initiatives on loneliness.理解孤独:社会处方干预对孤独影响的系统评价
Perspect Public Health. 2021 Jul;141(4):204-213. doi: 10.1177/1757913920967040. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
3
Greenspace Interventions, Stress and Cortisol: A Scoping Review.
绿地干预、压力和皮质醇:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 10;18(6):2802. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062802.
4
Nature's Role in Supporting Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Geospatial and Socioecological Study.自然在支持 COVID-19 大流行期间健康方面的作用:一项地理空间和社会生态研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 24;18(5):2227. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052227.
5
Relationship between Anticholinergic Burden and Health-Related Quality of Life among Residents in Long-Term Care.长期护理机构居民中抗胆碱能负担与健康相关生活质量的关系。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(2):224-229. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1493-2.
6
Green space exposure on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.老年人暴露于绿地与死亡率和心血管结局的关系:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jul;33(7):1783-1797. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01710-0. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
7
What is the prevalence of loneliness amongst older people living in residential and nursing care homes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.居住在养老院和护理院的老年人中孤独感的患病率是多少?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Age Ageing. 2020 Aug 24;49(5):748-757. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa049.
8
Effectiveness of horticultural therapy in people with dementia: A quantitative systematic review.园艺疗法对痴呆症患者的疗效:一项定量系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jul;31(13-14):1983-1997. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15204. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
9
Nature-Based Social Prescribing in Urban Settings to Improve Social Connectedness and Mental Well-being: a Review.基于自然的城市环境社会处方对改善社会联系和心理健康的作用:综述。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019 Dec;6(4):297-308. doi: 10.1007/s40572-019-00251-7.
10
The Effects of Preventive Home Visits on Older People's Use of Health Care and Social Services and Related Costs.预防性家访对老年人医疗保健和社会服务的使用及其相关费用的影响。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Jul 13;75(8):1586-1593. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz139.