Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Global Product Development Medical Affairs, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Biomathematics, University of Thessaly School of Medicine, Larisa, Greece.
Clin Ther. 2018 May;40(5):798-809.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
With the introduction of biosimilars of anticancer monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in oncology, physicians are potentially confronted with the question whether it is clinically adequate to switch patients who are clinically stable on treatment with the reference product to a newly available biosimilar (or vice versa/from 1 biosimilar to another). For a proper impact assessment of switching, robust, product-specific, and clinically relevant evidence should be required, ideally including data from appropriately designed switching studies. In this article, we assess the current body of switching data available for approved or proposed biosimilars of anticancer mAbs.
PubMed was systematically searched and ClinicalTrials.gov and abstract databases of selected congresses were hand-searched to identify all switching studies including biosimilars of anticancer mAbs.
We identified 8 switching studies with biosimilars of rituximab (CT-P10, GP2013, PF-05280586, and BCD-020) and trastuzumab (ABP 980). Two were performed in oncology indications and the other 6 in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Key elements of a well-designed switching study, such as randomization and blinding, were contained in several of the studies, but significant limitations were also present. The most frequent limitations were low statistical power because of small patient numbers, lack of an appropriate control arm, short follow-up, chosen outcome measures, and (for studies performed in RA) the concern whether switching data can be extrapolated to oncology indications. Accordingly, the data from these studies need to be interpreted with caution. Of note, all identified studies included a single switch only, whereas multiple switches may occur in the real-world setting. The scientific need to evaluate the impact of repeated switching has been recognized by the US Food and Drug Administration, who incorporated such a requirement in its draft guidance on interchangeability.
From the scarce data available, the consequences of switching between reference product mAbs and their biosimilar(s) in the oncology setting are as yet unknown. Additional clinical evidence from well-designed switching studies is needed to guide switching decisions.
随着抗肿瘤单克隆抗体(mAb)生物类似药在肿瘤学中的引入,医生可能会面临这样一个问题,即对于临床稳定的患者,将其从参考产品治疗切换到新的可获得的生物类似药(或反之亦然/从一种生物类似药切换到另一种)是否在临床上是足够的。为了对切换进行适当的影响评估,需要具有稳健性、产品特异性和临床相关性的证据,理想情况下还应包括来自适当设计的切换研究的数据。本文评估了已批准或提议的抗肿瘤 mAb 生物类似药的现有切换数据。
系统地检索了 PubMed,并手动搜索了选定会议的 ClinicalTrials.gov 和摘要数据库,以确定所有包括抗肿瘤 mAb 生物类似药的切换研究。
我们确定了 8 项与利妥昔单抗(CT-P10、GP2013、PF-05280586 和 BCD-020)和曲妥珠单抗(ABP 980)生物类似药相关的切换研究。其中两项在肿瘤适应证中进行,另外 6 项在类风湿关节炎(RA)中进行。设计良好的切换研究的关键要素,如随机化和盲法,在几项研究中都有体现,但也存在显著的局限性。最常见的局限性是由于患者数量少、缺乏适当的对照组、随访时间短、选择的结局测量指标以及(对于在 RA 中进行的研究)是否可以将切换数据推断到肿瘤适应证的问题,导致统计效力低。因此,需要谨慎解释这些研究的数据。值得注意的是,所有确定的研究都只包括单次切换,而在实际环境中可能会发生多次切换。美国食品和药物管理局已经认识到需要评估重复切换的影响,并在其关于可互换性的草案指南中纳入了这一要求。
从现有数据来看,在肿瘤学环境中,参考产品 mAb 与其生物类似药之间切换的后果目前尚不清楚。需要来自精心设计的切换研究的额外临床证据来指导切换决策。